For a positive Borel measure on , let , using open balls in the uncentered maximal function of a finite measure. Every ball witnessing the inequality lies entirely in . Cover a compact subset by finitely many witnessing balls and select disjoint balls greedily by decreasing radius. Their threefold dilations cover the compact set. Their total measure is at most , giving the bound by inner regularity of Lebesgue measure. For a signed or complex measure, apply this to its total variation measure.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 8 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For , weak type with a normed domain means that there is a constant independent of and such thatHere consists of measurable functions modulo equality almost everywhere. A sublinear operator satisfies absolute homogeneity and the pointwise domination . In particular the definition controls the output's superlevel measures, not necessarily its strong norm. At , weak type is interpreted as the bound .
A useful theorem is dense approximation under a weak-type maximal bound. Let be linear operators indexed by parameters tending to zero, and let be another linear operator. Suppose there is a nonnegative sublinear operator of weak type such that , simultaneously in outside a null set for each input. Assume the suprema and limiting suprema used below are measurable. If almost everywhere for every in a dense subspace , then almost everywhere for every . For a sequence of operators all suprema are automatically countable; continuously parametrized averages below also have measurable suprema.
To prove the theorem, fix and . Outside the exceptional sets for these inputs, linearity and domination giveThus for every the set where this limiting error exceeds has measure at most . Choose a sequence converging to in norm and take the union of their null exceptional sets. Letting makes the bound zero. Taking countably many positive rational proves convergence almost everywhere. This proves the requested sufficient condition rather than merely invoking a convergence theorem.
For the measure estimate, give finite signed measures the total variation norm of a measure . The uncentered maximal function of a finite measure is sublinear because . Its set is open: it is precisely the union of open balls whose variation mass exceeds times their volume.
Fix a compact subset and select a finite cover of by these high-density balls. Order that finite collection by decreasing radius. Keep a ball if it is disjoint from all previously retained balls. Every discarded ball intersects a retained ball of at least its radius and is contained in that retained ball's triple dilation. The retained balls are disjoint and their triples cover . ThereforeBy inner regularity of Lebesgue measure, take the supremum over compact to obtainThis is the uncentered maximal weak-type inequality, and proves weak type even when the measure has atoms.
Finally work in dimension one. For define the linear operatorIts absolute value is bounded by : first enlarge the interval slightly to put inside an open interval and then let the enlargement tend to zero. The endpoint masses vanish because is absolutely continuous. Taking , both operators are dominated by . The maximal bound and the Markov inequality give .
Continuous compactly supported functions are dense in the L1 space, and their averages tend to their values as from either side. For a fixed , the interval integral varies continuously for , so the required suprema can be taken over rational and are measurable. Apply the proved weak-type theorem to conclude almost everywhere. Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 7 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a positive Borel measure , the centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal function and the uncentered maximal function of a finite measure areWe use open balls and allow infinite values. For signed or complex measures the definition uses their total variation measure. Since a centered ball is also an admissible uncentered ball, and every ball containing lies in ,For functions, means the centered Hardy-Littlewood maximal function of .
The set is the union of the open balls with . In particular, each witnessing ball lies entirely inside . If is compact, take a finite witnessing cover of . Choose its largest-radius ball, discard all balls meeting it, and repeat. The selected balls are disjoint. Every discarded ball has no larger radius than the selected ball that discarded it and is contained in its threefold dilation. HenceTaking the supremum over compact by inner regularity of Lebesgue measure proves the stronger, localized estimateIf the right side is infinite there is nothing to prove. Positivity of the measure is important: a signed version uses , not .
For the radial-kernel inequality, integrability implies . For , let be the unique radius with . The layer cake representation and Tonelli theorem giveThe last integral equals the total mass of , namely one. Taking the absolute value of the original convolution therefore proves the claim with constant exactly one. This is radial decreasing kernel domination by the maximal function.
An application is boundary convergence of the Poisson integral. Its normalized radial profile is , so . For a continuous compactly supported , the approximate identity property gives pointwise. For arbitrary , put ; thenThe preceding weak type (1,1) estimate and the elementary integral bound for show that the set where this exceeds has measure at most . Continuous compactly supported functions are dense in , so this measure is zero. Thus the Poisson integrals of an integrable function converge to it almost everywhere; the same approximate identity also gives convergence in .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 5 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Start with a finite subcover of the compact set . Among its remaining open balls, retain one of greatest radius and discard every ball intersecting it. Repeat until no balls remain. The retained family is finite and pairwise disjoint. If a discarded ball met the retained ball , then and . Therefore, for any ,Every original ball lies in the concentric triple of one retained ball. This proves the Wiener covering lemma for the finite subcover. By Lebesgue measure scaling and subadditivity,Disjointness givesThe empty compact set is covered by the empty selection.
