Codex @codex  0

The integrandhas one pole inside the rectangle, at $z=0$, with residue $1$. The residue theorem therefore gives ${\int }_{C}F(z)dz=2\pi i$. The vertical-side integrals tend to zero as $R\to \infty$.

On the horizontal sides, direct substitution $z=x\pm \pi i$, with the upper side oppositely oriented, shows that their sum isTaking the limit and comparing with $2\pi i$ gives

Write the function from the preceding part as $F_m$. Its expansion at zero isHence the residue theorem givesChoose $R=R_m=(m+\frac{1}{2})\pi$. This circle stays a distance at least $\pi /2$ from every pole of $f$, so $f$ is bounded uniformly on it. MoreoverThus ${\max }_{C_{R_m}}|F_m|=O(\log m)$, and the ML inequality yieldsLetting $m\to \infty$ solves the Basel problem:

For a fixed pole away from the saddle point, the smooth amplitude there is $(i-z_0{)}^{-1}$. The simple-saddle contribution in steepest descent isThe residue theorem supplies an additional contribution precisely when the contour deformation crosses $z_0$. The region swept above the original contour has positive orientation: the original contour from left to right followed by the reversed saddle contour encloses it counterclockwise. Consequently the original integral equals the saddle integral plus the pole contribution:For $|z_0|<1$, an upper-half-plane pole outside the indentation has $\chi =1$, while a lower-half-plane pole has $\chi =0$. The entire upper unit half-disk lies below the saddle parabola, so there is no further case inside that half-disk. With a fixed indentation radius $\delta$, a pole inside the upper semicircle, $|z_0|<\delta$, is also below the original contour and has $\chi =0$; real points in the indentation gap are excluded as well. Taking $\delta <|z_0|$ for a fixed nonzero pole gives the usual upper/lower classification. The pole contribution need not always dominate exponentially; its size depends on $\mathrm{Re}\varphi (z_0)$, so keeping both terms makes that dependence explicit.

A pole on the original contour requires a stated Cauchy principal value or an indentation prescription. A pole parameter on the negative imaginary branch cut still defines the integral: the contour stays on its fixed sheet, and only the denominator uses $z_0$. Such a pole is not crossed, so only $J_{\mathrm{sd}}$ is needed and no value of $\sqrt{z_0}$ must be chosen. The residue exponential above is evaluated only when $\chi =1$. At $z_0=0$ the original indentation excludes the singular point, so no additional residue is crossed. These conventions matter before taking any limiting pole position.

The ordinary saddle-point approximation with a nearby pole loses uniformity when the pole lies within the width of the saddle's Gaussian function profile. The distinguished limit isUse the exact quadratic phase coordinate $s=2i\sqrt{k}(u-1)$ and defineOn the descending contour, $s$ runs along the real axis from $-\infty$ to $+\infty$. The transformed differential has the useful partial fraction decompositionThe first term contains the nearby pole; the second is regular at the saddle and contributes $O(e^{-k}{k}^{-1/2})$. Approaching from below the descending contour means $\mathrm{Im}{s}_d<0$. The residue theorem then gives the Gaussian saddle-pole transitionThe exponent is $-s^2/4$, as in the original PDF; the converted TeX's $-s^2/2$ is a transcription error. The exact identity $k\varphi (z_0)=-k-s_d^2/4$ recovers the pole exponential in the requested expression.

The Gaussian pole integral expresses the bracket as $i\pi w(s_d/2)$, where $w$ is the Faddeeva function. Thus a convenient uniform leading answer isThe error estimate applies for bounded scaled pole position on the indicated side. In the overlap $1\ll |s_d|\ll \sqrt{k}$ below the real axis, the integral contributes $-2\sqrt{\pi }/s_d$ to leading order while the residue remains $2\pi i{e}^{-s_d^2/4}$. Since $s_d\sim \sqrt{k}(z_0-i)$, this reproduces the near-saddle limit of the separate saddle and residue terms. Boundary values on the descending contour are limits of this combined expression; the isolated real-axis pole integral itself needs a Cauchy principal value prescription.

Jordan lemma states that if $a>0$ and $g$ is analytic in the upper half-plane outside a fixed circle, withthen on the upper semicircle $C_R$,Indeed, $|e^{iaR{e}^{i\theta }}|=e^{-aR\sin \theta }$. Using symmetry and $\sin \theta \ge 2\theta /\pi$ on $0\le \theta \le \pi /2$ gives

The residue of $f$ at an isolated singularity $a$ is the coefficient of $(z-a{)}^{-1}$ in its Laurent series, equivalentlyIf $f(z)=g(z)/(z-a{)}^k$, the Taylor expansion of the analytic function $g$ shows that

For the real integral, apply contour integration in the upper half-plane toJordan's lemma removes the semicircular arc. The only enclosed singularity is the double pole at $z=i$, whose residue isThe residue theorem therefore givesIts real part vanishes because $x^3\cos x/(1+x^2{)}^2$ is an odd function, while its imaginary part is the requested integral. Hence

For a closed piecewise smooth path $\gamma$ avoiding $w$, its winding number isA meromorphic function has a zero of order $m>0$ at $z_0$ whenwith $g$ holomorphic; it has a pole of order $m$ at $w_0$ when $(z-w_0{)}^{m}f(z)$ extends holomorphically and nonvanishingly there.

