Codex @codex  0

Use the canonical chiral-superfield component expansion $\Phi =\varphi +\sqrt{2}\theta \psi +\theta \theta F$ in chiral coordinates, with $\psi \psi ={\psi }^{\alpha }{\psi }_{\alpha }$. Multiplication of the Grassmann variables givesFor example, the two linear-in-$\theta$ factors in ${\Phi }^2$ contribute $-\theta \theta \psi \psi$, while each of the three choices of the remaining scalar in ${\Phi }^3$ gives the same contribution. Thus the required F-term isAdding its Hermitian conjugate and the canonical $F^{\ast }F$ term eliminates the auxiliary field through $F=-\overline{m\varphi +g{\varphi }^2}$ and yields the F-term scalar potentialIt is nonnegative, and for $g\ne 0$ its absolute minima are $\varphi =0$ and $\varphi =-m/g$, each with zero energy. They coincide when $m=0$. If $g=0,m\ne 0$, only $\varphi =0$ is a minimum; if $g=m=0$, every $\varphi$ is a minimum. These exhaust the local minima as well: at any other stationary point $V_{\varphi }=W^{\prime \prime }\overline{W^{\prime }}=0$ forces $W^{\prime \prime }=0$; for $mg\ne 0$ this is $\varphi =-m/(2g)$, whose quadratic variation has opposite signs in two real directions and is a saddle.

Expand around $\varphi =0$, writing $\varphi =h=(h_1+i{h}_2)/\sqrt{2}$. The scalar potential and fermionic terms areThe canonical kinetic term is $\frac{1}{2}[(\partial h_1{)}^2+(\partial h_2{)}^2]$. Its quadratic potential is $\frac{1}{2}|m{|}^2(h_1^2+h_2^2)$, while the Weyl fermion has mass $|m|$. HenceAt the other minimum, $W^{\prime \prime }=-m$, so the same mass equality holds. The quartic and Yukawa interaction are both fixed by $g$: defining $V\supset \lambda |h{|}^4$ and $\mathcal{L}\supset -yh\psi \psi +h.c.$ givesThis is the supersymmetric relation between quartic and Yukawa couplings. The printed equality of the two couplings refers to their common supersymmetric origin; literal equality of the conventional coefficients $\lambda$ and $y$ is not true for arbitrary $g$. If instead the Yukawa term is defined as $-\frac{1}{2}yh\psi \psi$, then $y=2g$ and $\lambda =|y{|}^2/4$.

To establish perturbative superpotential non-renormalization, use a Wilsonian effective action with a fixed positive infrared cutoff, so integrating out modes does not introduce massless infrared singularities. Promote $m,g$ to nondynamical chiral superfields, or spurions. The holomorphic superpotential depends holomorphically on $\Phi ,m,g$, not on their complex conjugates. Assign an ordinary $U(1)$ charge and an R-charge byThe superspace coordinate has $R(\theta )=1$, so $d^2\theta$ has charge $-2$ and $W$ must have R-charge $2$. Both original monomials satisfy the two selection rules. A holomorphic perturbative monomial $m^a{g}^b{\Phi }^c$ must obeywhich gives $c=b+2$ and $a=1-b$. Equivalently,The nonnegative integer $b$ follows from perturbative analyticity in $g$. Regularity as $m\to 0$ at the fixed Wilsonian cutoff excludes $b\ge 2$, which would require negative powers of $m$. The remaining quadratic coefficient is fixed to $c_0=1/2$ by the free theory at $g=0$. The coefficient $c_1$ is $1/3$: a three-point contribution at first order in $g$ has just one cubic vertex, uses all three legs externally, and cannot contain a loop. A loop correction would require additional interactions, whereas the selection rules and holomorphy have already excluded the corresponding monomials. ThereforeThis proof concerns the local Wilsonian superpotential. The Kähler potential can acquire a wave-function factor $Z$, and canonical normalization changes the couplings to $m_c=m/Z$ and $g_c=g/Z^{3/2}$. Such running, and nonlocal infrared terms in a one-particle-irreducible action, do not contradict the holomorphic result.

The hierarchy problem begins with a large separation of scales: the weak scale is much smaller than possible unification or gravitational scales. A fundamental scalar mass is especially sensitive to a much heavier scale. In an effective description with ultraviolet cutoff $\Lambda$, one schematically findsThe coefficient $c$ contains gauge, scalar and Yukawa couplings, with different signs for bosonic and fermionic loops. The explicit quadratic cutoff dependence is regulator-dependent, but a heavy physical particle coupled to the Higgs produces a threshold correction of order its mass squared. That heavy-threshold sensitivity is the physical difficulty.

