The mean value theorem states that if is continuous on and differentiable on , where , there is such thatNo continuity assumption on the derivative is needed.
The constancy theorem states that a differentiable function on an interval whose derivative vanishes everywhere is constant. At any included endpoints, continuity there is understood.
Indeed, take arbitrary in the interval. The mean value theorem applies on and gives . Every pair of values is equal, proving the assertion. The interval hypothesis ensures that the whole segment lies in the domain.
The derivative of vanishes. By the constancy theorem on the interval ,This need not hold on a disconnected domain. On , define for and for . The function is differentiable throughout with , but no single works on both components.
Suppose distinct fixed points existed. Then satisfies . Rolle's theorem supplies with , hence , contrary to the hypothesis. Thus there is at most one fixed point. The argument does not require to be continuous.
For every real , , so there is no fixed point. Direct differentiation givesWriting , the inequality showsIn particular , but as . There is no common contraction constant smaller than one. Strict pointwise bounds on the derivative therefore do not suffice for the contraction mapping theorem.
By the mean value theorem, for all real . Thus is a contraction mapping on the complete metric space . Starting from arbitrary , define . Induction gives . For , the triangle inequality and a geometric series yieldHence is a Cauchy sequence and completeness of the real numbers supplies a limit . The Lipschitz continuity of implies . Thus the limit is a fixed point, independently of the initial value. If were another, would force . This proves the contraction mapping theorem in this setting, with error estimate
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.