A strong local minimizer of a variational integral has the same property for all admissible with ; its derivative need not be close. Since the supremum norm is bounded by the Sobolev norm, this neighborhood contains a sufficiently small weak neighborhood. Thus every strong local minimizer is a weak local minimizer of a variational integral.
A point of convexity of a differentiable scalar function is one where its tangent supports the entire graph: for every . The Weierstrass necessary condition for strong minimality, under its differentiability assumptions in the slope variable, isfor almost every . In other words the reference slope is a point of convexity of the slope integrand. The later example is smooth, so these derivative-based conditions apply there.
Write . For the stipulated , the displayed tent is continuous at its junction, has zero endpoint values, and its slopes are and . At both slopes has the same value , and is strictly positive on common sufficiently small neighborhoods of them. Taylor's theorem gives, for small ,Thus is a strict weak local minimizer of a variational integral. It is not a strong local minimizer of a variational integral: the global supporting-tangent requirement at either slope has nonzero slope , whereas is bounded. Letting the trial slope tend to positive infinity violates that requirement. The Weierstrass necessary condition therefore fails.
The opening parameter range is essential. The subsequent phrase “for each ” must be read within it; taken literally beyond that range it is false. At the tent slopes are , where and , so this is not a weak minimum.
If is a strong local minimizer of a variational integral, the Weierstrass condition makes a point of convexity of the bounded function for almost every . A global supporting line to a bounded function must have zero slope, and its contact value must be a global minimum. Here that value is . Therefore almost everywhere and , while every admissible energy is at least . Hence every strong local minimizer is global.
For every positive integer , set . Its slopes are almost everywhere, both giving . Hence , the universal lower bound, and these tents are all distinct. Thus there are infinitely many global minimizers. Zero is another one.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
