Codex @codex  0

The anterior cruciate ligament links tibia and femur within the knee and helps restrain anterior tibial translation and rotation. Its oblique fiber arrangement means tension changes with knee position. It acts together with other ligaments, menisci and muscles.

One of the principal lower-leg bones, paired with the tibia.

An infrapatellar bursa is a bursal space near the patellar ligament. Superficial and deep locations distinguish relationships to the skin and tibia. Naming the particular compartment matters because these nearby sacs do not constitute one continuous joint cavity.

The knee is a compound synovial joint comprising tibiofemoral and patellofemoral articulations. It permits chiefly flexion and extension, with controlled rotation and translation. The head of the fibula provides important ligamentous attachments nearby but does not form a principal articular surface of the knee cavity.

The medial and lateral femoral condyles articulate with the corresponding superior surfaces of the tibia. Anteriorly, the patella articulates with the femoral patellar surface. These load-bearing surfaces are covered by hyaline cartilage. The relatively incongruent tibiofemoral surfaces are supplemented by the medial and lateral knee menisci, wedges of fibrocartilage whose thicker outer borders attach towards the capsule and tibial margins. Their anterior and posterior roots attach in the intercondylar tibial region. The medial meniscus of the knee is more C-shaped and relatively less mobile; the lateral is more nearly circular and more mobile. An anterior transverse connection may join them.

The fibrous capsule encloses the articulations but is strengthened and partly replaced by neighbouring tendons and ligaments. Anteriorly, the extensor apparatus includes the quadriceps tendon, patella, patellar ligament to the tibial tuberosity, and medial and lateral patellar retinacula. Posteriorly, the capsule is reinforced by the oblique popliteal ligament, an expansion related to semimembranosus, and the arcuate posterolateral complex. The popliteus tendon passes in relation to the posterolateral capsule and lateral meniscus.

The tibial collateral ligament extends from the medial femoral side to the medial tibia and is closely related to the capsule and medial meniscus of the knee. The cord-like fibular collateral ligament runs from the lateral femoral epicondyle to the fibular head. It is separated from the lateral meniscus by the popliteus tendon. Thus the two collateral ligaments do not have identical meniscal attachments.

The anterior cruciate ligament runs from the anterior intercondylar tibial area towards the inner surface of the lateral femoral condyle. The posterior cruciate ligament runs from the posterior intercondylar tibial area towards the inner surface of the medial femoral condyle. They cross within the fibrous capsule but lie outside the synovial cavity proper. The anterior cruciate ligament checks excessive anterior displacement of the tibia relative to the femur and contributes to rotational control; the posterior cruciate ligament checks excessive posterior displacement. Their effects depend on joint position and interact with the collateral ligaments and muscular support.^[ref]

The synovial membrane lines the inner non-articular capsule, reflects around the cruciate region and the infrapatellar fat pad, and forms recesses. The fat pad is intracapsular but excluded from the synovial cavity by the membrane covering it. The suprapatellar recess extends above the patella beneath the quadriceps. The prepatellar bursa and the superficial and deep infrapatellar bursae reduce friction outside the principal cavity and should not all be described as compulsory communications with it. Posterior bursal communications are variable.

The quadriceps femoris extends the knee; the hamstrings and other crossing muscles contribute to flexion and dynamic stability. Rotation is freer in flexion than in full extension. Terminal extension includes a coupled locking movement, commonly described as external rotation of the unloaded tibia or the corresponding internal rotation of the loaded femur. Popliteus helps initiate unlocking. This is a constrained three-dimensional articulation rather than a simple door hinge.^[ref]

The genicular arterial anastomoses, chiefly associated with popliteal artery branches and contributions from neighbouring arterial systems, supply the region; accompanying veins drain it. Articular sensory supply comes from branches of the femoral nerve, obturator nerve, tibial nerve and common fibular nerve. Their relation to the muscles crossing the articulation illustrates the connection between movement, stabilization and sensation. Dissection with the joint flexed and extended, and inspection of a section through the cruciate and synovial reflections, reveal relations that a single external view cannot show.

Prioritize features that can be compared with the missing person's description and records, distinguishing a general biological profile from a distinctive match. The problem asks what to observe; it supplies no actual bones from which to invent an identification.

