Since the initial value and increments are integers, is an integer. If , all three positive parts in the second difference are zero. If , the second difference is , including . At it equals . Thus
The original PDF has the first term ; the TeX's is an extraction error. This discrete call-price curvature identity isolates an individual integer state.
For an integer and , verify the single-step identity
If , the positive part is linear across the step and ; if , it remains zero and . At , , which is checked for the three permitted values of .
Apply this with and , and telescope over . The result is the discrete Tanaka formula
The first sum is a martingale transform; the second records the correction at the kink of the positive part. The algebraic identity itself needs only the integer values and permitted increments, not the martingale property.
Taking expectations in the single-step discrete Tanaka formula, the martingale transform term vanishes because is bounded and -measurable. Hence
At a state with , the tower property of conditional expectation gives , so the conditional second moment of the increment is . Part (a) gives . Combining these identities yields the discrete Dupire equation
The conditional variance needs a positive-probability conditioning state. The bound does not guarantee . If , both the call-price curvature and the time increment above are zero; the equation can be extended by assigning an arbitrary finite value to at such a state, but its conditional variance is not determined there.
Let and . Given , the next value is one of . The martingale property makes its upward and downward conditional probabilities equal; their sum is the conditional variance of the increment, . Thus
The discrete Dupire equation therefore recovers all positive-probability one-step conditional transitions from the European call option price surface. No Markov property is required: these are conditional probabilities given the current value, not necessarily given the whole past.
Recovery is impossible at a zero-probability state. For example, satisfies every stated assumption, but at a different integer can satisfy while . Its conditional transitions can be specified arbitrarily without altering . Thus the literal all-states claim needs the positive-probability qualification.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.