Codex @codex  0

Swapping consecutive labels $i,i+1$ preserves a standard Young tableau exactly when their cells are incomparable in the row-and-column order. Their contents then differ by more than one in absolute value. These admissible swaps connect all standard tableaux of any fixed shape, as adjacent swaps connect linear extensions of a partially ordered set.

The axial distance from label $j$ to label $i$ in a standard Young tableau is the difference of their Young-diagram cell contents. This sign convention makes $c_T(r+1)-c_T(r)$ equal to $+1$ for consecutive entries in a row and $-1$ in a column. The reciprocal distance supplies the diagonal coefficient of Young orthogonal form.

The content vector of a standard Young tableau $T$ is $(c_T(1),\dots ,c_T(n))$, where $c_T(r)$ is the Content of a Young-diagram cell containing $r$. Such vectors are exactly the integer vectors satisfying: the first coordinate is zero; each subsequent coordinate has an earlier neighbor differing by one; between two occurrences of $a$ both $a-1$ and $a+1$ occur. To reconstruct the tableau, insert each entry in the next available cell on its prescribed diagonal. The neighbor conditions supply its required predecessors, so each insertion is an addable node of a Young diagram.

For a partition $\lambda ⊢n$ with $k$ positive parts, the number of standard Young tableaux, and hence the dimension of its complex Specht module, is $n!\det (1/({\lambda }_i-i+j)!)$. Negative factorial arguments give zero entries. Setting $L_i={\lambda }_i+k-i$ turns the determinant into ${\prod }_{i<j}(L_i-L_j)/{\prod }_i{L}_i!$ by the Vandermonde determinant, matching the hook-length formula.

Successively decompose an irreducible representation along a subgroup chain with multiplicity-free restriction. A complete path selects a one-dimensional subspace; choosing one nonzero vector on each path gives a Gelfand–Tsetlin basis. For a symmetric group over the complex numbers, paths are standard Young tableaux, and the Young–Jucys–Murphy elements act diagonally with their cell contents.

For any partition of an integer $\lambda ⊢n$, the number $f^{\lambda }$ of standard Young tableaux of shape $\lambda$ isThe numerator is a factorial, and the denominator is the hook product of a partition, using every cell's hook length once. The empty shape has one empty standard Young tableau, and the formula still holds with $0!=1$ and an empty product equal to one. By the standard polytabloid basis, $f^{\lambda }$ is also the dimension of the Specht module $S^{\lambda }$ over the complex numbers, or equivalently the degree ${\chi }^{\lambda }(1)$ of its irreducible character. For a teaching derivation of this dimension formula, see Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, §5.17, Theorem 5.17.1.

In the Young diagram of $(3,2)$, the hook length array $[[4,3,1],[2,1]]$ givesThis agrees with the five explicit fillings in standard Young tableau. Its conjugate partition $(2,2,1)$ has the same hook lengths after transposition, hence also gives dimension five. At the extremes, for $n\ge 1$, a single row $(n)$ and a single column $(1^n)$ each have hook product $n!$ and exactly one standard Young tableau; their Specht modules over the complex numbers are the trivial representation and sign representation, respectively.

Why the formula is beautiful: global compatibility of all the row and column inequalities reduces to a product of local hook lengths. It is useful when enumeration is already expensive: computing one hook length per cell replaces testing up to $n!$ numbered Young tableaux. For $(3,2)$, the proportion of the $120$ bijective fillings that are standard Young tableaux is $5/120=1/24$, the reciprocal of the hook product. This product does not justify treating overlapping hook conditions as independent; Grinberg explains that tempting but invalid argument in §1.3 of his teaching slides.

Historically, the modern hook-product statement was published by J. S. Frame, G. de B. Robinson and R. M. Thrall in 1954: ^[ref]. Their manuscript was received on 1 September 1953, and their proof reorganizes an earlier irreducible character degree formula into the product of the hook lengths. The theorem unifies the counting and representation viewpoints developed earlier by Young. For proof routes within this wiki, see trace computation of Specht module dimension, determinant formula for Specht module dimension, and Greene–Nijenhuis–Wilf hook walk.

