A subset is compact when every open cover of has a finite subcover. This may be stated using sets open in the ambient space or using the subspace topology on ; the definitions agree because every subspace-open set is the intersection of with an ambient-open set.
Let be an open cover of , with the sets open in . The preimages form an open cover of , because is continuous. By compactness, finitely many of these preimages cover . Their corresponding sets cover , providing a finite subcover. Hence the continuous image is compact.
The family contains the empty set and the entire real line. The intersection of two proper nonempty members is
so it is closed under finite intersection. For an arbitrary nonempty family of proper rays, put . If the thresholds are unbounded below, the union is ; otherwise the union is . In the latter case itself is in no ray, and every point greater than lies above some threshold, proving the equality. Empty unions and unions involving cause no difficulty. Thus arbitrary unions also belong to the family, establishing the topology axioms.
If , any open cover contains a member containing . Such a member is either or a ray with . It therefore contains every element of , so that single member is already a subcover.
Conversely suppose is nonempty and has no smallest element. Then
is an open cover of : for any , the lack of a minimum gives an below . A nonempty finite subcollection has union , where is the smallest of its thresholds. It misses . The empty subcollection cannot cover nonempty either. Hence there is no finite subcover, and is not compact. Thus compactness is equivalent to having a smallest element.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.