Activator in a reaction-diffusion system 2026-10-14
An activator in an activator-inhibitor reaction–diffusion system is a species whose local feedback enhances activation. Near a homogeneous equilibrium, positive self-feedback is reflected in the corresponding diagonal entry of the reaction Jacobian matrix. Cross-coupling to an inhibitor and differing diffusion rates can generate a Turing instability.
Cubic fast-slow reaction-diffusion model Created 2026-10-20 Updated 2026-10-31
This nondimensional two-variable reaction–diffusion system combines a fast cubic local response with slow negative feedback. With , , and , its spatially uniform rest state at is linearly stable: the Jacobian has trace and determinant . For suitable parameters a finite perturbation can nevertheless cause a large excursion followed by recovery. Frozen recovery gives a bistable cubic reaction-diffusion equation; the full coupled travelling-wave boundary-value problem determines whether front pairs form a pulse. This is a generic excitable-medium formulation of the FitzHugh-Nagumo model, without assigning any biological variable or application.
Inhibitor in a reaction-diffusion system 2026-10-14
An inhibitor in an activator-inhibitor reaction–diffusion system suppresses the activator. Its diffusion and reaction feedback can stabilize a spatially uniform state while allowing some nonzero wavenumbers to grow through a Turing instability.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ii Paper 2 13E a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Choose the nondimensionalizationThe chain rule gives and . Dividing the first equation by and the second by gives the required scaled reaction–diffusion system. Positive degradation and diffusion constants are assumed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 3 13B i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The reaction–diffusion system for amoebae contains local reproduction and density-dependent loss , giving carrying density . The term describes diffusion with coefficient one. The chemotaxis flux is , so its contribution to the conservation equation is . Attraction towards greater chemical concentration requires at the relevant positive densities; negative values would mean repulsion, and zero removes the chemotactic response.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 74 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For linear stability analysis of a general stable two-species reaction–diffusion system, take Fourier modes proportional to . Their matrix is . Put , , and . ThenThe full system is stable precisely when and for every allowed mode. If the homogeneous state is stable, the trace already decreases with ; only the determinant can change sign. If , its minimum for is at zero. If , it is at . Thus the two-species Turing criterion for instability on a continuum of wavenumbers isStrict stability has together with the homogeneous conditions. Equality at positive marks a stationary neutral mode. At that first onset,Beyond threshold, the growing band lies between the positive roots , as long as the homogeneous trace stays negative.
For the Brusselator, . Write . The stationary determinant threshold gives the Turing threshold of the Brusselator in dimensional diffusivities:For this to be a genuine diffusion-driven loss of stability, it must occur before the homogeneous Hopf bifurcation threshold. The Brusselator Turing-before-Hopf diffusivity condition isIndeed is equivalent to . With this strict inequality, contains a spatially unstable but homogeneously stable interval. If the ratio condition fails, the first linear instability as increases is homogeneous at , rather than a Turing instability; equality gives simultaneous neutral homogeneous and finite-wavenumber modes. Equal diffusivities cannot produce a Turing instability.
These continuum formulas assume the onset wavenumber is available. On a finite domain with a specified discrete mode set, the discrete-mode Turing threshold for the Brusselator isprovided this minimum is below . The question supplies no boundary geometry, so the continuous-mode onset above is the usual answer; this last expression states how a finite-size restriction changes it.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 3 6C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
With the travelling wave coordinate , the reaction–diffusion system becomesAt the advancing leading edge the healthy-tissue density is small. Put with . The linearization at givesso a nonoscillatory decaying front requires real positive roots,The pulled travelling front selects the Fisher-KPP minimum wave speed, and therefore
For the initial wound , two mirror-image fronts enter from its endpoints. The left front moves right from and the right front moves left from , each with speed approximately . A sequence of sketches would show the initial rectangular depression becoming two smooth monotone transition layers, the zero-density plateau shrinking, and the two layers meeting near before the profile relaxes to . Their meeting time isThere is an additional local relaxation time of order if “close to one” is assigned a fixed numerical tolerance, so the displayed estimate is the dominant healing time when is large compared with the front width .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 355 1 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Write the reaction terms asA nonzero homogeneous equilibrium satisfies and , henceFor physically positive populations it exists exactly when
The reaction Jacobian matrix at this equilibrium isIts trace and determinant areThe equilibrium is therefore stable to spatially uniform perturbations when
For a spatial Fourier mode of wavenumber , put . The linearized reaction–diffusion system has matrixIts trace is smaller than , whileThe two-species diffusion-driven instability criterion says that this upward-opening quadratic becomes negative for some precisely whenCombining all conditions, a Turing instability may occur in the region
At onset the discriminant vanishes, and the double root isThe threshold relation givesso the critical wavenumber isIf , uniform stability requires whereas diffusion-driven instability requires . These inequalities are incompatible, so the Turing region vanishes.
