Apply part (i) for every positive integer and discard the countable union of its exceptional null sets. A sample path bounded below never reaches for some such , and must therefore converge to a finite limit of a sequence.
Apply the same argument to the martingale . Outside one more null set, every sample path bounded above also converges finitely. Thus a sample path which does not converge finitely must be unbounded in both directions. Each finite initial segment has finite values, so removing any such segment preserves unboundedness. It follows that the limit superior is and the limit inferior is . ConsequentlyThis proves the bounded-increment martingale convergence-or-oscillation dichotomy; in particular one-sided divergence to infinity is impossible with positive probability.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.