Past exam of the thermal and statistical physics course of the University of Cambridge / 2016 / Paper 1 / 1 / a / Solution

Use the number-density virial expansion, following the density versus molar second virial convention, with $n=N/V$:Thus $B_2$ is the coefficient of the first density correction and has units of volume. With molar density instead, the molar coefficient is $N_A{B}_2$. For a classical pair potential $u(r)$,Attractive separations contribute negatively and short-range repulsion contributes positively. For inert-gas interactions the attractive contribution dominates at sufficiently low temperature, $B_2$ crosses zero at the Boyle temperature, and repulsion dominates above it.

The soft-core high-temperature second virial coefficient illustrates why the far-high-temperature tail depends on the model. A hard-core estimate $B_2\simeq b-a/(k_{B}T)$ tends to positive excluded volume $b$. A soft repulsive potential, such as the Lennard-Jones potential in the original diagram, allows a positive maximum followed by decay toward zero. The sign change is the main attraction-versus-repulsion feature; neither sketch should be interpreted as measured data for a specified gas. This classical, dilute-gas sketch omits low-temperature quantum-exchange corrections.^[ref]