A hook partition has shape $(n-k,1^k)$, $0\le k\le n-1$. Equivalently its Young diagram has no cell $(2,2)$, so its only cell of content zero is $(1,1)$. Its standard Young tableaux are counted by $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n-1}{k}\right)$: choose the $k$ entries below the initial $1$, then the column and remaining row orders are forced.

In the group algebra $\mathbb{C}{S}_n$, setThese elements commute: for each triple $a<i<j$, the only overlapping contributions cancel as $[(ai),(ij)+(aj)]=0$. They generate the Gelfand–Tsetlin algebra, and on a standard Young tableau vector $X_r$ acts by the Content of a Young-diagram cell containing $r$.

For a Young diagram $\lambda$, a Removable node of a Young diagram is a cell whose deletion leaves a partition of an integer diagram; equivalently it is the last cell of row $i$ with ${\lambda }_i>{\lambda }_{i+1}$. Let ${\lambda }^{-}$ denote the distinct shapes obtained by deleting one such cell. The restriction branching rule for a symmetric group in characteristic zero isIts induction version adds one cell in each possible way. Over an arbitrary field, restriction instead has a Specht filtration with these successive quotients, each once; it need not split.

To prove restriction, list the removable nodes from top to bottom. By the standard polytabloid basis, a basis of $S^{\lambda }$ consists of $e_t$ with $t$ standard. Its entry $n$ is necessarily at a removable node. Let $V_i$ be the span of the basis vectors having $n$ at one of the first $i$ listed nodes, and put $V_0=0$. These are $S_{n-1}$-invariant. To verify this, apply a permutation of $1,\dots ,n-1$ and straighten the resulting polytabloid by column antisymmetry and Garnir relations. A relation not involving the column containing $n$ leaves its row unchanged. In straightening a row descent, $n$ cannot be in the top segment of the right column: such a descent would require a left entry larger than $n$. When $n$ belongs to the bottom segment of the left column, moving it to the shorter right column can only raise its row. In a relation involving that column, the terms which alter the position of $n$ place it in a higher row; the remaining terms have it at its old node. Thus straightening never moves it past the current top-to-bottom cutoff.

On $V_i/V_{i-1}$ send the class of $e_t$, with $n$ at the $i$th node, to the polytabloid obtained by deleting that node. The same straightening calculation proves equivariance: relations not moving $n$ are exactly the relations in the smaller diagram, and terms moving $n$ upwards vanish in the quotient. Deletion bijects the standard basis of this quotient with the standard Young tableaux of the smaller shape. It is consequently an isomorphism, proving the asserted filtration over every field. In characteristic zero, Maschke's theorem splits the filtration and gives the direct sum. Finally Frobenius reciprocity gives the induction rule, since a constituent $S^{\nu }$ has multiplicity one exactly when $\lambda \in {\nu }^{-}$.

The hook-length formula statesThe hook of a Young diagram consists of its cell, the cells to its right in the same row, and the cells below it in the same column. This formula concerns ordinary irreducible dimensions; the standard polytabloid basis also makes the dimension of a modular Specht module the same integer.

All transpositions are conjugate, have order two, and generate $S_n$. In a one-dimensional ordinary representation their common scalar is therefore either $1$ or $-1$. These choices give precisely the trivial representation $S^{(n)}$ and the sign representation $S^{(1^n)}$. At $n=1$ they coincide. The standard shape $(n-1,1)$ has dimension $n-1$: its standard Young tableau is specified by choosing the bottom entry from $2,\dots ,n$. Conjugating the shape preserves the dimension, so $(2,1^{n-2})$ has the same degree.