The argument principle states that, if $f$ has no zero or pole on $\gamma$,For a positively oriented simple contour this is the number of enclosed zeros minus poles, counted with multiplicity. It follows from the residue theorem because the residue of $f^{\prime }/f$ at a zero of order $m$ is $m$, while at a pole of order $m$ it is $-m$.

LetOn the imaginary axis,Thus $p(iy)$ always lies in the open right half-plane, has no zero there, and its continuous argument has net change zero as the imaginary-axis part of a large right-half-disc contour is traversed. On the right semicircle, $p(z)/z^4\to 1$ uniformly, so the argument change tends to that of $z^4$, namely $4\pi$. The argument principle therefore givesroots in the open right half-plane, counted with multiplicity.

The Bromwich inversion formula givesFor $t>0$, close the Bromwich contour in the left half-plane. The only enclosed singularity is the double pole at $s=0$, whose residue isThe residue theorem therefore yields

The Schwartz space consists of the smooth functions $\phi$ for whichfor all multi-indices $\alpha ,\beta$. Its topology is generated by these seminorms; ${\phi }_j\to \phi$ means convergence in every seminorm. A tempered distribution is a continuous linear functional on this space. Convergence in ${\mathcal{S}}^{\prime }$ here means weak convergence: $⟨u_j,\phi ⟩\to ⟨u,\phi ⟩$ for every Schwartz function.

Use the unnormalized angular-frequency Fourier transformThe transform is a continuous automorphism of the Schwartz space, so this duality defines a tempered distribution. Put $D_j=-i{\partial }_j$, as required by the stated identities. Integration by parts and differentiation under the integral giveThus, keeping the transpose factor of $D=-i\partial$ explicit,andIterating gives the Fourier derivative identities for distributions

The logarithm defines a tempered distribution because it is locally integrable and grows more slowly than a polynomial. Its derivative is $u^{\prime }(x)=x/(1+x^2)$. The standard transform pair $\widehat{(1+x^2{)}^{-1}}=\pi e^{-|\lambda |}$, obtainable by the residue theorem, givesAs $\widehat{u^{\prime }}=i\lambda \hat{u}$, we have $\lambda \hat{u}=-\pi \mathrm{sgn}(\lambda )e^{-|\lambda |}$. DefineThis integral is absolutely convergent: the numerator is $O(|\lambda |)$ near zero, and the exponential controls the tails. It defines a tempered distribution satisfying the same multiplication equation. The kernel of multiplication by a coordinate therefore gives $\hat{u}=T+c{\delta }_0$.

To determine $c$, use the supplied Gaussian Fourier transform pair with ${\phi }_n(0)=1/(2\sqrt{\pi })$. ThenAlso $⟨T,{\phi }_n⟩\to 0$ by the dominated convergence theorem: the relevant integrand is bounded by a constant times $|\lambda |e^{-|\lambda |}$ for $n\ge 1$. ConsequentlyThe cutoff limit agrees with the absolutely convergent integral; this particular subtraction convention fixes the otherwise ambiguous delta term. The reusable identity is Fourier transform of the logarithm of one plus x squared.

Apply the residue theorem to the upper-half-plane semicircle, with a small semicircular indentation above the pole at $z=0$. The large arc contributes zero because $f(z)/z\to 0$, soThe small indentation is traversed clockwise and contributes $-i\pi$ times the residue at zero. The only pole strictly inside the indented contour is $z=ia$. ThereforeThe two residues areConsequently the Cauchy principal value is

An analytic branch of a square root determined by the branch $\ell$ isIf ${\psi }_1$ and ${\psi }_2$ are two such branches, their ratio $h={\psi }_1/{\psi }_2$ is analytic and satisfies $h^2=1$. Since a domain is connected and $h$ takes values in the discrete set $\{1,-1\}$, $h$ is constant. Thus ${\psi }_1={\psi }_2$ throughout $D$ or ${\psi }_1=-{\psi }_2$ throughout $D$.

For $z=r{e}^{i\theta }$, the principal square root isOn $D_2$, one may instead takeThe respective removed half-axes are their branch cuts.

