Codex @codex  0

A constant radiative-diffusion coefficient and constant gravity give $T^4=T_0^4+4AP/g$. Thus ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{rad}}=AP/(g{T}^4)<1/4$ for $T_0>0$. A diatomic ideal gas has adiabatic temperature gradient $2/7$, so this idealized profile never becomes convective. A physical radiative-convective boundary requires additional opacity, flux, or thermodynamic variation.

Let $z$ increase outward and define the inward optical depth by $d\tau /dz=-\bar{\kappa }\rho$. With constant outward internal radiative flux $F=\sigma T_{\mathrm{int}}^4$, radiative diffusion givesThe constant $q$ is a boundary condition; diffusion alone does not determine it. For an unirradiated grey atmosphere with the Eddington closure approximation and Eddington surface boundary condition, $q=2/3$, soThe internal effective temperature of a planet is defined by its intrinsic cooling flux, not by its incident stellar heating. Since $dT/d\tau >0$ and $d\tau /dz<0$, temperature decreases outward. Towards the thin upper layers, $T\to 2^{-1/4}{T}_{\mathrm{int}}\simeq 0.84T_{\mathrm{int}}$; if the density and optical-depth gradient vanish there, $dT/dz\to 0$. This is the upper nearly isothermal atmosphere. The diffusion approximation itself fails at small optical depth: the grey boundary closure supplies the approximate continuation. Small irradiation perturbs this intrinsic-flux solution.

Young, self-luminous gas giants at wide orbital separations can have intrinsic cooling dominate their photospheric budget. They are favorable for exoplanet direct imaging, especially in the infrared, where their own thermal radiation is easier to separate from the host light. A strongly irradiated hot Jupiter instead has a large stable outer radiative region set mainly by stellar heating; it can be nearly isothermal over a broad pressure range or develop an atmospheric thermal inversion if stellar light is absorbed sufficiently high. Inversion is not inevitable for every strongly irradiated planet. Deep convection begins below its radiative-convective boundary.

The intrinsic curve follows the grey formula. The irradiated curves illustrate possible shapes only; they are not solutions for a specified opacity model. Smaller optical depth corresponds to greater altitude.

For typical well-mixed structures, the dominant processes are:

Representative temperatures must specify the level: Earth has about $288\mathrm{K}$ at the surface (about $255\mathrm{K}$ effective emission temperature); Jupiter has about $165\mathrm{K}$ near one bar (about $125\mathrm{K}$ effective temperature); hot Jupiters commonly have photospheric temperatures of order $1000$–$2500\mathrm{K}$; and the Sun's photosphere is about $5800\mathrm{K}$. Upper layers, nightsides, deep interiors and the solar corona have different temperatures. These are characteristic values, not constant temperatures throughout each atmosphere.

The pressure axis increases downward in the sketches. Solid red segments indicate efficient convection; blue segments indicate mainly radiative transfer. The boundaries are nominal examples, since radiative-convective boundary pressure depends on opacity, gravity and intrinsic flux.

For Earth, the convective troposphere lies beneath a radiative stratosphere, with the transition near $0.1$--$0.2$ bar. The larger solar-system planets likewise have deep convective regions beneath largely radiative upper atmospheres; their tropopause/upper radiative-convective boundary is commonly of order $0.1$--$1$ bar. Their temperatures differ greatly from Earth's, and detached radiative layers can occur deeper down.

For an irradiated hot Jupiter, absorbed stellar flux maintains a hot, extended, relatively shallow-gradient radiative atmosphere. In models with a weak old-planet intrinsic flux, the deep radiative-convective boundary can lie around $10^2$--$10^3$ bar, with a useful wider model-dependent range of tens to thousands of bars. A thermal inversion can appear at low pressures if visible/UV absorption heats the upper atmosphere. Below the deep boundary the profile joins a convective adiabat.

A young, directly imaged exoplanet on a distant orbit is primarily heated from within. Its photosphere commonly joins the convective interior at order $0.1$--$10$ bar, illustrated here at one bar. The temperature generally rises monotonically with pressure over the infrared-forming layers. Strong stellar heating is absent, so a broad stellar-heated isothermal layer is unnecessary.

