Over , the polynomial factors as . Since is not a square modulo , the last factor is an irreducible polynomial. The splitting field is , so . The finite-field Frobenius automorphism fixes and swaps the other two roots.
The polynomial has values at respectively, modulo . Thus has no root and is an irreducible polynomial over . One root generates ; all its Frobenius conjugates are there, so this is its splitting field. Hence , generated by , a 3-cycle on the roots.
A cyclotomic field over is a field generated by an th root of unity of exact order . It contains all roots of , and is its splitting field. In characteristic zero this polynomial is separable, so the extension is Galois.
Every automorphism sends to with , and is determined by that image. Composition multiplies the exponents modulo , yielding an injective homomorphism into an abelian group. Thus the Galois group is abelian. Using irreducibility of the cyclotomic polynomial, every unit exponent occurs and
If “cyclotomic” is used more broadly for a subfield of such a field, it is still Galois and abelian, because every subgroup of an abelian Galois group is normal.
The splitting field of is the smallest extension in which is a product of linear factors; equivalently, is generated over by all its roots of a polynomial. To prove existence and uniqueness of splitting fields, adjoin a root of an irreducible polynomial dividing and repeat until splits. If and are two resulting fields, an embedding between the fields generated so far extends by sending each newly adjoined root to a root of its transformed minimal polynomial. Repetition gives a -embedding , whose image contains every root of and is therefore all of . Thus the splitting field exists and is unique up to -isomorphism.
Now write , and let the distinct irreducible factors of have degrees . The irreducible factors of a finite-field Frobenius polynomial show that a root of the degree- factor lies in exactly when . Hence the splitting field over a finite field is
Every finite field is a perfect field, so is separable; it is normal because it is a splitting field. It is consequently a Galois extension. More explicitly, the Galois group of a finite field extension is the cyclic group of order generated by the finite-field Frobenius automorphism .
Finally, let denote the number of monic irreducible polynomials over a finite field of degree over . Since
and , , , we obtain
Because has characteristic , the prime field lies in , and
for every . These are all roots. Moreover , so is a separable polynomial.
Let be the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element of over . Translation by sends an irreducible factor of to the irreducible factor . The additive group of therefore acts on the irreducible factors, and every orbit has size or . An orbit of size would already contribute to the degree- polynomial , forcing . Then , all roots lie in , and , contrary to the hypothesis.
Thus for every . If , comparison of the coefficient of in for gives times the nonzero leading coefficient, a contradiction. Hence , and since is a monic divisor of the monic degree- polynomial , we have . Thus is irreducible over .
All roots already belong to , so the splitting field is
As the splitting field of a separable polynomial, is a Galois extension. For each , irreducibility gives a distinct -automorphism
These exhaust the automorphisms. This is an Artin–Schreier extension, and
Proceed by induction on . A nonconstant polynomial over a field has an irreducible factor . Part (a) gives an extension containing a root of , hence of . The factor theorem gives
where is monic of degree . Apply the induction hypothesis over and compose the resulting field extensions. The final field contains roots and
Equivalently, every polynomial has a splitting field.
Let be a splitting field of over . Its formal derivative is
The assumption on the characteristic of says that in . Any root of is nonzero, and hence . Thus and have no common root, so is a separable polynomial. Since it has degree and splits over , it has exactly distinct roots. This is the separability of roots of unity.
Fix a primitive root of unity . Define the th cyclotomic polynomial by
It is monic and has degree given by the Euler totient function . Partitioning all th roots of unity according to their exact multiplicative order gives the cyclotomic factorization
We now prove by mathematical induction that . The base case is . If the result holds for every proper divisor of , then
is monic and belongs to . Polynomial division of by the monic integer polynomial produces a quotient and remainder in . The factorization over says that the remainder is zero and the quotient is , proving the claim.
It remains to prove irreducibility of cyclotomic polynomials. Let be a monic irreducible polynomial dividing , let be a root of , and write . We claim that is a root of for every prime number . Otherwise is a root of , so is a root of . Since is the minimal polynomial of over , Gauss lemma for polynomials gives
After reduction of an integer polynomial modulo a prime, the Frobenius endomorphism gives
Choose an irreducible factor of the nonconstant monic polynomial . Then , so . The cyclotomic factorization would then make divide over . This is impossible because its derivative is coprime to it when .