TODO: biological interpretations and organism-specific propagation are user-deferred. The notes below concern only generic excitable reaction–diffusion systems.
A front solution joins different asymptotic states in space. In a reaction–diffusion system, local nonlinear dynamics select possible states while diffusion couples neighboring points. A travelling wave with profile , , converts a partial differential equation into a boundary value problem for the shape and speed. A pulse instead returns to the same resting state on both sides and can contain leading and trailing fronts.
A useful nondimensional cubic fast-slow reaction-diffusion model, in a convention of the FitzHugh-Nagumo model, iswhere , , and . Here is a fast activation variable, a slow negative-feedback variable and a generic drive; no physiological variable is assigned. Without spatial coupling, nullclines are and . At , the resting state has Jacobian matrixIt has linear stability. With appropriate parameter choices a sufficiently large perturbation makes a fast excursion to the other outer branch of the cubic, followed by slow feedback and return. Thus a stable rest state can be excitable without being linearly unstable. Other parameters or applied drive can yield multiple equilibria or oscillations; these behaviours should not be asserted for every parameter set.
The fast-subsystem front can be obtained explicitly by freezing . For the bistable cubic reaction-diffusion equation, are stable and is unstable. The decreasing logistic front of a bistable cubic equation isTo check it, and substitution into cancels every term. For , the high state advances to the right; for , the direction reverses. At the front is stationary. More generally, multiplying the travelling-wave equation by and integrating yieldsThis links propagation direction to the bias between the two stable states and recovers Maxwell balance for a scalar reaction-diffusion front at zero speed. It is a bistable selected-speed problem, rather than a universal Fisher-type minimum-speed formula.
For the coupled fast-slow system, travelling profiles satisfyA slow recovery wake can support a return front behind the advancing fast front, producing a travelling pulse for suitable parameters. Its width reflects the slow recovery time and propagation speed, while each sharp edge has the faster diffusion–reaction scale. The frozen-recovery speed above is a controlled subsystem result, not an exact speed for every coupled pulse. A definite pulse speed requires parameters and connecting boundary condition; none are specified by this brief-note question.
A generic chemical reaction–diffusion system couples local kinetics to spatial transport:A homogeneous stationary state satisfies . Let its reaction Jacobian be . Local well-mixed stability requires and . A Fourier perturbation of wavevector magnitude evolves under , whose determinant isSince its trace remains negative, a diffusion-driven stationary instability appears if the determinant becomes negative for some allowed wavevector. In a spatially large domain the conditions areTogether with reaction-only stability, these give a finite unstable wavelength range. Equal diffusion coefficients cannot generate this instability: they simply shift each reaction eigenvalue by . On a finite domain, an admissible spatial eigenmode must actually lie in the unstable band. Nonlinearities then determine saturation and whether a predicted pattern is stable, so a linear unstable band alone does not calculate a final pattern.[ref]
Other kinetics support travelling fronts or oscillatory waves rather than a stationary pattern. For instance, the scalar abstract equation has a pulled-front speed for a sufficiently steep invading initial profile. Here it is used as an abstract kinetics-and-diffusion example, without a biological interpretation. The ratio of diffusion time to reaction time characterizes whether spatial mixing is rapid enough to justify a well-mixed model.
Quadratic activator-inhibitor model 2026-10-14
For positive concentrations and positive parameters, this reaction–diffusion system has homogeneous equilibrium and reaction Jacobian matrix . Its trace is and determinant is , making the equilibrium reaction-stable exactly when . Stable complex eigenvalues permit damped oscillations, which must be distinguished from sustained periodic oscillations.
Spatially homogeneous equilibrium Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A spatially homogeneous equilibrium of a reaction–diffusion system is a constant state satisfying . Since its spatial derivatives vanish, its stability to homogeneous perturbations is determined by the Jacobian matrix ; diffusion can additionally destabilize nonconstant modes.

