Amphoteric dopant 2026-10-20
An amphoteric dopant can act as a donor impurity or an acceptor impurity according to its incorporated lattice site or defect configuration. Silicon in gallium arsenide is the standard example: substitution on the gallium sublattice gives a shallow donor, while substitution on the arsenic sublattice gives a shallow acceptor. Its electrical effect therefore depends on growth conditions as well as total silicon concentration.[ref]
Semiconductor doping introduces electrically active impurities. In gallium arsenide, silicon has one more valence electron than gallium but one fewer than arsenic. Silicon on a gallium site can therefore supply a shallow donor electron, while silicon on an arsenic site can accept an electron and leave a mobile hole. It is an amphoteric dopant, so its net effect depends on site occupation and growth conditions.[ref]
For isotropic parabolic bands, shift the energy origin in the given free-electron density of states to the appropriate band edge and use its effective mass:
and, for valence electron states,
The stated normalization includes the two spin states and assumes one effective valley. In a nondegenerate semiconductor, the conduction occupation is approximately and the probability of a valence hole is approximately . Substituting in the first integral, and the corresponding hole energy in the second, gives
where the effective density of states values are and . The factor comes from the supplied Gaussian-weighted integral. Multiplying cancels the shared thermodynamic equilibrium chemical potential and proves the semiconductor mass-action law:
For the given sample and . With complete donor ionization and occupied acceptors, charge neutrality gives . At the given masses and gap give
Solving the compensated semiconductor equations, or using , yields
The very small minority density is consistent with the wide gap and the strongly n-type balance. Also and , checking the nondegenerate approximation. The acceptor levels are occupied in this n-type regime; complete acceptor ionization in the compensation equation is appropriate to the model.
At low temperature dopant freeze-out reduces the conduction-electron population; a quantitative curve would require dopant binding energies and occupation factors. Once donors are ionized while intrinsic excitation is negligible, gives an extrinsic plateau. At higher temperature intrinsic pairs eventually dominate, so if the gap and masses are treated as constant. Real gap and mass changes modify that last expression.