For small categories , a functor and , choose an infinite cardinal number bounding the number of morphisms of and the total number of elements of . Given a natural transformation , generate a subfunctor from all by applying every outgoing -morphism. Each has at most elements. Label bounded values by subsets of ; only a set of such functors and transformations exists. These factorizations give the solution-set condition for precomposition, whose left adjoint is the left Kan extension.
Every functor on a small category is the colimit of the covariant representable functors indexed by the opposite of its category of elements. The cocone indexed by sends to . By the Yoneda lemma, a compatible cocone into is exactly a natural transformation . The opposite indexing direction is essential because precomposition reverses the representing-object arrow.
For a categorical presheaf on a small category, its category of elements has objects with and arrows satisfying . The canonical natural transformation sends to . These maps exhibit as the displayed colimit. At , a representative maps to , with inverse . The arrow identifies every representative with its canonical inverse image, proving the bijection and the colimit universal property.
Category of small categories Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-10-14
Objects are small categories and morphisms are functors. Its products pair objects and arrows componentwise. Its exponential objects are functor categories, as shown by the currying adjunction for small categories.
Cauchy-complete category Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-07
A category is Cauchy-complete when every idempotent morphism splits: for with , there are and with and . Its Karoubi envelope freely supplies these splittings. For a small category, this condition makes every retract of a representable functor representable.
Two objects of a category lie in the same connected component if a finite zigzag of morphisms, with either orientation allowed, joins them. This is an equivalence relation; its classes give full subcategories, each a connected category. For a small category, the collection of components is a set denoted . A functor induces a function on components. Empty categories have no components.
For a regular category that is a small category, a regular functor to the Category of sets that reflects isomorphisms exists exactly when the category has almost total support for a regular category. Necessity follows because a nonempty image forces the object's support to be terminal, while an empty image makes all projections invertible and makes all equalizers of maps out of invertible. This proves that is strict initial. For sufficiency, use the capitalization theorem to map conservatively and regularly into a capital regular category, then take global sections of a capital regular category. Well-supported objects retain points; proper strict initial objects retain empty point sets. A bijection between nonempty point sets makes the image subobject entire and makes the kernel-pair diagonal entire, by well-pointedness. Thus the image arrow is both a regular epimorphism and a monomorphism, and is invertible. The capitalization theorem is a substantive existence input; this argument does not infer arbitrary large-category representability from small-category hypotheses.
For a set-valued covariant functor on a small category, the Yoneda lemma sends the element to the transformation . These transformations form a cocone indexed by the opposite category of elements. At , send the representative to . It is surjective using ; two representatives of are identified through that same object of the category of elements. This proves the displayed presentation pointwise.
Coverage on a category 2026-10-14
A coverage specifies covering families on a small category, stable under refinement along arrows: for a covering family into and , there is a covering family into whose composites with factor through the original family. Passing to generated sieves and imposing maximality and local transitivity gives its associated Grothendieck topology, with the same sheaves on a site. One can equivalently specify the saturated covering sieves directly. Rigidity refers to these covering sieves, so it is unchanged by replacing a family presentation by its generated topology.
For categorical presheaves on a small category, restrictions in the displayed exponential object act by precomposition with . Evaluation sends at to . The currying of sends to the natural transformation whose value on is . Evaluation and currying are inverse and natural, proving the Cartesian closed category structure.
For a small category, this formula defines the exponential object in its covariant set-valued functor category. An arrow acts by precomposition with . Evaluation applies a natural transformation to ; currying a map sends to the transformation . The formulas prove the universal property directly, without an adjoint existence theorem.
A functor is finite-limit-preserving if it carries each finite limit cone to a limiting cone. When is a small category with finite limits, this is equivalent to being a filtered colimit in a category of covariant representable functors, and to the opposite of its category of elements being a filtered category. It is also equivalent to every comma category having finite limits, for all sets .