Thus for every prime . Iterating this fact over a prime factorization shows that whenever . These are all primitive th roots, so
Because divides , equality holds and . Hence every cyclotomic polynomial is irreducible over .
Finally, direct multiplication gives
Also
Applying the cyclotomic factorization to the two factors on the right gives
and therefore
Since , cancellation yields
The thirtieth cyclotomic polynomial is irreducible over by the theorem just proved, so is irreducible.
Write , where . For
the derivative is
so is a separable polynomial and all its roots in its splitting field are distinct.
Let be the set of these roots. The Frobenius endomorphism and the identities
show that is closed under addition and multiplication. It is also closed under additive inverses and, for , inversion. Thus is a finite field. Since splits into distinct linear factors, . The field generated by all roots is therefore itself, so and
Hence the polynomial characterization of a finite field gives
Now let be irreducible of degree , and let be a root in an algebraic closure. The minimal polynomial of an algebraic element gives
so has elements. Its nonzero elements form a finite group under multiplication, of order ; hence . Therefore is a root of , and its minimal polynomial divides every polynomial over that vanishes at . Thus the irreducible factors of a finite-field Frobenius polynomial satisfy
A splitting field of is an extension in which
for roots , and which is generated by those roots:
The generation condition is the required minimality: no proper intermediate field containing can still contain every root.
Every fixes and permutes the roots of , so it preserves their splitting field . Restriction therefore defines a homomorphism
If is the identity, then fixes both and , which generate ; hence is the identity. Thus is injective, and its image is a subgroup:
A field extension is a splitting field for when splits into linear factors over and is generated over by the roots of . Equivalently, it is the smallest extension inside an algebraic closure over which splits.
To prove existence, choose an irreducible factor of , adjoin one of its roots, and factor over the resulting finite extension. If a nonlinear factor remains, adjoin one of its roots and repeat. Each step lowers the total degree of the unsplit factors, so after finitely many finite extensions the polynomial splits. The field generated by the roots obtained is therefore a splitting field.
The precise uniqueness theorem says that if and are splitting fields of the same polynomial over , then there is a field embedding isomorphism
whose restriction to is the identity. More generally, an isomorphism of base fields carrying one polynomial to another extends to an isomorphism of their splitting fields. Thus splitting fields are unique up to base-field isomorphism; inside a fixed algebraic closure, the field generated by all the roots is literally unique. These facts are summarized by existence and uniqueness of splitting fields.
Let
The roots of are , so
is the splitting field of x cubed minus two. As a subfield of it is unique, because any splitting field in must contain all three roots and hence must contain both and
minimality then forces it to equal .
If the minimal polynomial of has degree , then
has elements and is an intermediate field of
. The tower law for field extensions gives
so .
The multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic. Choose a generator
of , of order . If lay in a proper intermediate field of degree , its order would divide , a contradiction. Thus
and its minimal polynomial has degree .
For arbitrary , let be the splitting field of
over . Its roots form a field: the Frobenius endomorphism shows they are closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication, and inversion. The derivative is , so there are exactly distinct roots. Thus this root field has order . Applying the preceding generator argument supplies an element whose minimal polynomial over has degree , proving that an irreducible polynomial of every positive degree exists.
An element is separable over when its minimal polynomial has distinct roots in a splitting field. A polynomial has a repeated root exactly when it has a common root with its formal derivative. Hence
implies that has no repeated root and is separable.
Let be the minimal polynomial of . Repeatedly factor through the Frobenius until
where . Irreducibility of makes irreducible, and
has separable minimal polynomial . Put
Then is separable and
Every is a polynomial in of degree below . The freshman's-dream identity gives
so is purely inseparable.
Finally, any intermediate field satisfying the stated conditions consists of elements separable over , so it lies in the maximal separable subextension just constructed. Conversely, the condition that all relevant th powers lie in that field puts , and hence , inside it. The two inclusions prove uniqueness.
