The chain rule and
give
Applying the same rule to and in the Euler-Lagrange field equation yields the exact modulated equation
Multiply this equation by . Since and are independent of the fast phase,
The product rule then rearranges the field equation into the exact modulated-wave first integral
Average this identity over one period in . Periodicity kills the first term, while differentiation of the averaged Lagrangian gives
Consequently
The same two equations follow directly from the modulated variational principle. Varying gives
which is the exact field equation above. For a variation of , use and . Integration by parts in and gives the averaged equation. Thus variation with respect to the periodic profile reproduces the local wave equation, whereas variation with respect to its slow phase gives the Whitham modulation equation for wave action.
Here
so the Euler-Lagrange field equation is the variable-coefficient wave equation
At leading order, has
and hence
The leading part of the modulated-wave first integral is
A nonconstant periodic wave therefore requires the local dispersion relation
This is usually called the eikonal equation, or equivalently the leading geometric-optics dispersion relation.
Since and the average of over one period is , the leading averaged Lagrangian is
Its Euler-Lagrange equation for the slowly varying amplitude is algebraic:
For a nonzero wave this again gives the dispersion relation. It does not determine because the original wave equation is linear and homogeneous: the leading amplitude is fixed only by the next-order transport equation and by initial or boundary data.
Define the wave-action density
The local dispersion relation implies
which is the group velocity. Moreover,
Substitution into the phase-variation equation gives the wave-action conservation law
On the two nondispersive branches , the group velocities are .
Let
The inequality and a split into , , and show that
Thus replacing the exponential by one does not affect any term through .
Factor
where
Partial fraction decomposition gives
The required asymptotic expansion follows from
Therefore
The two small roots reveal the same nested scales and that a divide-and-conquer asymptotic expansion would match explicitly.
Write the summand as . By Stirling formula,
Set
Then the exponential phase is
It has a unique maximum at , where and . The contributing indices satisfy , so their width tends to infinity and the lattice sum may be replaced by a Riemann sum. The Discrete Laplace method therefore gives
Hence
Three distinguished limits are needed.
In the origin layer, put and . Since , the leading equation is
It has the first integral
Solving this first-order linear differential equation gives
Regularity at requires , and then fixes . Thus Region I, , has
Its matching limit is as .
In Region II, with , setting reduces the second-order equation to
Hence . Matching with the inner limit fixes , so
The correction generated by changes the local decay rate when . For Region III set
The terms of order give the eikonal equation
and the next balance gives . Matching to Region II selects
Therefore
This solution is already beyond all algebraic orders in in the distant region. A leading multiplicative composite expansion that contains all three balances and satisfies the boundary value exactly is
with its value at understood by continuity.
Finally, the coefficient of vanishes at the origin. Taking the regular limit of the original equation there gives
so the prescribed value also fixes . Equivalently, the second inner solution behaves as and is excluded by regularity. This regular singular point is why one boundary condition determines the unique regular solution.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.