Free cocompletion 2026-10-14
For a small category , its presheaf category is the free enlargement under small colimits. Each categorical presheaf is the colimit of the diagram sending to the representable presheaf . The map at sends to . It is surjective at each because is the image of at . If two representatives have the same image , they are both identified with the representative at by arrows in the category of elements, proving injectivity. Thus . For a cocomplete target, a functor on extends by these colimits, uniquely up to natural isomorphism among colimit-preserving extensions.
Irreducible projective in a set-valued functor category Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-14
For a small category , an object of is an irreducible projective when preserves coproduct in a category objects and epimorphisms. Preservation of coproducts means every map from into a coproduct factors uniquely through one summand. Such objects are precisely retracts of representable functors; when the indexing category is a Cauchy-complete category, they are representable. To see the retract, split the canonical epimorphism from a coproduct of representables using projectivity, and use coproduct preservation to factor the splitting through one summand.
For small categories and a set-valued functor , each displayed colimit exists in the Category of sets. A representative maps under a natural transformation to . The colimit identifications make this well-defined, proving the adjunction between left Kan extension and precomposition.
For , let be its category of elements. Its objects are with ; an arrow is a morphism satisfying . This is a small category, because is small and all values of are sets.
Send to the representable presheaf , and send an arrow to postcomposition . There is a cocone to whose map at is
The functor laws give its naturality and the required cocone compatibility.
Compute the colimit pointwise as a disjoint union modulo its diagram identifications. At a representative is a triple , and it maps to . Every is the image of . Moreover is an arrow in , so its diagram relation identifies
Thus every representative is identified with the canonical representative of its image. Two representatives have equal images exactly when their canonical representatives agree. This proves a componentwise bijection; restriction maps respect it. The resulting natural isomorphism is the canonical colimit presentation of a presheaf:
Working with a small category (or in a fixed ambient universe), for a categorical presheaf and fixed , apply the categorical coend construction to . It is the quotient of the disjoint union of pairs by the relations
Define . It respects every relation because . Define . Then . Conversely the relation with gives , so is the identity morphism. Therefore
For , restriction on the categorical coend sends to , and . A natural transformation likewise acts on the second coordinate and commutes with . Thus the density formula for presheaves is a natural isomorphism, not just a family of unrelated bijections.
For a locally small category , an object , and a functor , the covariant form of the Yoneda lemma is the natural bijection
For define , where . For , functoriality gives , so this is a natural transformation. Conversely, naturality of at gives . The two constructions are inverse. They are natural in , because a natural transformation commutes with evaluation. They are also natural in : an arrow induces by precomposition, and the resulting map corresponds to . Applying the result to the opposite category gives for .
Now let be a small category, and let . Finite products in a category in exist pointwise; the terminal functor is the constant singleton functor. Define the exponential of covariant set-valued functors by
Smallness ensures that these natural transformations form a set. For , define at by
Precomposition respects identities and composition, so this defines a functor. Its evaluation map of an exponential object is
To check naturality, for both sides give : one side uses naturality of , and the other uses the defining action of .
Here is the full universal property. Given , define by
For , naturality of makes this commute with , so is a natural transformation. Replacing by is the same as precomposing by , proving naturality in . Conversely, gives . Starting with recovers it immediately. Starting with , its naturality at yields
so it too is recovered. The formulas are natural in and , giving the required adjunction . Therefore the covariant functor category is cartesian closed. This proof supplies the actual exponential and does not need a colimit presentation of its arguments.
Finally suppose itself is a small category which is a Cartesian closed category. In its presheaf category, the same construction, applied to , gives
The first isomorphism uses the product's universal property: a map into is precisely a pair of maps into and . The next is the Yoneda lemma, and the last is the exponential adjunction in . Each step is natural in , , and . Under these identifications, evaluation corresponds to of the evaluation . Hence the Yoneda embedding preserves exponentials, with the natural identification .