For a series of complex numbers, form the partial sums . The series converges when these partial sums have a finite limit of a sequence :
The series has absolute convergence when converges as a series of nonnegative real numbers. A series beginning at uses the same definitions with that starting index.
Let and . If converges, it is a Cauchy sequence. Thus, for every , some makes
where the triangle inequality gives the bound. Therefore is a Cauchy sequence in the complex numbers. These form a complete metric space, so has a finite limit of a sequence. Equivalently, apply the Cauchy criterion for series. Hence absolute convergence implies convergence.
The finite geometric series identity, obtained by subtracting times the sum from the sum itself, gives
For , the geometric sequence tends to zero by Question 2(a)(iii). Therefore
The radius of convergence of a power series is the number such that the series has absolute convergence for and diverges for . Equivalently,
Use , including at . The supremum may be . There is no general conclusion at : boundary convergence depends on the coefficients. If , only the centre is guaranteed; if , every finite lies inside the disk of convergence.
The comparison test for series states that, for eventually, convergence of implies convergence of . Equivalently, divergence of implies divergence of .
For , the coefficient bound gives
by the geometric series formula and the comparison test for series. The single term does not affect convergence. For ,
so the terms do not tend to zero. The fact that terms of a convergent series tend to zero excludes convergence there. Thus
If , there is no with , so the claim is vacuous. Suppose . Convergence of implies , because terms of a convergent series tend to zero. In particular this is a bounded sequence, so for some finite and every .
For , put . Then
The geometric series and comparison test for series prove
Thus convergence at one point gives absolute convergence at every point strictly closer to the centre.
All three examples below have positive integer coefficients, so they work under either convention for whether .
For , take . This is the geometric series: it converges for , and its terms fail to tend to zero for .
For , take , using the factorial and . For every fixed , the absolute values of successive terms have ratio . This eventually exceeds two, so the terms grow without bound and the series cannot converge. At it is finite, giving radius of convergence zero.
For , take
using the floor function. The coefficients satisfy
The upper bound and the comparison test for series give absolute convergence when . The lower bound prevents the terms tending to zero when . Hence the radius of convergence is exactly .
Use the ceiling function to choose positive integer coefficients
Because , we have and
For , the comparison test for series with the geometric series gives
For , we instead have , so the terms do not tend to zero. Thus the power series has radius of convergence exactly .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.