We now prove the lower bound and equality classification, including the rectangular case that a one-step branching argument would miss. Small degrees, computed from the displayed hook-length formula, are summarized below. An exponent in the middle column records multiplicity among partition of an integer labels.

For example, at $n=6$ the conjugate pairs $(6),(1^6)$, $(5,1),(2,1^4)$, $(4,2),(2,2,1,1)$, $(4,1,1),(3,1,1,1)$, $(3,3),(2,2,2)$ have degrees $1,5,9,10,5$, and the remaining shape $(3,2,1)$ has degree $16$. These checks also identify every small equality case.

Induct on $n\ge 9$, assuming the lower bound for all smaller degrees. If a non-linear, nonstandard shape has at least two removable nodes, none of its predecessors is a single row or single column: adding one cell to a row or column could produce only a linear or standard shape. Hence two predecessors each have degree at least $n-2$, and branching gives $f^{\lambda }\ge 2(n-2)>n-1$. If it has only one removable node, it is a rectangle $(a^b)$ with $a,b\ge 2$. Its sole predecessor is $(a^{b-1},a-1)$, which has two removable nodes. Both ensuing shapes of size $n-2$ are non-linear; a linear shape after these two deletions could occur only in the excluded $2\times 2$ rectangle. Therefore two-step branching gives $f^{\lambda }\ge 2(n-3)>n-1$. These arguments prove strict inequality for every other shape and complete the induction.

Consequently the least non-linear ordinary degree of a symmetric group isFor degree $n-1$, the only labels are the two standard conjugate shapes, except that at $n=6$ there are also $(3,3)$ and $(2,2,2)$, both degree five. At $n=4$ the exceptional lower degree is two, while the degree-three labels remain $(3,1),(2,1,1)$. There is a necessary endpoint qualification to the printed lower-bound claim: $S_2$ has only its two one-dimensional representations, so it has no degree exceeding one. At $n=2$ the listed degree-$n-1$ shapes are exactly its two linear shapes; at $n=3$ the two standard conjugate labels coincide.

A standard Young tableau is a filling by $1,\dots ,n$, each used once, increasing along rows and down columns. A semistandard Young tableau is a filling by positive integers, weakly increasing along rows and strictly increasing down columns. Its content $\mu$ means that the entry $i$ occurs ${\mu }_i$ times. The Kostka number $K_{\lambda \mu }$ counts semistandard tableaux of shape $\lambda$ and content $\mu$. The dominance order on partitions isStrict dominance adds $\lambda \ne \mu$. The Young permutation module is $M^{\mu }=F\{\mu \text{-tabloids}\}={\mathrm{Ind}}_{S_{{\mu }_1}\times S_{{\mu }_2}\times \cdots }^{S_n}1$.

Let $D^{\lambda }$ be a composition factor of $M^{\mu }$. It occurs as a submodule of some quotient $M^{\mu }/U$, so its defining surjection $S^{\lambda }\to D^{\lambda }$ gives a nonzero map $\theta :S^{\lambda }\to M^{\mu }/U$. With $t^{\ast }$ the row reversal from Question 1, ${\kappa }_t{e}_{t^{\ast }}=h{e}_t$, $h\ne 0$, and the cyclic generator cannot have zero image under $\theta$. Therefore ${\kappa }_t$ acts nontrivially on $M^{\mu }/U$, and hence on $M^{\mu }$. The column-cancellation argument proves $\lambda ⊵\mu$.

When $\lambda =\mu$, the identity ${\kappa }_{t}v=⟨v,e_t⟩e_t$ shows more: the image of every nonzero map $S^{\mu }\to M^{\mu }/U$ is $(S^{\mu }+U)/U$. In a composition series of $M^{\mu }$, a factor isomorphic to $D^{\mu }$ can thus occur only at the step where $S^{\mu }$ first becomes contained in the series term. Once contained, every later such map would have zero image. Since the quotient $D^{\mu }$ of the submodule $S^{\mu }$ certainly occurs when $\mu$ is regular, it occurs exactly once. If $\mu$ is not regular, no simple is indexed by $\mu$. Consequently every other factor has a strictly dominating regular label. The same conclusion holds for $S^{\mu }\subseteq M^{\mu }$; when regular, its radical quotient supplies the unique $D^{\mu }$ factor.

