True. Put , and . These suprema exist by completeness of the real numbers, since the sets are nonempty and bounded. Every set element of the union is at most , so is an upper bound. Conversely, every upper bound of bounds both and , and is therefore at least both suprema. Thus
True. Write and . Every , satisfies , giving an upper bound for the set of pairwise differences. For every , the definitions of supremum and infimum give and with
Then . Hence no smaller upper bound works, and
Here means pairwise subtraction, rather than set difference.
False. Take the finite sets . Their suprema are both , whereas the set of pairwise products is . Consequently
Negative factors can reverse an inequality, which prevents the proposed argument with separate suprema.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.