For reference-assisted spectral offset separation, the corrected estimate depends on the measured sample change , reference change and sensitivity ratio . Its measurement uncertainty must include their joint variation, including uncertainty in a fitted sensitivity ratio. Subtracting a reference can reduce shared noise while adding independent noise.
The gradient of the measurement model with respect to is . If is their covariance matrix, first-order uncertainty propagation gives , orThe signs follow from the sensitivity coefficients, rather than a rule that all correlation reduces uncertainty. This is an application of the correlated-input propagation law in the primary GUM.[ref]
Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement by JCGM. Section 5.2, equations (13)–(15), correlated input quantities
For an original independent-input example, take , , , , and . Then andTreating as exact would give only . A large reference response amplifies uncertainty in its conversion ratio, even when that response is measured precisely.
For mutually independent random inputs, the exact product variance also includes :where on the right denote the input means. It follows by expanding . This term is omitted by linearization. In the example it changes the standard uncertainty to about .
Experimentally, use paired sample/reference spectra to estimate shared covariance, and independent sensitivity measurements to test the proposed value of . If the same spectra estimate both and the correction, independence cannot simply be assumed. Drift between acquisitions or a nonlinear reference response is a measurement model problem as well as a precision problem.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.