First simplify the coefficient of using
After dividing by , the second-order linear differential equation is
At zero, and , and both products are analytic there. At , and , again with analytic extensions. Thus , and there are no other finite singular points.
Infinity must also be considered because the question asks for all singular points. Put and . The coefficient of in its normal-form equation is . Multiplication by does not make it analytic at zero. Hence .
Set and use the Frobenius solution with . From part (a), the leading coefficients are and . The coefficient of the lowest power is therefore
The indicial equation reduces to , giving
Since , the two indicial roots differ by a nonzero imaginary number, not an integer. Thus the two local Frobenius solutions exist independently on a chosen branch of .
Define the Wronskian by . Differentiating and using the normal-form differential equation gives
Integrating this first-order linear differential equation proves Abel's identity:
Thus, on any interval avoiding zero and ,
Absolute-value signs from real logarithms can be absorbed into the constant on each such interval. For linearly independent solutions, .
At zero the indicial equation is , with repeated indicial root zero. To exhibit the analytic solution rather than only its candidate exponent, clear the denominator in the normal form:
Substitute and equate coefficients. With for negative indices, the linear recurrence relation is
Every leading coefficient on the left is nonzero. Hence is free and all later coefficients are determined; the Frobenius method guarantees local convergence up to the next singularity. In particular,
For a second solution, use reduction of order. Writing gives , so part (c) yields
The additive constant in the integral only adds a multiple of . As within , its integrand is
Therefore
The nonzero Wronskian proves linear independence, and the logarithm is unavoidable for this second local solution.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.