The conjugate transpose reverses products and conjugates scalars. Since are Hermitian matrices,
Therefore In particular the commutator of two Hermitian matrices is anti-Hermitian, and multiplication by converts it to a Hermitian matrix.
Suppose and . Then
Because the eigenvalues of are distinct, the eigenspace for is one-dimensional. It follows that , including the possibility . Thus an orthonormal eigenbasis of is also an eigenbasis of . The simplicity of both spectra means their eigenvectors coincide as directions, up to ordering, phases and nonzero scalar multiples.
Conversely, if they share a complete eigenbasis, choose the unitary matrix whose columns are these common normalized eigenvectors. Then and are diagonal, so and . Hence
This is simultaneous diagonalization of the two Hermitian matrices.
The original PDF uses the conjugate transpose , rather than the transpose found in the transcription. The printed diagonalisation criterion is correct when diagonalisation means unitary diagonalization of a normal matrix. Since ,
Consequently if and only if . By part (ii), this gives a common unitary matrix and
which is diagonal. Conversely, if for a diagonal and a unitary matrix , then
Thus the precise conclusion is
If arbitrary invertible changes of basis are allowed, the printed assertion is false. For example,
satisfy . Both Hermitian matrices have distinct eigenvalues: for and for . The distinct eigenvalues make diagonalizable by similarity, but and differ. This distinguishes ordinary diagonalization from the required unitary version.
As is a unitary matrix, . Let . Its conjugate transpose is , so and every positive integer power are Hermitian matrices and have real eigenvalues.
More explicitly, if with real, then form an eigenbasis and
Therefore
where denotes the matrix size, to distinguish it from the power .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.