Complex differentiability gives , . Differentiating once more, for continuously differentiable first derivatives with the needed second derivatives, yields and . Thus both components satisfy Laplace's equation. The result is local on the domain of holomorphy; it makes no assertion across a branch cut.
Choose a continuous argument on a simply connected domain avoiding zero, and put . With , direct differentiation gives
Here , ; these identities specify the branch needed in the written arctangent. Integrating the Cauchy-Riemann equations gives
The literal principal works only separately on suitable half-planes. It cannot stand for a single continuous argument across the imaginary axis.
For the upper half-plane use , and interpret the source's arctangent as this argument. Then is harmonic, so has zero curl and divergence where there is no charge. On the positive boundary and ; on the negative boundary . Hence the two boundary values are respectively zero and .
Branch qualification: the principal real arctangent alone gives zero on both sides of , contradicting the stated negative-axis boundary condition, for example at . The continuous upper-half-plane argument repairs this notation; it is not an optional additive constant.
Along a level curve, , with and . Therefore
In the intended upper half-plane , the slope is positive for , vertical at , and negative for . At the positive real boundary the slope is zero except at the stationary point , where both derivatives vanish and the quotient is indeterminate. More generally, outside the chosen half-plane its sign is the sign of , with the argument branch held fixed. A convenient parametric description of the curves to sketch is .
Figure 1.
Equipotentials for the upper-half-plane logarithm branch and illustrative square-well transmission
. Details.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.