The rat dorsal air sac assay is an experimental bioassay of angiogenesis in which locally presented material is evaluated by the vascular response of tissue bordering a dorsal air space. It was used to test whether material derived from tumours could promote new blood vessels, connecting biochemical separation with a visible biological effect.
In the 1971 study by Judah Folkman, Ezio Merler, Charles Abernathy and Gretchen Williams, early experiments used membrane chambers containing live tumour cells. For testing separated material, the apparatus used silicone tubing with side openings covered by a short membrane sleeve. That sleeve acted as a diffusing wick, not as a filter. After 48 hours the vascular response was inspected with a stereomicroscope at magnification, followed by collection of sections for histology.[ref]
Isolation of a Tumor Factor Responsible for Angiogenesis by Judah Folkman and others. Printed p.279, Biological Assay of TAF and Reading the Air Sac Assay; Figure1
The investigators graded vascular proliferation from 0 to 5+. Their illustrations show a wick without the active preparation as a negative control and progressively stronger vascular responses to active material.[ref]
Isolation of a Tumor Factor Responsible for Angiogenesis by Judah Folkman and others. Figures2–4 and captions
The scientific question is whether the preparation alters the vascular response relative to an appropriate control. A visible response is not automatically a count of endothelial cells, a measured cell proliferation rate or evidence of functional perfusion.An original scoring example shows why numerical coding must follow the measurement. Suppose one group receives grades 1, 1 and 4, and another receives 2, 2 and 2. Both arithmetic means are 2, although the response patterns differ. Moreover, the ordered relabeling , , preserves the ranking but changes those means to 4 and 2. An ordered grade alone therefore does not define an interval scale on which differences have a fixed physical meaning. This example is not a reconstruction of the historical observations.
A useful contemporary comparison would specify the test material, solvent control, observation time and scoring rule, and keep the observer unaware of group assignment. Histology and explicit vessel measurements can help distinguish new vascular growth from dilation or local tissue disturbance. Such refinements answer additional measurement questions; this assay does not by itself identify a single angiogenic molecule or demonstrate a treatment effect in human cancer.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.