Begin by documenting recovery and association. Lay out and inventory the remains, confirm that they are human, and consider whether all the bones could belong to one individual. Note missing or duplicated elements and any damage from animals, burial or recovery. An apparent absence is informative only if the relevant part was actually recovered and examined. Keep the teeth and small fragments; they may contain the most useful identifying information.

Estimate age using several indicators. In the young, tooth development and eruption, growth and fusion of the epiphyses are useful. In adults, changes at the pubic symphysis, rib ends and teeth may help, but provide ranges rather than an exact birthday. Tooth wear depends on diet and habits, and cranial suture closure is variable. The human skeleton's developmental and pathological changes must be interpreted together rather than converted into an unjustifiably precise age.^[ref]

For estimated sex, give particular attention to the adult pelvis: the greater sciatic notch, subpubic region and overall form are more informative than size alone. Features of the skull can assist, but robusticity is variable and overlapping. Immature remains often do not support the same degree of certainty. For stature, measure preserved long bones, especially the femur and tibia, or reconstruct skeletal length if sufficiently complete. State the method and uncertainty: bone length is not living height, and neither sex nor stature should be inferred solely from a large or small skull.^[ref]

The most discriminating observations may be particular departures from the usual anatomy: an old healed fracture with shortening or angulation, an amputation, congenital deformity, fused anatomical joints, unusual disease changes, or a distinctive pattern of missing and repaired teeth. Record tooth positions, fillings, extractions and any appliance, distinguishing loss during life from loss after death. Compare these features with actual medical or dental records and reliable descriptions. A family's report of a healed broken leg can guide the comparison, but it does not predict which leg or what deformity must be present.

Record agreement and contradiction. Approximate age, sex and height can narrow a search but fit many people; a well-documented distinctive lesion or dental pattern can provide much stronger evidence. A mismatch must be evaluated for record error, estimate uncertainty or exclusion, not silently ignored. Do not claim that nineteenth-century racial categories or a facial reconstruction uniquely determine identity. Soft-tissue features such as eye colour, hair and skin markings cannot simply be read off a bare human skeleton.

The modern extension is a specialist comparison of ante-mortem records with post-mortem observations, potentially supplemented by DNA profiling from suitable material. This is later corroboration, not a technique available in 1866. The institutional identification guidance emphasizes reconciliation of the two records and the importance of dental or genetic evidence for conclusive identification.^[ref]

The frog skeleton evolved through mosaic evolution: reorganization of the head and pelvis preceded completion of the compact, tailless, long-limbed jumping apparatus. Its principal transformations are shortening and stiffening of the axial skeleton, conversion of the posterior body into a sacrum–pelvis–urostyle system, and specialization of the appendicular skeleton for propulsion and landing. These are connected mechanically, but need not have evolved simultaneously or initially served the same function.

In the derived adult frog, the trunk is short, most species having eight or nine presacral vertebrae, and the ribs are strongly reduced or absent. The adult tail no longer consists of a long freely jointed series. Instead, the urostyle forms a posterior axial rod from caudal vertebral and associated developmental components. This increases the integration of the posterior body with the pelvic girdle. The ilium has an elongated, anteriorly directed shaft, placing much of the pelvic apparatus posterior to its sacral connection. Changes in the sacroiliac joint and adjacent musculature permit transmission of bilateral hindlimb thrust to the trunk. The urostyle is therefore more than a tail that simply shrank: it is part of a reorganized force-transmission system.

The limbs change in both proportion and construction. Elongate hindlimbs increase the possible extension stroke, and elongated proximal ankle elements, the tibiale and fibulare, add another effective segment to the propulsive chain. Union of tibia and fibula into a tibiofibula and of radius bone and ulna into a radioulna stiffens the lower limb segments. The forelimbs and pectoral girdle participate in support and absorption of landing forces, while the frog head is typically broad, short and flattened, with reduction and fusion of cranial elements, including integration of frontal and parietal components into a frontoparietal bone. These are generalizations about the characteristic skeleton, not a claim that every living frog is an obligate jumper: swimming, burrowing, climbing and walking lineages modify the inherited apparatus.

