Put . The angular acceleration is constant. The initial rest conditions and giveFor the upward rightward pull in the diagram, , the sign of is the sign of . Consequently it rolls towards the horizontal pull when . At it remains at rest, with balanced forces and torques. For , it rolls to the left. In particular a horizontal pull, , makes it roll to the right, since . If other pulling angles are allowed, the general condition for motion in the same horizontal direction as the pull is .
The required static friction at each rail follows from the translational equation:For it is positive, agreeing with the leftward force convention. The assumed rolling without slipping is physically possible only if the rails can supply this force while maintaining contact. With coefficient of static friction , the necessary contact inequalities areFor the usual pulling range, these becomeIf either fails, the proposed motion requires lift-off or more static friction than the rails provide. Equality is also incompatible here: it gives but a nonzero required friction. The question supplies no coefficient of static friction, so it determines the required friction exactly but gives no numerical slip threshold. If is regarded as a prescribed force rather than an available contact response, it must equal for the rolling constraint to hold.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.