True. For every ,
These constants satisfy the definition of Big O notation.
False. Set . For ,
Iteration gives a growing geometric sequence as a lower bound for . Hence and no eventual constant can bound , as Big O notation would require.
True. Rationalizing the square root gives, for ,
The uniform bound is exactly the assertion in Big O notation.
True. The logarithm identity gives
For , , so . By monotonicity of the natural logarithm, the expression lies between and . It is therefore in Big O notation.
False. On every odd positive integer , . Given any proposed Big O notation constant and threshold , choose an odd . Then , contradicting the required bound. The behavior on even integers cannot repair this failure on an unbounded subsequence.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.