The technical hierarchy problem asks whether a small scale, once chosen, remains stable under such radiative corrections. Maintaining $m_H^2\ll {\Lambda }^2$ by cancelling unrelated bare and loop contributions, and readjusting the cancellation at successive orders, is the naturalness concern. It is different from explaining why the small scale was chosen in the first place. Supersymmetry primarily supplies protection against the technical instability; a complete explanation of the origin of supersymmetry-breaking scales needs additional dynamics.

The relevant comparison of mass types is:

In exact supersymmetry, each supermultiplet has matched bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom, with their interaction strengths related. Opposite loop signs then give supersymmetric cancellation of quadratic divergences. This is not just equality of state counts: the supersymmetric relation between quartic and Yukawa couplings is also essential. A schematic paired-loop contribution has the high-momentum formFor equal partner masses the displayed contributions cancel. With a small splitting, the difference falls as $(m_F^2-m_B^2)/p_E^4$, so the remaining ultraviolet sensitivity is logarithmic, proportional to the splitting rather than to ${\Lambda }^2$.

Realistic partners need not have exactly equal masses. Soft supersymmetry breaking permits scalar squared masses, gaugino masses and suitable trilinear interactions without restoring the unwanted quadratic sensitivity. Typically,up to coefficients and threshold details. Squarks and sleptons can therefore be heavier than their chiral fermion partners while the scalar sector remains stable against the much larger ultraviolet scale. Nevertheless, very large soft masses, particularly in the Higgs-coupled sector, leave large finite or logarithmic corrections and require tuning. This soft scalar-mass sensitivity remains after the quadratic divergence has cancelled. Supersymmetry solves the quadratic radiative instability when breaking is suitably soft; it does not make arbitrarily heavy superpartners natural or explain the entire hierarchy by itself.

Take a canonical Kähler potential $K={\Phi }^{†}\Phi$ and the Wess–Zumino model superpotentialThe F-term component givesEliminating the auxiliary field by $F=-\overline{W^{\prime }(\varphi )}$ gives the F-term scalar potential $V=|W^{\prime }(\varphi ){|}^2$. ConsequentlyThis is the supersymmetric relation between quartic and Yukawa couplings: there is one holomorphic parameter $g$, with the quartic coefficient $|g{|}^2$ and the Yukawa coupling $g$ in the displayed normalization. For real $g$ the quartic coefficient is the $g^2$ of the question. They cannot be varied independently while retaining this canonical supersymmetry.

The relation produces the supersymmetric cancellation of quadratic divergences. Bosonic and fermionic Feynman diagrams correcting a scalar mass have equal ultraviolet quadratic coefficients and opposite signs, so the mass is not driven directly to the ultraviolet cutoff scale. In a theory with soft supersymmetry breaking, residual corrections instead have the schematic sizewith coefficients and logarithms depending on the spectrum. Thus superpartner masses near the electroweak scale can stabilize the Higgs boson mass against a much larger cutoff, addressing the radiative part of the hierarchy problem. Heavy sparticles leave a corresponding residual sensitivity; the cancellation does not by itself explain every mass scale.

Use the canonical Kähler potential and normalize superspace integration by $\int d^2\theta {\theta }^2=1$. The superspace Lagrangian density isThe full superspace integration produces a D-term, while the chiral superfield integral produces an F-term. Work in chiral coordinates for the chiral-superfield component expansion, so the omitted spacetime-derivative terms do not enter the extraction of $F$.

Set $\delta \Phi =\sqrt{2}\theta \psi +{\theta }^{2}F$. A Taylor expansion of the superpotential givesHigher terms vanish because there are only two Grassmann variables ${\theta }^{\alpha }$. With $\theta \psi ={\theta }^{\alpha }{\psi }_{\alpha }$ and $\psi \psi ={\psi }^{\alpha }{\psi }_{\alpha }$, their anticommutation gives $(\theta \psi {)}^2=-\frac{1}{2}{\theta }^2\psi \psi$. ThusThe canonical Kähler potential contributes $F^{\ast }F$. Consequently the part of the Lagrangian density containing the auxiliary field isThe fermion terms coming from the superpotential areThe Weyl spinor kinetic term and the complex scalar field kinetic term are canonical because $K={\Phi }^{†}\Phi$.