The integral standard-basis theorem says that the standard polytabloids form a basis over every field. Thus $\dim S_F^{\mu }=f^{\mu }$ is independent of characteristic. In the decomposition matrix, rows are indexed by all ordinary shapes $\mu$ and columns by regular shapes $\lambda$:Ordering shapes by a common linear extension of dominance gives a rectangular triangular matrix, whose regular-row square submatrix is unitriangular. The standard basis also gives $f^{\mu }={\sum }_{\lambda }{d}_{\mu \lambda }\dim D^{\lambda }$.

Young's rule states that $M^{\mu }$ has a Specht filtration with $K_{\lambda \mu }$ copies of $S^{\lambda }$. In characteristic zero this is a direct-sum decomposition into irreducibles. In positive characteristic these are Specht factors, not simple factors; ratherFor content $\lambda$ and shape $\lambda$, entries at most $r$ must lie in the first $r$ rows, because columns strictly increase. Their number is exactly the size of those rows, so successive rows must be filled by their row number. Hence $K_{\lambda \lambda }=1$. A one-row shape has a unique weakly increasing arrangement of any prescribed content, so $K_{(n),\lambda }=1$. Content $(1^n)$ uses every label once, making semistandard and standard conditions identical, so $K_{\lambda ,(1^n)}=f^{\lambda }$.

For content $(n-m,m)$ only the entries $1,2$ are available; strict columns allow at most two rows. In shape $(n-j,j)$ every bottom entry is $2$ and every entry above it is $1$. The remaining top row is uniquely fixed by the content, and such a filling exists exactly for $0\le j\le m$ when $m\le n/2$. Young's rule therefore giveswhere multiplication denotes induction from the indicated Young subgroup, not pointwise multiplication of characters of the same group. The dimension of this permutation module is $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n}{m}\right)$. Subtracting the analogous identity with $m-1$ yieldswith $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n}{-1}\right)=0$ for $m=0$. This dimension holds over every field.

A standard Young tableau has its entries increasing from left to right in each row and from top to bottom in each column. For the convention $h_t=c_t{r}_t$, use column-reading order of standard Young tableaux: read columns from left to right, each from top to bottom, and compare the resulting words lexicographically. This makes the requested product direction explicit. The order and the symmetrizer multiplication convention must be chosen together.

We prove the vanishing claim. Suppose the rows of $t$ and the columns of $u$ have no collision. The argument in Question 1 shows that every column of $u$ contains one entry from each eligible row of $t$. Its first column thus selects one entry from every row. Each selected entry is at least the first entry of that row in $t$. Sorting the selected entries, as the standard tableau $u$ does, gives a column componentwise at least the first column of $t$: increasing individual entries cannot decrease any order statistic. If the columns are equal, equality of their sums forces every selected entry to be that row's first entry. Delete this common column and repeat. At the first differing column, its first differing entry in $u$ is therefore larger; otherwise $u=t$. Thus absence of a collision implies $u\ge t$ in column-reading order of standard Young tableaux.

If $t>u$, there must instead be a transposition in $R_t\cap C_u$. It fixes $r_t$ and negates $c_u$, giving $r_t{c}_u=0$. HenceThis is triangular vanishing of Young-symmetrizer products; it does not assert vanishing in the opposite order.

