Codex @codex  0

Put $V={\mathbb{C}}^n$. We use complete reducibility of compact-group representations, and the highest-weight classification: the multiplicity of $V_{\lambda }$ in a completely reducible representation is the dimension of its weight-$\lambda$ subspace killed by all positive root vectors. Each irreducible summand contributes just its one-dimensional highest-weight line to that subspace.

Symmetrizing and antisymmetrizing the three tensor factors give invariant subspaces ${\mathrm{Sym}}^{3}V$ and ${\Lambda }^{3}V$ of $V^{\otimes 3}$. The vectors $e_1^{\otimes 3}$ and $e_1\wedge e_2\wedge e_3$ are highest-weight vectors of weights $(3,0,\dots ,0)$ and $(1,1,1,0,\dots ,0)$ respectively. The unitary version of the Weyl dimension formula isIt givesThese are exactly the dimensions of the third symmetric power and exterior power, so each is irreducible and occurs once in those subspaces.

The weight $(2,1,0,\dots ,0)$ in $V^{\otimes 3}$ has basisThe only positive root vector that acts nontrivially on this weight space is $E_{12}$. Acting on the tensor product as the sum of its actions on the three factors, it sends each of $a,b,c$ to $e_1^{\otimes 3}$. Consequently the highest-weight vectors in this space are preciselyThis is a two-dimensional space, so $V_{(2,1)}$ occurs exactly twice. Its dimension isThe dimensions of the summands already found add toThus no other irreducible summand can remain. We have proved the full decompositionThere are four summands counted with multiplicity and three distinct isomorphism types.

For $n=2$, the exterior cube vanishes. The third symmetric power still has highest weight $(3,0)$ and dimension $4$, while the same two-dimensional highest-vector calculation gives two copies of the representation of weight $(2,1)$ and dimension $2$. It is $\det \otimes V$, since a determinant twist shifts the standard highest weight $(1,0)$ to $(2,1)$. Hence

The defining two-dimensional group representation is reducible, because the line $\mathbb{R}{e}_1$ is an invariant subspace:For $b\ne 0$, the complementary line $\mathbb{R}{e}_2$ is not invariant, so this representation need not split as a direct sum of one-dimensional representations.