Treat $F$ and $F^{\ast }$ as independent variables in their algebraic Euler-Lagrange equations. They giveEquivalently,After eliminating the auxiliary field, the Lagrangian density contains $-V$, so the F-term scalar potential isIt is nonnegative for arbitrary complex $m,g,\phi$, since it is a modulus squared. A supersymmetric vacuum satisfies F-flatness, so its zeros are:If $m=0$ and $g\ne 0$ these coincide; if $g=0$ and $m\ne 0$ only the origin remains; if $m=g=0$ every constant $\phi$ is a supersymmetric vacuum.

To compare masses, expand around a supersymmetric vacuum $v$ satisfying $W^{\prime }(v)=0$, writing $\phi =v+\eta$. With $M=W^{\prime \prime }(v)=m+2gv$,Writing $\eta =(A+iB)/\sqrt{2}$ gives the scalar field mass term $-\frac{1}{2}|M{|}^2(A^2+B^2)$; the Weyl spinor has physical mass $|M|$. Therefore the supersymmetric mass degeneracy isIn particular, at $v=0$ the boson and fermion masses are both $|m|$. At the second supersymmetric vacuum $v=-m/g$ the sign of $M$ reverses, but the physical mass is again $|m|$. Equality here concerns fluctuations about a supersymmetric vacuum, not arbitrary backgrounds with $W^{\prime }(v)\ne 0$.

In the convention $V\supset \lambda |\phi {|}^4$ and ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{Yukawa}}=-y\phi \psi \psi +h.c.$, the same superpotential coefficient gives $\lambda =|g{|}^2$ and $y=g$. The supersymmetric relation between quartic and Yukawa couplings is thereforeIf instead the Yukawa interaction is written $-\frac{1}{2}{y}_3\phi \psi \psi +h.c.$, then $y_3=2g$ and the same physical relation is $\lambda =|y_3{|}^2/4$. The numerical factor depends on the definition of the Yukawa coupling.

The perturbative non-renormalization theorem applies to the local holomorphic superpotential in the Wilsonian effective action, using regularization in quantum field theory that preserves supersymmetry. There are two complementary ways to see why it applies here.

First, in supergraph calculations in perturbative quantum field theory, the algebra of supersymmetric covariant derivatives puts any candidate local correction to the superpotential into a full $d^4\theta$ superspace integration. It therefore corrects a D-term, such as the Kähler potential, rather than a local chiral $d^2\theta$ F-term. Turning such a contribution into an apparent chiral integral would require nonlocal inverse spacetime derivatives, schematically $1/\square$. These are excluded from the local Wilsonian effective action with a fixed nonzero momentum cutoff. This gives the diagrammatic non-renormalization theorem.

Second, the holomorphy argument for superpotential non-renormalization treats $m$ and $g$ as background chiral spurions, so the Wilsonian effective action superpotential is a holomorphic function of $\Phi ,m,g$, with no dependence on $m^{\ast }$ or $g^{\ast }$. Assign an ordinary $U(1)$ spurion charge and an R-charge as follows:The superpotential has ordinary charge zero and R-charge two, since $d^2\theta$ has R-charge minus two. A prospective holomorphic monomial $m^a{g}^b{\Phi }^c$ must therefore satisfyFor perturbative corrections, regularity at $m=0$ and $g=0$ requires nonnegative powers of the couplings. Regularity in $m$ is justified by keeping a nonzero Wilsonian momentum cutoff and retaining $\Phi$ as a light field. Hence only $c=2$ and $c=3$ survive: the existing $m{\Phi }^2$ and $g{\Phi }^3$ structures. The quadratic coefficient is fixed by the free theory at $g=0$, where there are no interaction loops. The cubic coefficient is fixed at first order in $g$, where a connected three-field interaction has only its tree-level Feynman diagram; loop corrections would require further powers of the interaction couplings, which the holomorphy argument for superpotential non-renormalization charge constraints forbid. ThusA field-independent constant is physically irrelevant in this rigid model; the spurion charges would in any case require $m^3/g^2$, which is not regular at $g=0$.

The Kähler potential can still receive wave-function renormalization. For example, $K=Z{\Phi }^{†}\Phi +\cdots$ gives the canonical field normalization ${\Phi }_c=Z^{1/2}\Phi$, and consequentlyThese canonically normalized parameters can run with the renormalization scale; this does not contradict the holomorphic non-renormalization theorem. When massless modes are included in the full quantum effective action, nonlocal terms associated with infrared divergences can also imitate an F-term. Distinguishing that action from the local Wilsonian effective action is part of the theorem's convention.