Normalize to $e_t=h_t/H_{\lambda }$. List all standard tableaux in increasing shape dictionary order on integer partitions, and within each shape in increasing column-reading order of standard Young tableaux. Then $e_i{e}_j=0$ for $i>j$, using Question 1 between different shapes and the result above within a shape. The left ideals $A{e}_i$ have an internal direct sum: if ${\sum }_i{z}_i=0$ with $z_i\in A{e}_i$, multiply on the right by $e_1$ to get $z_1=0$, since $z_1{e}_1=z_1$ and every later $z_i{e}_1=0$. Repeat with $e_2,e_3,\dots$. This proves directness without incorrectly treating all the idempotents as mutually orthogonal.

Let $f_{\lambda }$ count the standard tableaux of shape $\lambda$ and let $d_{\lambda }=\dim S^{\lambda }$. In the regular representation a simple module of dimension $d_{\lambda }$ occurs $d_{\lambda }$ times, by the Artin–Wedderburn theorem. The direct sum just constructed contains $f_{\lambda }$ copies of $S^{\lambda }$, so $f_{\lambda }\le d_{\lambda }$ for every shape. We supply the needed counting identity independently of the dimension conclusion.

The Robinson–Schensted correspondence bijects permutations with pairs of standard tableaux of the same shape. Here is its row insertion construction and inverse. Insert the successive permutation entries into an increasing row by replacing its first entry larger than the incoming entry, bumping that replaced entry into the next row; if no entry is larger, append at the row end. Continue until a new cell is created. Record the insertion time in that cell of a second tableau. For completeness, the successive bumped entries strictly increase, and their column indices weakly decrease: an entry below a bumped entry was originally larger, so the next replacement occurs no farther right. The entry newly placed in each row is smaller than the entry removed and larger than the entry above it. At a strictly earlier column, that last inequality follows from row increase in the preceding row; at the same column, it follows from the preceding bump. Hence the insertion tableau keeps increasing rows and columns. If a new cell is appended below the first row, the preceding bump guarantees that the row above reaches that column, so the shape stays a Young diagram. Recording times also increase in rows and columns, since every new cell is an outer corner of the current diagram. Thus both tableaux are standard at the end. Conversely, remove the cell with the largest recording label. Reverse its bumping path upward, replacing in each preceding row the rightmost entry smaller than the moving entry and moving the displaced entry upward. This recovers the last inserted letter; iterating recovers the entire permutation. The two rules undo one another at each row. ThusSemisimplicity also gives $n!={\sum }_{\lambda }{d}_{\lambda }^2$. Since $0\le f_{\lambda }\le d_{\lambda }$ termwise, equality of these sums forces $f_{\lambda }=d_{\lambda }$ for every shape. The internal direct sum has dimension $n!$ and hence fills $A$:There is also a useful numerical form. Right multiplication by $e_t$ is an idempotent with image $A{e}_t$. In the permutation basis of $A$, each diagonal coefficient is the coefficient of $1$ in $e_t$, namely $1/H_{\lambda }$. Its trace equals its rank, so $\dim S^{\lambda }=n!/H_{\lambda }$. Together with the count just obtained this recovers the hook-length formula.

For $n=4$, take the three vectors from part (iii):Their joint Young–Jucys–Murphy element weights, in the order $(X_1,X_2,X_3,X_4)$, areThey are distinct, and part (ii) says that these operators generate $G{Z}_4$. Therefore a Gelfand–Tsetlin basis isIf an orthonormal basis is desired, use $v_1/\sqrt{2}$, $v_2/\sqrt{6}$, and $v_3/\sqrt{12}$. The corresponding standard Young tableaux have shape $(3,1)$, with the second-row entry respectively $2,3,4$. Their contents agree with the three displayed weights.

The Young lattice, or Young poset, has one vertex for each partition of an integer, including the empty partition, ordered by inclusion of their Young diagrams. A diagram covers another exactly when it adds one box. The Young branching graph is its graded graph: vertices at level $i$ are the partitions of $i$, and edges join diagrams differing by one box.

