Assume the usual nondegenerate interval . The integral is bilinear and symmetric because the functions and weight are real. It is nonnegative on . If is nonzero at a point, continuity makes bounded below by a positive number on a nontrivial relative interval nearby, and the positive continuous weight is also bounded below there. Hence . Thus the formula is positive definite and defines an inner product.
The functions are orthogonal precisely whenA singleton interval would make this integral zero for every function, so the condition is necessary.
The intended orthogonal-polynomial convention is . An arbitrary orthonormal basis without this degree ordering does not satisfy the claim: permuting a standard basis can place the nonzero constant polynomial last, where it has no roots rather than . The following proof uses the required degree ordering.
It makes orthogonal to every polynomial of degree less than , since form a basis of that lower-degree space. Let be the distinct roots in at which changes sign, and put , with if . The product has constant sign on except at its finitely many zeros: each sign change of is canceled by that of .
If , then has degree below , so orthogonality gives . But a nonzero constant-sign continuous product against the positive weight has a nonzero integral, a contradiction. Thus . Since , there are exactly such roots, all simple, with no additional endpoint roots. In particularThis also includes , where the polynomial is nonzero constant and has no roots.
Use the intended degree ordering from part (b). Let be the degree- Lagrange cardinal polynomial at the distinct roots of :For any , polynomial division gives with and . Orthogonality of to makes the integral of zero, and that product also vanishes at every quadrature node. Meanwhile by interpolation. ConsequentlyThus the rule is exact up to degree . To determine the sign of a weight, apply exactness to , of degree :The inequality is strict because is a nonzero polynomial and the weight is positive. This is the Gaussian quadrature construction; the source asks only for nonnegative weights, and the proof gives positivity.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.