Two differences in thermal inversions are their absorbers and their formation conditions. Earth's ozone layer and solar-system hydrocarbon absorption can heat upper layers; the proposed hot-Jupiter absorbers include refractory titanium monoxide/vanadium monoxide or other strong visible absorbers, since ozone and methane-rich cold-planet chemistry are unsuitable at very high temperatures. Hot-Jupiter inversions depend strongly on irradiation, atmospheric cold traps and atmospheric transport, and can occur at mbar-to-sub-bar pressures; Earth and the solar-system giants have cooler, established stratospheres above their shallow tropospheres.

Two differences between the hot Jupiter and distant young-giant profiles are external versus internal heating, and the depth/shape of the radiative zone. The former can have a broad warm radiative layer, a much deeper convective boundary and sometimes an inversion; the latter typically has a steeper outward decrease toward a photosphere, a shallower boundary and no irradiation-driven inversion. These are class trends, not a unique temperature profile for every planet.

Take $z$ to increase inward, so the positive coefficient $A$ describes an inward-increasing temperature. Constant gravity and hydrostatic equilibrium give $dP/dz=\rho g$, henceMatching the radiative temperature gradient to the adiabatic temperature gradient gives the formal local boundary relationThe same result follows from radiative diffusion: for constant upward thermal flux $F$ and Rosseland mean opacity $\kappa$, $A=3\kappa F/(16{\sigma }_{\mathrm{SB}})$.

There is an important limitation to treating $A$ as constant over the entire radiative layer. Integration from an irradiated outer boundary givesFor a diatomic ideal gas, ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}=2/7>1/4$, so this profile cannot actually reach a radiative-convective boundary. Formally, imposing a constant ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}$ would givewhich is positive only for $0<{\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}<1/4$. A finite boundary for a normal molecular atmosphere requires additional opacity, flux, or thermodynamic variation. The local matching formula is usable near a real boundary, but constant $A$ is not a complete global model of it. This is the convective stability of a constant-opacity irradiated atmosphere.

For the intended order-of-magnitude scaling, suppose the local values of $g/A$ and ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}$ are comparable for Jupiter and a hot Jupiter, and assume $T_b$ scales with planetary equilibrium temperature. Equal absorbed-flux factors around the same stellar luminosity give $T_b\propto a^{-1/2}$. Taking $a_J=5.2\mathrm{AU}$ and a representative close-in orbit $a_h=0.05\mathrm{AU}$ yieldsThis illustrates how irradiation can push a boundary much deeper. It is a conditional estimate calibrated from the supplied $0.1\mathrm{bar}$ reference, not a self-consistent prediction of the globally constant-$A$ model. Different intrinsic cooling flux, opacity, gravity, or atmospheric metallicity of a giant planet can substantially alter it.

Assume all three planets retain approximately their original hydrogen-helium bulk composition. Stellar encounters change orbital energy and irradiation, not automatically the planet's elemental abundances. Their atmospheric structures can become approximately stationary long before their interiors finish cooling.

For the unperturbed Jupiter-like planet at $a\simeq 5.2\mathrm{au}$, the zero-albedo globally averaged planetary equilibrium temperature is about $122\mathrm{K}$. Stellar light heats the outer atmosphere, while internal cooling supports a deeper temperature gradient and convection. At cooler pressures, chemical equilibrium favors methane and ammonia; condensate clouds can include ammonia at high levels and water deeper down. Disequilibrium chemistry in an exoplanet atmosphere can preserve carbon monoxide or other species from deeper layers.

For the inward-migrated planet at $a\simeq 0.052\mathrm{au}$, the irradiation-only planetary equilibrium temperature is ten times higher, about $1220\mathrm{K}$, because $T_{\mathrm{eq}}\propto a^{-1/2}$. Its irradiated planetary atmosphere has a heated radiative exterior, potentially strong day-night differences, and a deep radiative-convective boundary. At suitable pressures, chemical equilibrium increasingly favors carbon monoxide over methane; water remains important, while alkali absorption and high-temperature condensates can matter. An atmospheric thermal inversion depends on absorbers, clouds, and irradiation and is not guaranteed simply by migration.

The ejected object is a rogue planet. Its irradiation-based planetary equilibrium temperature becomes very small, but its actual emitting temperature is set primarily by internal cooling and Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction. After only several million years it can remain warm and self-luminous, with deep convection and an outward-cooling radiative atmosphere. Its photospheric chemistry and clouds depend on that cooling temperature; they cannot be inferred from the absence of a host star alone. None of these cases fixes an exact pressure-temperature profile without a cooling model, opacities, and atmospheric composition.