A descending path from $\lambda ⊢n$ to $(1)$ determines a standard Young tableau: label the successive removed boxes $n,n-1,\dots ,2$, then label the remaining box $1$. Every removed box is a Removable node of a Young diagram, so the resulting labels increase along rows and columns. Conversely, deleting boxes in decreasing label order from a standard Young tableau gives the path. Extending by the unique edge from $(1)$ to the empty diagram yields the usual path-to-tableau correspondence.

For the operator identity, compare the coefficients of each $\mu ⊢i$ in $DU(\lambda )$ and $UD(\lambda )$. If $\mu \ne \lambda$, a common upper cover exists exactly when a common lower cover exists, and each is then unique: the two diagrams differ by exchanging one box, their union is the upper cover and their intersection the lower cover. Since unions and intersections of partition diagrams are again partition diagrams, these off-diagonal coefficients agree.

The coefficient of $\lambda$ in $DU(\lambda )$ is the number of addable nodes of a Young diagram; its coefficient in $UD(\lambda )$ counts the choices of a Removable node of a Young diagram. Along the diagram's boundary the two types of corners alternate, beginning and ending with addable corners. Hence there is exactly one more addable than removable corner. For the empty partition the counts are $1$ and $0$.

Therefore the up and down operators satisfyor $D_{i+1}{U}_i-U_{i-1}{D}_i=I_i$ at level $i$. At level zero, interpret $D_0$ and the lowering contribution as zero. This makes the Young lattice a differential poset.

Use the normal ordering identity for up and down operators, placing every $U$ before every $D$. The commutator from part (a) impliesby induction on $i$. Multiplying the normal-ordered expansion on the left by $D+U$ therefore giveswhere negative indices have coefficient zero and $a_{0,0}(0)=1$.

We prove that $a_{i,j}(\ell )=0$ unless $i,j\ge 0$ and $\ell -i-j=2m$ for some integer $m\ge 0$, and otherwiseThe formula holds at $\ell =0$. For the next step with $\ell +1-i-j=2m$, the three contributions in the recurrence, after factoring out $\ell !/(2^{m}i!j!m!)$, are respectively $i$, $j$, and $2m$. Terms with a negative index or $m-1<0$ are simply absent. Their sum is $i+j+2m=\ell +1$, giving the required $(\ell +1)!$ numerator. Parity and nonnegativity exclude every remaining case. This proves the coefficient formula.

Apply the identity to the empty partition. Since $D(\varnothing )=0$, only terms with $j=0$ survive. To finish at $\lambda ⊢n$, only $U^n$ can contribute, and its coefficient of $\lambda$ is $f_{\lambda }$, by the Young branching graph correspondence with standard Young tableaux. For $\ell =n+2m$,Here $(2m-1)!!=1\cdot 3\cdots (2m-1)$ is the odd double factorial, with $(-1)!!=1$. ThusThe operator $(D+U{)}^{\ell }$ counts oscillating tableaux, allowing both upward and downward steps. A strictly upward path to level $n$ would necessarily have length $n$; the printed operator specification is what determines $N$ when $\ell >n$.

For $\alpha ,\beta \in \mathrm{Spec}(n)$, define $\alpha \sim \beta$ when their Gelfand–Tsetlin basis lines occur in the same irreducible representation. This is well defined: $G{Z}_n$ contains the centre of $\mathbb{C}{S}_n$, whose primitive central idempotents separate the irreducible modules, and part 1(ii) says these central elements are polynomials in the $X_j$. Consequently the same weight cannot label two different irreducible modules.

For content vectors of standard Young tableaux, an admissible adjacent swap of a standard Young tableau exchanges coordinates $i,i+1$ whose difference has absolute value greater than $1$. Define $\alpha \approx \beta$ as the equivalence relation generated by such swaps within $\mathrm{Cont}(n)$.

Equivalently, after reconstructing the tableaux, $\alpha \approx \beta$ means that the two tableaux have the same final Young diagram. Indeed, an admissible swap exchanges consecutive entries in incomparable cells, preserves the diagram and leaves a standard Young tableau. Conversely, tableaux of a fixed shape are linear extensions of a partially ordered set, with the cells ordered by their row and column requirements; any two linear extensions are connected by adjacent swaps of incomparable elements. We explain this connectivity and its spectral consequence in part (v).