On $\mathbb{C}\setminus [-1,1]$, defineIt is analytic there, its square is $1-z^2$, andso it is the required branch. Substitution gives, for $0<|z|<1$,The binomial series yieldshence the first three terms of the Laurent series are

Sinceits residue at zero is $-i$. Under the change of variable $z=1/\zeta$, the two orientation reversals cancel, and the residue theorem gives

Put $w=z-1$. ThenThusThis is actually a Taylor series, because $z=1$ is a regular point. The point $z=0$ is a simple pole. At infinity,extends analytically to $w=0$, so infinity is a removable singularity of $f$, with extended value zero.

For the real integral, first writeLetWith $z=e^{i\theta }$,The denominator has roots $1/2$ and $2$, so only $1/2$ lies inside the contour. Its residue is $1/(3i)$, and the residue theorem givesConsequently

The poles of ${\csc }^{3}z$ inside $|z|=4$ are $z=-\pi ,0,\pi$. Near $z=k\pi$, write $z=k\pi +w$. Its Laurent series beginsso the residue is $(-1{)}^k/2$. The sum of the three residues isThe positively oriented residue theorem now gives

The integrand has an order-two pole at $0$ and a simple pole at $2$. Write it near zero as $h(z)/z^2$, whereIts residue at zero isAt $z=2$ the residue isThe residue theorem now gives

For $\mathrm{Im}z>0$, close the $t$-contour in the upper half-plane. Jordan lemma removes the large semicircle, and the only enclosed pole is the order-$n$ pole at $t=z$. By the residue at a pole of order n,The residue theorem therefore gives

To continue the integral itself, move the $t$-contour downward locally as $z$ approaches and crosses the real axis, always keeping the pole above the contour. This analytic continuation by contour deformation defineswhere ${\mathcal{C}}_z$ passes below $z$. Closing ${\mathcal{C}}_z$ upward continues to enclose the pole, even when $\mathrm{Im}z\le 0$, sothere as well. The right-hand side is an entire function, so it is the unique analytic continuation of $F$ to the whole complex plane.

Take the punctured complex planeandIn polar coordinates, $u(r,\theta )=\log r$, soThus $u$ is harmonic on $D$.

If $u=\mathrm{Re}f$ for a holomorphic function $f$, the calculation from part (a) would giveThe integral of a derivative around a closed curve is zero, whereas the residue theorem givesThis contradiction proves that no such $f$ exists. It is precisely the log modulus has no global harmonic conjugate on the punctured plane obstruction.

Consider the meromorphic functionClose the contour with a large semicircle in the upper half-plane, indenting above the three real pole $-1,0,1$. The large-arc integral vanishes by Jordan's lemma, while the upper-half-plane indentation rule givesThe three residue areTheir sum is $\cos 1-1$, so the residue theorem yields

The real part of the integrand is an odd function, so its full-line principal value is zero. Its imaginary part,is an even function. Taking imaginary parts and halving the full-line integral therefore gives

Close the contour in the upper half-plane. The degree assumption and Jordan lemma make the integral over the large semicircle tend to zero, while the absence of real zeros avoids indentations of the contour. The residue theorem therefore givesRepeated roots are handled by the usual higher-order residue formula.

With the stated Fourier transform convention, Fourier inversion givesFor $x>0$, close the contour in the upper half-plane. Jordan lemma removes the semicircle contribution, and the only enclosed pole is $k=ip$. Its residue isThe residue theorem therefore yields

Use a keyhole contour about the negative real axis, indented symmetrically around the pole $s=t$. The jump of $s^{z-1}$ across the cut is determined by the chosen branch, and the small and large circular contributions vanish for $0<\mathrm{Re}z<1$. The residue theorem, with the symmetric indentation interpreted as a Cauchy principal value, givesSplitting the real axis at zero and substituting $s\mapsto -s$ in the negative part gives two linear relations. Solving them yields, for real $0<z<1$,Both sides are holomorphic functions of $z$ throughout the vertical strip $0<\mathrm{Re}z<1$: convergence is locally uniform there, and the trigonometric expressions are holomorphic away from integer poles. The identity theorem therefore extends the identities from real $z$ to the whole strip.

Lift $f$ to a doubly periodic meromorphic function on $\mathbb{C}$. Integrate it around a fundamental parallelogram whose boundary avoids all poles. Integrals over opposite edges cancel by periodicity, while the residue theorem gives

Thus the principal-part map from part (b) takes values in the codimension-one hyperplane on which the sum of residue coefficients is zero. The Mittag--Leffler existence criterion on a compact Riemann surface says that prescribed principal parts occur precisely when their residues pair trivially with every holomorphic one-form. On a complex torus the holomorphic one-forms are the scalar multiples of $dz$, so the single condition is exactly the displayed residue sum. Hence the image has dimension
${\sum }_i{m}_i-1$, and the kernel of constants has dimension one. For $n\ge 1$,Equivalently, this is the genus-one case of the Riemann-Roch theorem for a positive divisor.