Use natural units and the unreduced Planck mass ; it is times the reduced Planck mass. A homogeneous canonical inflaton has and . Vacuum domination by a scalar field requires , with other matter and the curvature term negligible in the Friedmann equation. The equation-of-state parameter is then near , and the Friedmann acceleration equation gives accelerating expansion.
For sustained slow-roll inflation, Hubble friction must dominate the inflaton acceleration: , with the scalar potential changing only slightly in one Hubble time. In terms of the potential slow-roll parameter and second potential slow-roll parameter, this requires
For the quartic scalar potential,
Thus supplies a broad slow-roll range when . At an initial density of order the Planck density, potential domination gives
so both potential slow-roll parameters are small for small . Small initial kinetic energy is a separate condition; the height of the scalar potential alone does not enforce it. These classical equations describe the post-Planck evolution under the model assumptions, rather than resolving quantum gravity at the initial endpoint.
Take ; the negative branch follows by the symmetry . Dropping kinetic energy from the Friedmann equation and acceleration from the inflaton equation of motion gives
Writing , the quartic-potential slow-roll solution is
Indeed, , and integrating gives . These expressions apply during slow-roll inflation; their formal late-time saturation must not be used beyond the end of that approximation.
The exact end of accelerating expansion is , equivalently for the scalar-dominated flat model. The quartic-inflation endpoint estimate uses the leading potential condition , giving
The numerical coefficient is an endpoint estimate: the slow-roll approximation breaks down there. Imposing estimates when slow roll loses accuracy and gives a different order-one coefficient, not a different exact acceleration condition.
The slow-roll e-fold count is
The quartic-inflation expansion from Planck density combines this initial estimate with the conventional endpoint to give
For small the dominant term is enormous; the order-one endpoint uncertainty does not affect that conclusion.
To estimate the reheating temperature, assume prompt, efficient reheating converts the end-of-inflation energy into a thermal radiation bath. With the same endpoint convention, , and equating this to the radiation energy density gives
The quartic-inflation prompt-reheating estimate fixes the scaling; the endpoint kinetic energy changes the coefficient by order one. Without an inflaton coupling and its thermalization history, alone cannot specify the actual reheating temperature.
Finally, during cosmic inflation the comoving Hubble radius decreases:
An initially causally connected patch is enlarged enough that the present observable region can lie within it. Its portions may subsequently be far outside one another's Hubble radii while retaining their common earlier thermal history. This solves the horizon problem if the number of e-folds is sufficiently large, conventionally of order sixty for the relevant thermal history; can readily exceed that. The necessary count depends on reheating and later expansion. The causal mechanism and the conversion back to a hot universe are discussed in David Tong's account of inflation.
The slow-roll equations turn the slow-roll curvature power spectrum into
The spectral tilt is the logarithmic derivative of this dimensionless spectrum. Apply the horizon-exit logarithmic derivative in slow roll:
With the potential slow-roll parameter above and the second potential slow-roll parameter ,
This is the first-order departure of the scalar spectral index from unity, in reduced Planck units.
At horizon exit , , where is the Hubble slow-roll parameter. To leading slow-roll order,
The slow-roll curvature power spectrum is proportional to . Therefore the scalar spectral index in potential slow-roll parameters is
Using the potential slow-roll parameter and the second potential slow-roll parameter gives
The neglected horizon-exit derivative correction contributes at higher slow-roll order.
Apply the horizon-exit derivative from part (d) to the potential slow-roll parameter and the second potential slow-roll parameter. The potential slow-roll flow equations are
where the third potential slow-roll parameter is . For example, differentiating gives , which is the second expression. Differentiating now gives the running of the scalar spectral index
This is the leading second-order slow-roll running. The notation denotes a signed derivative combination and does not force its value to be nonnegative.
Derive both cases from , using the positive-field branch. The potential slow-roll parameter and second potential slow-roll parameter are
Taking the leading inflation-end estimate , the remaining number of e-folds is
The corresponding monomial-inflation curvature amplitude and tilt are
In particular,
The quartic case is redder. Its small- matter envelope is instead of ; its high- envelope is instead of . With the late cosmology fixed, the turnover and baryonic acoustic scale do not move. If the spectra are matched in amplitude at a pivot , their ratio is approximately
This gives more large-scale power and less small-scale power relative to the pivot, with about a relative tilt across two decades in wavenumber.
The quartic coefficient is not specified, so changing the power of the potential does not by itself specify the overall amplitude. If and the quartic coefficient is , the formula above gives, at the same ,
Consequently choosing the same dimensionful coefficient would give a very different normalization, whereas choosing matches the pivot amplitude. These are different normalization choices, not a universal amplitude prediction from a quartic shape alone.
The slow-roll approximation neglects relative to and kinetic energy relative to the potential. It is self-consistent on the attractor when the potential slow-roll parameter and the second potential slow-roll parameter . Thus
Here, as in the inflaton equations, denotes the reduced Planck mass, not the unreduced mass used in the thermal calculation. The slow-roll curvature power spectrum becomes
so
To differentiate with respect to horizon-exit scale, write , increasing with physical time. Along the slow-roll trajectory,
The difference between differentiating with respect to and contributes only at second slow-roll order to the tilt. Since ,
Therefore the scalar spectral index in potential slow-roll parameters is
All background quantities in these expressions are evaluated when the particular mode exits the Hubble radius.
The first Hubble slow-roll parameter measures the fractional change of per number of e-folds, and the second Hubble slow-roll parameter measures the fractional change of the first parameter. Since ,
For a canonical inflaton, . Expanding cosmic inflation means , equivalently because . Small is not required for accelerated expansion itself, but helps maintain the slow-roll approximation over many e-folds. Its logarithmic definition assumes ; in exact de Sitter expansion it is undefined unless interpreted as a limit.
For conventional slow-roll inflation, assume , , a smooth positive scalar potential, and slowly varying small parameters. The Friedmann equation and inflaton equation of motion then reduce to
Substitute these in the exact expression for :
To obtain the potential and Hubble slow-roll parameter relation, differentiate along the slow-roll trajectory :
Hence
The second quantity on the right is the second potential slow-roll parameter, not the logarithmic Hubble-flow itself. Consistency usually requires and ; identities involving division by are used on rolling intervals and interpreted by limiting values at stationary points.
This is the potential of Starobinsky inflation. Put and , so . Its potential slow-roll parameter and second potential slow-roll parameter are
At large positive , , so both and are small and slow-roll inflation is possible. Near the minimum, a Taylor expansion gives and hence
They are large for , so that region cannot sustain slow roll.
At horizon exit during single-field slow-roll inflation, . Applying this operator to the potential slow-roll parameter and the second potential slow-roll parameter yields the displayed leading-order flow equations. Corrections to the horizon-exit derivative contribute only at higher slow-roll order here.