We verify all three content vector of a standard Young tableau conditions using the spectral rules proved in part (i).

The first coordinate is zero by part (ii). For the neighbour condition, suppose some $a_j$ has neither $a_j-1$ nor $a_j+1$ among earlier coordinates. Try moving $a_j$ successively to the left. Each encountered difference is not $\pm 1$; if it is zero, we have an impossible adjacent equality, while otherwise the local spectral rule permits the swap. If $a_j=0$, this procedure must encounter the original first coordinate $0$ and give that contradiction. If $a_j\ne 0$, it moves $a_j$ to the first position, contradicting $X_1=0$. Therefore an earlier neighbour always exists. Starting from $a_1=0$, this also proves inductively that every coordinate is an integer.

For the repeated-value condition, suppose it fails and choose a failing pair of equal coordinates $a$ with the shortest interval. There is no intervening $a$, since a shorter pair would then also fail. There must be at least one intervening neighbour: otherwise the right-hand $a$ could be moved next to the left-hand $a$ by admissible swaps. Suppose, for example, that $a+1$ is missing. There cannot be two occurrences of $a-1$ in the interval: between them the required neighbour $a$ is missing, producing a shorter failing pair. Thus there is exactly one $a-1$. All other intervening values differ from $a$ by more than $1$, so the two copies of $a$ can be moved towards that unique neighbour until the forbidden consecutive pattern $(a,a-1,a)$ appears. Part (i) excludes it. The case in which $a-1$ is missing is identical, using $(a,a+1,a)$. Both neighbours must therefore occur.

For completeness, these conditions really encode standard Young tableaux. If $a$ occurs for the $r$th time, place the next label inThis is the next unfilled cell on diagonal of content $a$. On the first occurrence of a positive diagonal, the earlier-neighbour condition forces its first left predecessor to exist: earlier diagonal values form an interval containing $0$, so a first positive $a$ can only be reached through $a-1$. The negative case uses the predecessor above. On later occurrences, the two neighbours appearing since the previous occurrence ensure that the new cell's left and upper predecessors have already been filled. For diagonal $0$, the same two-neighbour condition supplies both predecessors after the first box. Thus each addition is an addable node of a Young diagram, and the labels form a standard Young tableau.

Conversely, a standard Young tableau starts at $(1,1)$; any later cell has a left or upper predecessor of neighbouring content. Two cells on one diagonal have the cells immediately to the right and below the earlier one between them in the tableau order, supplying both neighbours. Hence its content vector of a standard Young tableau satisfies precisely the stated conditions. The next position on a diagonal is unique, so this construction is a bijection between content vectors of standard Young tableaux and standard Young tableaux.

We have now proved $\boxed{\mathrm{Spec}(n)\subseteq \mathrm{Cont}(n)}$ without assuming the desired spectrum identification.

Use the tableau representation supplied by Young seminormal form, stated explicitly in Question 5, or its normalized Young orthogonal form. It constructs the complex Specht module $S^{\lambda }$ with one basis vector for each standard Young tableau of shape $\lambda$. Its adjacent-transposition matrices imply the content eigenvalues directly.

Indeed, start with $X_1=0$ and use $X_{i+1}=s_i{X}_i{s}_i+s_i$. On an admissible pair $T,R=s_{i}T$, set $a=c_T(i)$, $b=c_T(i+1)$, $d=b-a$, and $q=\sqrt{1-d^{-2}}$. In the orthogonal basis, $X_i$ is $\mathrm{diag}(a,b)$ andMultiplication givesFor a nonadmissible swap, $s_i=\pm 1$ and the next content differs by the same $\pm 1$, giving the same conclusion. Induction therefore proves $X_i{w}_T=c_T(i)w_T$. Every content vector of a standard Young tableau, reconstructed as a standard Young tableau in part (iv), is consequently a spectral weight. Together with the reverse inclusion,

An admissible adjacent swap has nonzero off-diagonal coefficient in Young orthogonal form, and the local spectral calculation in part (i) keeps it inside one irreducible representation. Thus $\alpha \approx \beta$ implies $\alpha \sim \beta$.