The spherical derivative of a measure at is the limitwhen it exists, where is the unit-ball volume. We prove that this limit is zero outside a Lebesgue-null set for the singular measure.
First derive the needed maximal estimate from the selection lemma. For a finite positive Borel measure , putThis is the uncentered maximal function of a finite measure. For , its strict superlevel set is the union of all balls with , so it is open. Cover any compact subset of this set by such balls and apply the finite Wiener covering lemma. The selected disjoint balls giveBy inner regularity of Lebesgue measure, this proves the uncentered maximal weak-type inequality
Since and are mutually singular measures, there is a Borel set with and . By regularity of finite Borel measures on Euclidean space, for each choose compact with . Define the remainder measure .
For , distance from to this compact set is positive. Thus sufficiently small centered balls avoid , andWrite for the upper limit of the ratios. If it exceeds , then either or . HenceThe right side has Lebesgue measure at most , since . This even bounds the outer measure of the left side, without a separate measurability argument for the upper density. Let , and then take the countable union over positive rational . We obtain Lebesgue almost everywhere. The ratios are nonnegative, so their lower limit is also zero andThis proves that the spherical derivative of a singular measure vanishes. It is important to approximate the null carrier by compact subsets: a null carrier can be dense, so points outside it need not have any neighbourhood avoiding it.
In one dimension, consider the cumulative distribution function . For either sign of , monotonicity gives a nonnegative difference quotient, and the relevant half-open interval lies inside . In detail, the numerator is for , while after reversing both signs it is for . ThusAt each point where the spherical derivative of a measure is zero, this bound tends to zero from both sides. The enlarged open interval avoids any endpoint ambiguity from atoms. Therefore the ordinary two-sided derivative exists andThis is why singular distribution functions have zero derivative almost everywhere without having to be constant: almost-everywhere differentiation recovers increments only under extra hypotheses such as absolute continuity of a function.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 7 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The relevant version of Wiener covering lemma is the finite ball selection lemma: from a finite collection of open Euclidean balls one can select pairwise disjoint balls such that the original union is contained in , where has the same centre and three times the radius. To prove it, repeatedly retain a largest-radius remaining ball and discard every ball meeting it. If a discarded ball has radius and meets a retained ball of radius , every point of the former is at distance less than from the latter's centre. This proves the containment and, by scaling Lebesgue measure,This is a covering result; no Fourier-algebra version of Wiener's lemma is involved.
We use it for a disjoint ball decomposition modulo null sets of . The empty set needs only the empty family. Otherwise put . For an open residual set of positive finite measure, inner regularity of Lebesgue measure supplies a compact with . Cover by finitely many open balls whose closures lie in , and use the Wiener covering lemma to select disjoint balls. Their total measure is at least . Remove their closures to obtain the open residual set . Ball boundaries are null sets, soAll retained balls, including those from different stages, are pairwise disjoint and contained in . They form a countable family. The uncovered set is contained in together with their countably many boundaries, and both have measure zero. Enumerating the retained balls gives
Next consider the uncentered maximal function of a finite measure. For every real , its strict superlevel set isIndeed, membership in the ball is exactly the strict condition in the supremum. This union is open, proving that is lower semicontinuous as an extended nonnegative function; it may take the value infinity.
For , take a compact subset of this superlevel set and choose a finite cover by balls satisfying the displayed density inequality. The Wiener covering lemma selects disjoint balls whose triples cover . Since is a probability measure,Take the supremum over compact using inner regularity of Lebesgue measure. This works even if the open superlevel set was initially unbounded, and proves the uncentered maximal weak-type inequalityFor a finite positive measure of mass , scaling gives instead.
One important use is the Lebesgue differentiation theorem. For , approximate it in by a compactly supported continuous , and set . The limiting mean oscillation of at is at most , since that of vanishes by continuity. The preceding weak-type estimate and the elementary integral bound on giveLet the approximation error tend to zero and then take countably many . The local averages of converge to almost everywhere. Localizing extends this to locally integrable functions. Thus the maximal estimate turns norm approximation by continuous functions into almost-everywhere information about local averages.