We first derive the stress and energy facts used in both parts. The Cauchy traction is force per unit area in the deformed configuration. The first Piola-Kirchhoff traction is force per unit reference area. Their force vectors are measured in the same spatial coordinates, but the area measures and the normals used to specify the surface are different.
Parametrize a reference surface by . Its oriented area vector is . Under deformation, the two tangents become . The cross-product identity
therefore proves Nanson's formula . Equality of the physical force on corresponding surface patches now gives
Since this holds for every reference normal,
The first Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor is generally not symmetric, whereas the Cauchy stress tensor is symmetric in the absence of couple stresses.
For the stated energy on orientation-preserving gradients, differentiation gives
A stress-free state satisfies . Taking determinants yields , so and : precisely . These states are also the global energy minimizers. If are the singular values, the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality gives , with equality only when the singular values are equal. The function decreases up to and increases thereafter, with minimum . Thus , with equality precisely at rotations. A constant shift of the energy can set this minimum to zero without changing the stress.
For the given simple shear,
For a unit normal , . Hence every reference plane whose normal lies in the plane is maximizing:
There is a family of maximizing planes, rather than one distinguished normal.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.