The uniqueness theorem for moment-generating functions states: if two real random variables have finite moment-generating functions on a common open interval with , and
then Finiteness throughout a neighborhood of zero is a hypothesis; the identity alone carries no information.
Let have the specified probability density function . Splitting the integral into the positive and negative half-lines, and using the Gamma integral for a nonnegative integer and , gives
At or , one term becomes the divergent integral of ; beyond these endpoints it grows exponentially. Consequently, the full extended-valued moment-generating function is
In particular , checking normalization of a probability distribution. All absolute moments exist. Direct integration yields
The symmetric distribution makes every odd moment zero, so
Now let have probability density function . Its moment-generating function would be
For every , one summand has exponential growth, which dominates the polynomial decay. Hence
There is no finite moment-generating function on any neighborhood of zero, but some moments still exist. Specifically,
Thus
For even , the moment is , so it is not a finite moment. For odd , both the positive and negative contributions have infinite integral, so the expected value is undefined. Cancellation in a Cauchy principal value does not define an expected value. In particular, when there are no finite positive-order moments.
First justify that the moments being used exist. For every ,
The bound gives for all .
If has a symmetric distribution, then and have the same probability distribution, so for odd ,
which forces .
Conversely, suppose every odd moment vanishes. For fixed , the absolute values of the partial Taylor series for are bounded by , whose expected value is finite by the preceding inequality. The dominated convergence theorem therefore permits termwise expectation:
The uniqueness theorem for moment-generating functions implies equality of the probability distributions of and . Hence
Let have the Pareto distribution with probability density function for , and zero otherwise. Its normalization of a probability distribution and first two moments follow from
Set . Then
The probability distribution of is not a symmetric distribution: almost surely, whereas and . For we have , so
Thus has every property required.
Take a discrete probability distribution on three points:
The probabilities are positive and sum to one. Direct calculation gives
and
Nevertheless it is not a symmetric distribution, since while . Vanishing of just the first and third moments does not force all odd moments to vanish.
It suffices that the moment-generating function be finite on some open interval containing zero:
Equivalently, some two-sided exponential moment exists: for some . For the forward implication, choose and use ; the converse follows from for .
Under this weaker hypothesis, all moments exist. For , dominated convergence justifies the Taylor series argument in (i). Vanishing odd moments gives near zero, and the local uniqueness theorem for moment-generating functions gives the symmetric distribution. The reverse implication follows directly from equality of the two probability distributions.
More generally, it suffices that all moments exist and the probability distribution have moment determinacy: and then have identical moments and hence identical probability distributions. Existence of all moments by itself does not provide that uniqueness.
The support condition forces . As a check, the joint probability density integrates to
For any real , the marginal density of is
Dividing the joint probability density by this marginal density gives the conditional density:
Thus, conditionally on , has the rate-two exponential distribution.
For , use the two inverse branches and . Each branch has absolute Jacobian determinant . Both lie in the original support exactly when and . The change of variables for probability densities therefore yields
No atom of a measure is created at , since . The value of the probability density function at this boundary may be assigned arbitrarily. Checking the integral over gives , which integrates to one.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.