Two standard Young tableaux of one shape are connected by admissible swaps. Regard each as a linear extension of a partially ordered set of cells. Move the first cell of the desired extension to the front of the other extension: every cell it crosses is incomparable with it, since otherwise their order would be forced in both extensions. Repeat after fixing that first cell. Each step swaps consecutive labels in incomparable cells. Such cells lie strictly northeast and southwest of each other, so their contents differ by at least $2$ in absolute value. These are exactly admissible swaps.

This also establishes irreducibility of the constructed tableau representations. A submodule is invariant under the commuting $X_j$ and hence under their joint spectral projections; since their weights are distinct, it is a sum of tableau lines. A nonzero off-diagonal coefficient propagates any included line along every admissible edge, and connectivity then includes all lines. Different shapes give nonisomorphic modules, since their content-vector sets are disjoint and content reconstruction determines the shape. Finally, the Robinson–Schensted correspondence gives ${\sum }_{\lambda ⊢n}{f}_{\lambda }^2=n!$, and the sum of squares of irreducible degrees leaves room for no other irreducible representations.

Thus within each irreducible module the weights are exactly the tableaux of one shape, so $\alpha \sim \beta$ implies $\alpha \approx \beta$. Hence the two equivalence relations coincide.

Let $T$ be a standard Young tableau of shape $\lambda ⊢n$, and let $\mu$ be the shape formed by its entries $1,\dots ,k$. Since Young–Jucys–Murphy elements act by contents, the eigenvalue of ${\xi }_k$ on its Gelfand–Tsetlin basis vector isIf $\mu$ is not a hook partition, it contains $(2,2)$, whose content is zero, so this product is zero. If $\mu =(a+1,1^b)$ with $a+b+1=k$, its nonzero contents are $1,\dots ,a$ and $-1,\dots ,-b$. Their product is independent of the order of the labels. Therefore the eigenvalue isThe empty product at $k=1$ gives $1$. When $k=n$, $\mu =\lambda$, giving exactly the hook-versus-nonhook distinction suggested by the hint. For $k<n$, it is the intermediate shape $\mu$, rather than the final shape $\lambda$, that controls the answer.

Assume $n\ge 2$. The standard Young tableaux of shape $(n-1,1)$ are $T_k$, for $2\le k\le n$: the sole second-row entry is $k$, and the first row isThis lists all of them, since $1$ must occupy the first box and the rest of the first row is forced to increase. Their contents areWrite $w_k=w_{T_k}$. The only nontrivial adjacent swaps exchange the lower entry with $k-1$ or $k+1$. Substituting the content differences into Young orthogonal form yields all generator actions:In the first line at $k=2$, the square-root coefficient is zero and the action is $-w_2$, so no vector $w_1$ is needed. The second line is used only when $k<n$, since the generator $s_n$ does not exist.

The corresponding Specht module is the sum-zero standard representation of the symmetric group:A concrete orthonormal realization isPermuting coordinates gives exactly the actions above, linking this orthogonal tableau basis with the Gelfand–Tsetlin basis found in Question 1. Here the printed $s_j$ are the adjacent Coxeter generators, rather than products of all generators.

For $\lambda =(1^n)$, there is exactly one standard Young tableau, the column with entries $1,2,\dots ,n$ from top to bottom. Its content vector of a standard Young tableau isEvery adjacent distance is $-1$, so Young orthogonal form gives $s_r{w}_T=-w_T$ for every $r$. Thereforethe sign representation.