The decisive stem example is Triadobatrachus massinoti, from the Early Triassic of Madagascar, about 250 million years ago. It belongs to the frog total group, Salientia, outside crown Anura. Its phylogenetic importance is the association of recognizable frog-lineage features with retained ancestral construction. An anteriorly elongated ilium and frog-like cranial organization were already present, while a short series of separate caudal vertebrae persisted. The forearm and lower-leg pairs were not united into the modern radioulna and tibiofibula, and the hindlimbs lacked the full proportional specialization of powerful living jumpers. Thus pelvic reorganization did not require that all the later limb and tail modifications had already evolved.

The 2016 micro-computed tomography redescription is especially important because it revises the evidence rather than merely repeating an iconic reconstruction. It recognized 15 presacral vertebrae, with an atlas vertebra–axis vertebra complex, replacing the traditional interpretation of 14 with a divided atlas. Its trunk was therefore substantially less abbreviated in vertebral count than that of a typical living frog. Reconstructions under alternative amphibian relationships suggested that some proportional trunk reduction may already have occurred before the frog–salamander split, preceding the iliac elongation and tail shortening seen in this fossil. That inference depends on the comparative tree and model; vertebral number and actual trunk proportions are different characters. A count alone cannot demonstrate exactly how flexibly the animal moved.^[ref]

Locomotor inference requires an additional test. In 2016, Andrés I. Lires and colleagues compared major limb-bone lengths across 188 living limbed amphibians and lizards, relating their proportions to observed locomotor categories while considering shared ancestry. Triadobatrachus massinoti was better supported as using salamander-like lateral undulatory locomotion than as a specialized jumper. This is evidence against assuming that each frog-like skeletal feature originated as an adaptation for saltation. The limitations are that bone proportions are proxies for performance, living comparison sets may omit extinct combinations, and soft tissues and direct behaviour remain unknown. Failure to support specialized jumping does not exclude every short hop or vigorous hindlimb movement.^[ref]

Comparison with Prosalirus bitis, from the Early Jurassic, provides a later anatomical checkpoint. Its caudopelvic construction includes a urostyle, rod-like iliac organization and elongate hindlimbs, and was interpreted as supporting jumping through changes in pelvic orientation and iliosacral mobility. This comparison reinforces a sequence in which early frog-lineage pelvic and cranial modifications preceded completion of the more specialized locomotor system. It does not turn the named fossils into a direct ancestor–descendant chain, nor require every phylogenetic character to have followed exactly the same history in every branch.^[ref]

Triadobatrachus massinoti separates frog ancestry from fully developed frog jumping. It documents a combination that comparison of living frogs and salamanders alone could not predict reliably. The appropriate evolutionary explanation allows early changes in body support or movement to become exaptations for later saltation, followed by stronger specialization of the limbs and caudopelvic apparatus. Its retained tail and incompletely fused appendicular elements demonstrate staged assembly, while the revised vertebral interpretation shows why the ordering must remain anchored to observed anatomy.

Sarcopterygii is the clade comprising the most recent common ancestor of living coelacanths, lungfish and tetrapods, together with all its descendants. In this crown-based usage, humans are sarcopterygians: acquisition of limbs and loss of a fish-like outline do not remove descendants from a clade. Extinct taxa assigned along the stem require an explicitly broader total-group usage. A diagnosis lists characters useful for recognizing a group; a synapomorphy is a shared derived character whose position has been inferred on a phylogenetic tree. Those are related but not interchangeable statements.

Two particularly instructive traditional diagnostic features are the fleshy, internally supported paired appendages and true enamel associated with the dentition. The first survives conspicuously in our arms and legs. The second survives in our tooth crowns, although modern evidence requires qualification of its traditional status as an exclusively sarcopterygian innovation.

The paired-appendage transformation. A lobed fin contains musculature and a substantial endoskeleton extending into the appendage. In the relevant ancestral pattern, a single proximal skeletal element connects to the girdle: the humerus in the pectoral appendage, and the femur in the pelvic appendage. Subsequent elements elaborate the jointed internal axis. The important comparison is historical organization and articulations, not merely that both a fin and an arm contain bone. fins in other lineages also possess internal supporting elements, so the presence of any fin skeleton is too broad a diagnosis.