Take
and let . Take
the affine group over a finite field, and let be its translation subgroup. Both normal subgroups have order , and
The groups are not isomorphic: is abelian, while is nonabelian.
For , let
Then . The fixed field of its subgroup of order three is its unique quadratic subfield,
Let
the splitting field of . Its Galois group is . The normal subgroup fixes the quadratic discriminant field, so
Now let . Part (a), with , supplies a cyclic Galois extension with group . For , take the splitting field
of . The prime is unramified in , so at every prime ideal above its valuation is one. It cannot therefore be a th power in the cyclotomic field. Hence
The automorphisms
and, for ,
satisfy
They generate all automorphisms, proving
This is the affine Galois group of the splitting field of x to the p minus two.
A finite extension is normal when every irreducible polynomial in having one root in splits completely over .
Suppose first that is normal. Choose with , and let be the minimal polynomial of over . Every splits in by normality, and is generated by their roots because it is already generated by the particular roots . Thus is the splitting field of .
Conversely, suppose that is the splitting field of . Every -embedding permutes the roots of , so . By the embedding characterization of normality, is normal. This proves the finite normal extension as a splitting field criterion.
False. Let
where is a primitive cube root of unity. Then is the splitting field of over , so is normal. The irreducible polynomial has a root in but does not split there, so is not normal.
Put . The roots of are , so its splitting field is
The polynomial is irreducible over by the Eisenstein criterion at , and does not contain . The tower law for field extensions therefore gives .
Define automorphisms
They satisfy and . The eight maps and are distinct, so they exhaust the Galois group. Hence
the dihedral group of order eight.
The Galois correspondence gives all intermediate fields. The full list, with a single generator for each field, is
For example, has stabilizer , and has stabilizer ; the other entries follow similarly. Also has trivial stabilizer, so its orbit has eight elements and the primitive element theorem conclusion holds explicitly.
Finally, the normal subextension criterion says that normal intermediate fields correspond exactly to normal subgroups. In these are , , the two index-two Klein four-groups, , and , which gives exactly the “yes” rows above. This is the subfields of the splitting field of x to the fourth minus seven lattice.
An element is separable over when its minimal polynomial has distinct roots in a splitting field.
Because is irreducible, it is separable exactly when
If , then , so irreducibility makes this greatest common divisor equal to one. If , the zero-derivative criterion gives
for some , and is inseparable. Therefore
Let be the distinct roots of in its splitting field . For each , let be the unique th root of in an algebraic closure. Then
so the roots of
are precisely the . Hence
But , so . It follows that
which proves that is also the splitting field of over , as in the splitting field of a polynomial obtained by Frobenius substitution.
Moreover , so every root of is purely inseparable over . In fact is purely inseparable.
Now take . The extension theorem for field embeddings extends to a -embedding of into an algebraic closure. Since is a splitting field of over , its image is again , so this extension is an automorphism of . It is unique: for every root ,
and the Frobenius endomorphism gives only one possible th root. Since the generate over , is uniquely determined. This is the unique embedding extension through a purely inseparable extension.
If a monic polynomial has roots in a splitting field, its polynomial discriminant is
It is a symmetric polynomial in the roots, so it belongs to the base field; it is nonzero exactly when is a separable polynomial.
Put
the Vandermonde determinant. A root permutation sends to . Hence the Galois group of a polynomial is contained in the alternating group exactly when every Galois automorphism fixes , which by the fixed-field property is equivalent to . This implies that is a square in . Conversely, if for , then , so . The Galois group therefore fixes and consists of even permutations. This proves the discriminant criterion for an alternating Galois group.
Now let
The rational root theorem shows that none of is a root, so this cubic is irreducible over . The discriminant of a depressed cubic is
This is not a square in , so the Galois group of an irreducible cubic is over .
Over , the discriminant is the square
The cubic remains irreducible: a root in the degree-two extension would generate over both a degree-three field, by irreducibility, and a subfield of a degree-two field, contradicting the tower law for field extensions. Its Galois group over is consequently .