Let be the underlying Banach space. By the Laplace-transform formula for a semigroup resolvent,
These are Bochner integrals, defined for every and . The contraction semigroup bound and semigroup property give
Interchanging and regrouping these Bochner integrals is justified by the integrable bound , whose integral is . For , set and evaluate the inner scalar integral:
Since was arbitrary, the resolvent identity follows:
For , both sides vanish, so that case holds as well.
For , apply the resolvent identity from part (i) in both orders:
The two quotients are equal. For the assertion is immediate. Hence
Thus resolvent operators from the same strongly continuous semigroup commute. This conclusion does not require commuting arbitrary bounded linear operators; it uses the fact that both arise from the same semigroup generator.
A second-order nondivergence-form elliptic operator on a domain has the form
Only the symmetric part of affects the Hessian matrix term, so one may take symmetric. The operator is a uniformly elliptic operator if there is a constant , independent of , such that
A common bounded-coefficient convention additionally requires an upper bound with . The lower bound says that the principal quadratic form cannot degenerate in any direction or at any location.
For an explicit stochastic example, standard -dimensional Brownian motion has infinitesimal generator
Its principal quadratic form is , so it is uniformly elliptic with . More generally, a sufficiently regular stochastic differential equation has diffusion generator ; it is uniformly elliptic when has a uniformly positive lower bound. A conservative diffusion process has no zeroth-order term, since its infinitesimal generator annihilates constants.
The convergence is in the strong operator topology: for each fixed , one must prove . First, the contraction semigroup bound gives
Thus is a contraction. This is the useful scaling of the contraction estimate in the source's hint. Since ,
Fix . By strong continuity, choose so that for . Split the integral there and use for the tail:
Let and then . Therefore
The distinction from operator norm convergence is essential. For example, the multiplication semigroup on defined by is a strongly continuous semigroup of contractions: coordinatewise convergence and dominated convergence applied to prove strong continuity. Its resolvent operator is , and
Thus the claimed convergence cannot in general be read as convergence in operator norm.
Take in the generator domain . The semigroup commutation with its unbounded generator implies and
Indeed, applying the bounded operator to the difference quotient at zero gives the right derivative ; strong continuity gives the full orbit derivative for . Now integration by parts in the Bochner integral yields
The boundary term at infinity vanishes because . The derivative integral exists as a Bochner integral, since its integrand is bounded in norm by .
Multiplying this identity by gives
Part (b) applies to the fixed vector , so
The bounded operators are the Yosida approximation of the semigroup generator. The proof only applies the unbounded operator to ; the contraction and limit arguments then act on the ordinary vector .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.