Past exam of the relativity course of the University of Cambridge / 2015 / Paper 1 / 3

Use Cartesian coordinates $x^a=(t,x,y,z)$ with $c=1$ and ${\eta }_{ab}=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$. Spatial dot and cross products below use the Euclidean three-metric. The alternating tensor is given the orientation ${ϵ}^{0123}=+1$.

Vector and covector transformation. The vector $A=A^b{\partial }_b$ is independent of coordinates, and the chain rule gives ${\partial }_b=(\partial x^{\prime a}/\partial x^b){\partial }_a^{\prime }$. Likewise the one-form $A_{b}d{x}^b$ is independent of coordinates. Comparing coefficients provesTheir contraction $A_a{B}^a$ is unchanged because the forward and inverse Jacobians cancel. Here lowering an index uses the metric, not an identification of the numerical upper and lower components.

Why antisymmetrization matters. Write $J^c{}_a=\partial x^c/\partial x^{\prime a}$. Differentiating the covector law givesThe last term obstructs the general tensor transformation law. It is symmetric in $a,b$, so it cancels from ${\partial }_a^{\prime }{A}_b^{\prime }-{\partial }_b^{\prime }{A}_a^{\prime }$. ThereforeEquivalently $F=dA$ is the exterior derivative of the electromagnetic four-potential one-form. The statement that ${\partial }_a{A}_b$ is not a tensor needs a qualification: under affine Cartesian Lorentz transformations it does transform tensorially, because the second derivatives vanish. The failure concerns arbitrary nonlinear coordinate changes, including curvilinear coordinates in flat spacetime. This distinction is precisely the difference between general covariance and covariance under the restricted inertial-frame transformations.^[ref]

Electric and magnetic components. Choose $A^a=(\Phi ,\mathbf{A})$, so $A_a=(\Phi ,-\mathbf{A})$, $\mathbf{E}=-\nabla \Phi -{\partial }_t\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{B}=\nabla \times \mathbf{A}$. ThenThus the lower-index field tensor isThis is a derived component representation of the field, with the source's sign convention.

Raised indices and the first invariant. Raising both indices changes the time-space signs and leaves the spatial block unchanged:In the scalar contraction, each independent antisymmetric pair is counted twice, givingUnder a Lorentz transformation each inverse transformation from a lower index cancels its matching transformation from an upper index, leaving the same scalar. In particular a plane electromagnetic wave has $E=B$ in these units and makes this invariant vanish, while a pure electric field makes it negative.

The printed dual convention. The PDF explicitly defines ${}^{\ast }{F}^{ab}={ϵ}^{abcd}{F}_{cd}$, with no $1/2$. Each independent pair therefore contributes twice: for example ${}^{\ast }{F}^{01}=F_{23}-F_{32}=-2B_x$. The complete result isThe time-space pairs contribute $-4\mathbf{E}\cdot \mathbf{B}$ and the spatial pairs contribute another $-4\mathbf{E}\cdot \mathbf{B}$. The conventional Hodge dual includes $1/2$ and would instead give the contraction $-4\mathbf{E}\cdot \mathbf{B}$; it must not silently replace this paper's definition. With fixed orientation the latter contraction is a pseudoscalar: invariant under proper Lorentz transformations but odd under orientation reversal if compared using a fixed alternating symbol.

Energy density and flux. Substitution into the given mixed stress-energy tensor yieldsFor the first formula, $F^{0c}{F}_{0c}=-E^2$ and $F_{cd}{F}^{cd}/4=(B^2-E^2)/2$. For the second, $F^{0j}{F}_{ij}=(\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B}{)}_i$. The minus sign on $T^0{}_i$ arises from its lowered spatial index; it does not reverse the physical energy flow. Raising that index gives $T^{0i}=S_i$, and symmetry gives $T^{i0}=S_i$, with $\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B}/{\mu }_0$ the Poynting vector in $c=1$ units. Thus $T^{00}$ is energy density and $T^{i0}$ represents energy flux. In SI coordinates $x^0=ct$, restore $T^{0i}=S_i/c$ and $T^{00}=({ϵ}_0{E}_{\mathrm{SI}}^2+B^2/{\mu }_0)/2$, with ${ϵ}_0{\mu }_0{c}^2=1$. This keeps the mixed-index signs and the units distinct.