Interpret every logarithm in the empirical profile as base ten with the dimensionless argument $P/(1\mathrm{mbar})$. PutThe upper atmosphere has $T=800\mathrm{K}$ for $x\le 0$, while integration of $dT/d{\log }_{10}P=Ax$ below it givesAssume that the stated $1250\mathrm{K}$ planetary equilibrium temperature is a reasonable brightness temperature at the $1\mathrm{bar}=10^3\mathrm{mbar}$ photosphere. ThenAt $10\mathrm{bar}$, $x=4$, and thereforeThis estimate neglects day-night variation, wavelength-dependent photospheric pressure, and a possible radiative-convective boundary; it treats the retrieved profile as representative of the dayside disk.

Hydrostatic balance and the ideal-gas adiabatic temperature gradient implyThe radiative region is stable while $K\rho /T^3<g/c_p$. Equality at the radiative-convective boundary, together with $\rho =\mu P/(\mathcal{R}T)$, givesFor radiative diffusion carrying intrinsic flux $F_{\mathrm{int}}=\sigma T_{\mathrm{int}}^4$, $K=3\kappa F_{\mathrm{int}}/(16\sigma )$, soFor an irradiated hot Jupiter with $g\simeq 10\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$, ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}\simeq 2/7$, $\kappa \simeq 10^{-2}{\mathrm{m}}^2\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}$, $T_{\mathrm{rc}}\simeq 1500\mathrm{K}$, and $T_{\mathrm{int}}\simeq 150$--$200\mathrm{K}$, this gives roughly $P_{\mathrm{rc}}\sim 50$--$200\mathrm{bar}$.

Convection begins when the radiative temperature gradient equals the adiabatic temperature gradient ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}$. To convert optical depth into pressure, assume a pressure-law opacity $\kappa ={\kappa }_0{P}^n$ and constant gravity. Hydrostatic balance givesHenceThe exact radiative-convective boundary is the positive solution ofDeep enough that the exponential term is negligible,which requires $n+1>4{\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}$. This exposes why constant opacity is inadequate for a molecular atmosphere: its limiting radiative gradient is $1/4$, below ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}\simeq 2/7$.

In a grey scaling, $A\sim T_{\mathrm{eq}}^4$ measures irradiation and $B\sim T_{\mathrm{int}}^4$ measures intrinsic flux. ThusFor a hot Jupiter with $T_{\mathrm{eq}}\sim 1500\mathrm{K}$ and $T_{\mathrm{int}}\sim 100\mathrm{K}$, irradiation pushes the boundary to hundreds of bars for typical increasing opacity. Jupiter has $T_{\mathrm{eq}}$ and $T_{\mathrm{int}}$ both of order $10^2\mathrm{K}$ and becomes convective near the bar scale. The estimate is order-of-magnitude because real opacities depend on both pressure and temperature.

A useful first estimate places the radiative-convective boundary where the intrinsic term becomes comparable to the deep irradiation plateau:ThusWith the assumptions of part (b), $g=10\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$ and ${\kappa }_{\mathrm{IR}}=10^{-3}{\mathrm{m}}^2\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}$, one finds ${\tau }_{\mathrm{RCB}}\sim 6.2\times 10^3$ and $P_{\mathrm{RCB}}\sim 6.2\times 10^7\mathrm{Pa}\simeq 620\mathrm{bar}$.

More precisely one equates the local radiative logarithmic gradient to the adiabatic gradient. A constant-opacity grey profile approaches ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{rad}}=1/4$, so a diatomic adiabat with ${\nabla }_{\mathrm{ad}}=2/7$ requires the realistic increase of opacity with depth to become convective. The numerical pressure is therefore an order-of-magnitude estimate, sensitive mainly to $T_{\mathrm{int}}$ and deep opacity.

This model solves a vertical atmospheric pressure-temperature profile consistent with heating, radiative transfer and a convective adjustment where the radiative gradient exceeds the adiabatic temperature gradient. Irradiation, intrinsic flux, gravity and opacity determine the radiative-convective boundary. A one-dimensional model describes a column or average rather than resolving all atmospheric winds.