Original question.
When plane polarised light, after passing through a tube filled with an aqueous solution of sugar, is plane analysed, what phenomena are observed ?
Describe Biot's Saccharometer, and the method of using it for determining the amount of sugar present in diabetic urine.
An optically active glucose solution rotates the direction of linear polarization. With monochromatic illumination, rotating the polarimeter analyzer again produces a maximum and an extinction, but at angles shifted from the water-filled reference tube. In an ideal transparent sample, Malus's law gives
The specific rotation is defined for a stated temperature, wavelength, solvent and concentration convention. With in decimetres and in grams per millilitre, the conventional numerical value of must use the matching units. A broadband source generally gives coloured appearances because the rotation varies with wavelength; one analyser angle need not extinguish every colour.
Biot's saccharimeter is an angular polarimeter: a polarizing element, a tube of accurately known optical path length holding the sample between plane end windows, and a rotatable analysing element with an angular scale. The original arrangement used a black-glass polarizing mirror and a calcite analyser; later two-prism designs implement the same angular measurement. It should be distinguished from a later quartz-wedge compensating saccharimeter, which cancels the sample's rotation instead of directly reading the analyser rotation.[ref]
For a historical urine estimate, clarify a sample without changing its sugar inventory, fill the tube without bubbles, make a solvent blank at the same settings, and measure the signed rotation relative to that blank. With a known dilution factor and an appropriate equilibrium glucose calibration,
Repeat the reading and check a known glucose solution. Mutarotation makes the time since preparation relevant. The inference is selective only to the extent that other optically active solutes have been excluded or accounted for; a net rotation is not proof that every contribution is glucose. This is a historical analytical application, not a replacement for present clinical assessment of diabetes.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.