Fix . Once , the following event inclusions hold outside :
Taking probabilities gives the explicit bounds
By the assumed convergence in probability, the error tends to zero. Therefore
The continuity of the cumulative distribution function at lets decrease to zero, proving This proves the needed implication directly, without invoking any theorem comparing convergence of random variables.
The definition of convergence in distribution gives at each continuity point of . We must handle a moving argument rather than assume this convergence is uniform.
A cumulative distribution function has at most countably many discontinuities: each is a jump of positive size, and there are at most jumps of size at least , since their sizes sum to at most one. Thus we can choose continuity points with and . For fixed , eventually . The monotonicity of each cumulative distribution function implies
First let , using the definition of convergence in distribution at . Then let , using continuity at :
No result relating different convergence of random variables has been assumed.
Use from part (a). We already proved convergence in distribution to zero. For any prescribed , put . Then , and the cumulative distribution function satisfies
This includes and , since the uniform distribution assigns zero probability to each endpoint. The limit cumulative distribution function is discontinuous at zero, explaining why the conclusion of (ii) does not apply there.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.