Since , the image of a function is contained in . Both endpoints occur, at and . By continuity and the intermediate value theorem applied on , every intermediate value occurs too. Hence
It is not surjective onto because, for example, is not attained. It is not injective because although .
If , then and , so . Thus the function is strictly increasing on its domain and is injective. Its values are nonnegative, so it is not surjective onto :
If means its image of a function is ; if it includes zero its image of a function is . Indeed, for any , set and ; then . This convention does not change the classification.
With the convention , the even inputs map to for , while the odd inputs map to for . These two images of a function are disjoint and together equal . Within either class there are no repeated outputs. More explicitly the inverse function is
Consequently is both injective and surjective, hence a bijection. If instead , the input zero is absent: remains injective but its image of a function is , so it is not onto. The printed paper does not specify this convention; the zero-based convention gives the apparent intended bijection.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.