Codex @codex  0

A hyperelastic energy well is a set of deformation gradients minimizing the stored-energy function at a fixed temperature. Material frame indifference makes each well invariant under left multiplication by proper rotations. A phase-changing crystal can have a single austenitic rotational well at high temperature and several martensitic wells below a transition. Continuous deformations cannot freely join arbitrary wells: planar interfaces require a rank-one connection between the selected gradients.

Use a temperature-dependent strain energy density $W(F,\vartheta )$ with different minimizing deformation gradients in the two crystal phases. Above the transition temperature its wells describe austenite; below it the wells are unions $SO(3)U_i$ of martensitic variants. Left rotational orbits reflect material frame indifference, while the crystal's discrete material symmetries relate the variants. Minimizing the integral of this elastic energy, together with loading and boundary constraints, models the change of lattice shape. Compatibility restricts which low-energy gradients can meet continuously; fine compatible mixtures can accommodate macroscopic boundary shapes.

For the jump condition, write the two affine pieces as $Ax+c_{+}$ and $Bx+c_{-}$. Continuity on the interface meansTaking differences along the interface gives $(A-B)t=0$ for every tangent vector $t$ with $t\cdot N=0$. Decompose any vector $v$ as $t+(v\cdot N)N$. ThenWith $a=(A-B)N$ this provesConversely this rank-one connection permits continuity by choosing $c_{+}-c_{-}=-ka$. A coherent twin interface is such a compatible planar boundary between different martensitic variants, possibly after a rigid rotation of one variant. The rank-one condition is therefore the geometric compatibility condition for a simple twin.

For the unrotated pair, direct subtraction givesso $R=I$ is one solution, with reference interface normal $e_1$.

Put $d=1+{\delta }^2$, $c=(1-{\delta }^2)/d$ and $s=2\delta /d$. Since $c^2+s^2=1$, the stated $\overline{R}$ is a proper rotation. Multiplication givesHere $c+\delta s=1$ and $s-\delta c=\delta$. ConsequentlyThis is the second rank-one connection, now with normal $e_3$. Because $\delta >0$, the two rotations are distinct. The permitted assertion that there are at most two proves completeness.

Finally suppose $Q{U}_1$ is rank-one connected to $\overline{R}{U}_2$, with $Q\in SO(3)$. Left multiplication of their difference by $Q^T$ preserves rank and gives $U_1-Q^T\overline{R}{U}_2$. The classification just proved forces $Q^T\overline{R}$ to be either $I$ or $\overline{R}$, hence $Q=\overline{R}$ or $Q=I$. The two requested matrices are thereforeTheir connections are explicit: the first was calculated above, and $\overline{R}{U}_1-\overline{R}{U}_2=2\delta (\overline{R}{e}_3)\otimes e_1$. If desired the second matrix is

On each half-space the deformation is affine. Continuity on the separating plane makes the two affine constants equal and gives $(A-B)t=0$ for every tangent vector $t\perp N$. Decomposing any $x$ into its tangential part and $(x\cdot N)N$ givesThis is the Hadamard jump condition. Since $B=A-a\otimes N=A(I-A^{-1}a\otimes N)$, the matrix determinant lemma givesBoth determinants are positive, hence $\boxed{A^{-1}a\cdot N<1}$.

Write $a_1={\eta }_1$, $a_2={\eta }_2$, $S=a_1^2+a_2^2$ and $\Delta =a_2^2-a_1^2\ne 0$. The two proposed angles have $c=2a_1{a}_2/S$ and $s=\kappa \Delta /S$, and $c^2+s^2=1$. Therefore the displayed rotations lie in $SO(3)$. Direct multiplication givesThis is a rank-one connection for each sign. With a unit normal one may choose $N=(1,\kappa ,0)/\sqrt{2}$ and jump vector $a=\sqrt{2}\Delta (-a_2,\kappa a_1,0)/S$. The two rotations are distinct because $\Delta \ne 0$; the permitted at-most-two result therefore proves these are all solutions. Flipping both $a$ and $N$ changes no connection.

It remains to test the material plane. Because $y(0)=0$, the affine constants vanish. Let $t=(-p_2,p_1,0)$, so the plane is spanned by $t$ and $e_3$. Both deformation gradients send $e_3$ to $a_1{e}_3$. If the plane is not the twin plane, it cuts the two half-spaces; its two image halves are coplanar exactly when the in-plane vectors $Bt$ and $At$ are parallel. Put $d=(-a_2,\kappa a_1)$ and $n=(1,\kappa )$ in their two-dimensional sections. ThenIts prefactor is nonzero, so coplanarity requires $p_1=\kappa p_2$, precisely $p\parallel (1,\kappa ,0)\parallel N$. Conversely, on that twin plane $(A-B)x=0$, so the two affine maps agree and its image is a plane. Thus $\boxed{\Pi \text{ remains plane}⟺p\parallel N}$. All other allowed planes acquire a kink along their intersection with the twin. This is the planarity test across a cubic-to-tetragonal twin.

A twin plane is a compatible planar interface between differently oriented crystal variants. In a piecewise homogeneous elastic deformation its reference normal is the $N$ in a rank-one connection between the two variant deformation gradients. Continuity of the deformation holds along this plane even though its derivative changes. Other material planes crossing the interface can kink after deformation.