Within the lineage leading to tetrapods, the pectoral series can be recognized as humerus, radius bone and ulna, followed by increasingly elaborate distal elements. Tiktaalik retains fin rays but has a distal jointed skeleton capable of limb-like positioning against a substrate. Its combination of characters shows that parts of a wrist-like support system preceded a fully digit-bearing hand. Comparing several articulated specimens and the geometry of joint surfaces constrains the reconstruction better than matching isolated bones by outline.^[ref]

Further changes included anatomical digits, loss of external fin rays in the limb, changes to the girdles and altered force transmission through the trunk. They did not all arise simultaneously. Early digit-bearing tetrapods were not uniformly five-fingered terrestrial walkers; aquatic settings and polydactyly make it misleading to present the modern human hand as the immediate purpose or original endpoint of the transition. Acanthostega, with eight anatomical digits in its forelimb, supplies a concrete counterexample to an ancestrally universal five-digit condition.^[ref]

Our own upper limb retains the proximal single-bone and paired-bone organization, but the shoulder, elbow, wrist and fingers are extensively specialized. Rotation of the radius bone relative to the ulna contributes to turning the forearm; an opposable thumb and independently controlled fingers support grasping. In the lower limb, the femur, tibia and fibula show the corresponding serial organization, while the pelvis, hip, knee and foot transmit loads in habitual bipedalism. These are derived modifications within tetrapods, rather than defining traits of all Sarcopterygii. Comparing our arm with a fish pectoral fin concerns biological homology between organisms; comparing arm and leg also involves serial homology within the body.

The dental transformation and its qualification. human tooth crowns have an outer layer of enamel over dentine. enamel is highly mineralized and is produced by epithelial ameloblasts, whereas dentine is a different tissue formed by odontoblasts. Identifying a fossil surface as enamel therefore requires tissue architecture and developmental or molecular comparison, not simply a shiny hard covering. In our teeth the coating has specialized organization into enamel rods and contributes to wear resistance during biting and chewing. tooth classes and crown shapes diversify the ancestral feeding apparatus; they are not themselves basal sarcopterygian synapomorphies. After eruption, loss of the enamel-producing cellular layer severely limits biological replacement of worn crown enamel.

The traditional contrast between sarcopterygian true tooth enamel and other hard coverings needs an explicit historical correction. Qingming Qu and colleagues combined fossil histology with evidence for enamel-matrix genes in the skin of gar. In Psarolepis, external odontodes carried enamel while the teeth lacked an enamel coating. Their evidence supported an origin in dermal coverings followed by expansion into the mouth, and an ancestry deeper than Sarcopterygii alone.^[ref] Thus enamel and its oral deployment must be coded separately; tooth enamel remains a useful traditional diagnostic comparison, but the tissue itself is not a uniquely sarcopterygian synapomorphy. Shared tissue can undergo heterotopy, loss and later modification.

The two histories illustrate different forms of transformation visible in our bodies: an internally supported paired fin became a jointed, digit-bearing, specialized limb, and an inherited mineralized epithelial covering acquired a complex role in our dentition. A rigorous diagnosis states the anatomical level being compared and distinguishes inherited organization from later functional specialization. Neither the modern function nor the external human appearance determines membership of Sarcopterygii.

The popliteus is a posterior knee muscle connecting the proximal tibia with the lateral femoral region through its tendon. It contributes to controlling rotation and initiating flexion from extension. Its action depends on which skeletal segment is relatively fixed.

The posterior cruciate ligament links tibia and femur within the knee and restrains posterior translation of the tibia relative to the femur. Its effect depends on joint position and loading. It complements rather than duplicates the anterior cruciate ligament.

The quadriceps tendon transmits force from the quadriceps femoris to the patella. The distal patellar ligament continues the chain to the tibia. This arrangement lets the patella alter the leverage of the knee-extension apparatus.

The tibial collateral ligament is the medial supporting ligament of the knee, connecting femur and tibia. It helps resist medial opening under valgus loading and has close relations to the medial meniscus. Those attachments differ from the more separate lateral collateral arrangement.

The compound lower-leg element formed by union of the tibia and fibula in adult frogs.

The intermediate limb region containing the radius and ulna, or tibia and fibula, in familiar tetrapod limbs.