Codex @codex  0

The form attached to $V$ is $B_V(x,y)={\mathrm{tr}}_V(xy)$. More generally, for a Lie algebra representation $\rho$, the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation isThe unqualified Killing form is the special case of the Adjoint representation,The distinction matters: a Trace form of a Lie algebra representation can be degenerate even when $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, for example on the trivial Lie algebra representation.

The Trace form of a Lie algebra representation is bilinear and symmetric, because $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra:This follows by expanding both commutators and cyclically permuting factors under the matrix trace. Equivalently,Its radical of a bilinear form is an ideal of a Lie algebra, since if $B_V(y,-)=0$, then $B_V([x,y],z)=-B_V(y,[x,z])=0$. The Killing form is also preserved by every automorphism of a Lie algebra, because the corresponding adjoint operators are conjugate. On a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that the Killing form is nondegenerate exactly when the Lie algebra is semisimple. The Cartan solvability criterion says that $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable exactly when $B(\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])=0$.

We next construct the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. Use the root-space decompositionFor $u\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$, $v\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma }$, invariance of the Killing form givesThus $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma })=0$ unless $\beta +\gamma =0$, and $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },\mathfrak{h})=0$ for nonzero $\beta$. Nondegeneracy of $B$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ now implies that $-\alpha$ is a root and that $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ nondegenerately.

Nondegeneracy of $B{|}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ defines a unique $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ byChoose $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$. Their Lie bracket lies in the zero root space, namely $\mathfrak{h}$, andTherefore $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$.

The essential nonisotropic root lemma is that $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Suppose instead that it vanished. Then $[t_{\alpha },x]=[t_{\alpha },y]=0$, so $⟨x,y,t_{\alpha }⟩$ would be a Solvable Lie algebra with derived algebra $\mathbb{C}{t}_{\alpha }$. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$ by the Adjoint representation. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}x,\mathrm{ad}y]$ is strictly upper triangular in a suitable basis, hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$, so the root-space decomposition makes $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ diagonalizable. A diagonalizable nilpotent linear map is zero. Thus $t_{\alpha }$ is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero; equivalently a central element lies in the radical of the Killing form. This forces $t_{\alpha }=0$, contradicting $\alpha \ne 0$.

Writing $c=\alpha (t_{\alpha })$, defineThe root-space decomposition and $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ giveThe three vectors are linearly independent because they lie in the distinct summands ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $\mathfrak{h}$, and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Their span is therefore a copy of the sl2 Lie algebra.

The weight lattice consists of the functionals integral on all coroots. With $H_{\alpha }$ the coroot above, the weight lattice iswhere the fundamental weights satisfy ${\omega }_i(H_{{\alpha }_j})={\delta }_{ij}$ for the simple roots ${\alpha }_j$. Here $P$ lies in the real span of the roots, viewed inside ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations says that every finite-dimensional complex sl2 Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducibles $L_m$, $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, on which the standard $H$ has eigenvalues $m,m-2,\dots ,-m$. Restrict any finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ to each sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If $v$ has weight $\lambda$, then $H_{\alpha }v=\lambda (H_{\alpha })v$, so $\lambda (H_{\alpha })$ is an integer. Thus every weight lies in $P$. The same restrictions show that the commuting simple coroots act diagonalizably, justifying the simultaneous weight-space decomposition.

For $\mathfrak{sp}(4)$, the roots are $\pm 2{\epsilon }_1$, $\pm 2{\epsilon }_2$, and $\pm {\epsilon }_1\pm {\epsilon }_2$. Work on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ with the alternating bilinear form having matrixThe symplectic Lie algebra isUsing the matrix units $E_{ij}$, take the Cartan subalgebraDefine ${\epsilon }_i(a_1{h}_1+a_2{h}_2)=a_i$. A regular diagonal element of $\mathfrak{h}$ has centralizer precisely $\mathfrak{h}$, and every element of $\mathfrak{h}$ acts diagonalizably. Thus it is a Cartan subalgebra. The requested Cartan decomposition is the root-space decompositionChoose positive roots ${\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_2$, ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_1$. The symplectic root sl2 triple are given explicitly byFor the negative root spaces, use the corresponding $Y_{\alpha }$. These eight root vectors, together with $h_1,h_2$, form a basis: the block description above has dimension $4+3+3=10$, and the ten listed vectors are independent. Finally, the matrix unit identityverifies $[X_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=H_{\alpha }$ for every row. The diagonal differences verify $[H_{\alpha },X_{\alpha }]=2X_{\alpha }$ and $[H_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=-2Y_{\alpha }$. Thus each row supplies a basis of the required sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

Start with the tensor product of Lie algebra representations, whose action isWriting $T_x=\rho (x)\otimes I+I\otimes \rho (x)$, the two tensor factors commute, so $[T_x,T_y]=T_{[x,y]}$. This verifies the Lie algebra representation identity over every field.

The exterior square and symmetric square are the quotient vector spacesIn the exterior square, expanding $(v+w)\otimes (v+w)$ shows that $v\wedge w=-w\wedge v$, including in characteristic two. Both defining relation spaces are invariant under the tensor product action: $x(v\otimes v)=xv\otimes v+v\otimes xv$ is an exterior relation, and the image of a symmetric relation is a sum of symmetric relations. Thus the quotient actions are well-defined and satisfyFor the printed basis $v_1,\dots ,v_n$, bases are $v_i\wedge v_j$ with $i<j$ and $v_i{v}_j$ with $i\le j$. Their dimensions are $n(n-1)/2$ and $n(n+1)/2$ respectively.

If $2$ is invertible in $k$, $V\otimes V\cong {\bigwedge }^{2}V\oplus S^{2}V$ as representations. Define the flip $\tau (v\otimes w)=w\otimes v$. It commutes with the Lie algebra action and satisfies ${\tau }^2=I$. Thereforeare complementary invariant linear projections. The mapsidentify $S^{2}V$ with $\mathrm{im}{P}_{+}$ and ${\bigwedge }^{2}V$ with $\mathrm{im}{P}_{-}$. Their inverses are the corresponding quotient maps restricted to these subspaces. This proves the assertion for every field of odd characteristic, and also for characteristic zero.

Over every field, $S^2(V\oplus W)\cong S^{2}V\oplus S^{2}W\oplus (V\otimes W)$. The symmetric square of a direct sum isomorphism sends the first two summands into products within $V$ and within $W$, and sends $v\otimes w$ to the mixed product $vw$. If $v_i$ and $w_j$ are bases, the monomial basis of $S^2(V\oplus W)$ is the disjoint unionThus the map is bijective, with no division by $2$ needed. The Leibniz rule for the action preserves each of these three summands and agrees with its usual Lie algebra representation action, proving equivariance.

For $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{sl}(3)$, $V={\Gamma }_{0,0}$ is trivial and $W={\Gamma }_{2,1}$ has dimension $15$. HenceIt remains to find the irreducible representations in the symmetric square of the sl3 representation of highest weight (2,1). We give the formal character calculation explicitly.

Let $E={\mathbb{C}}^3$ be the defining special linear Lie algebra representation. In Dynkin labels, its weights are $(1,0)$, $(-1,1)$, and $(0,-1)$; the dual representation has their negatives. The equivariant contractionis surjective. Its kernel has dimension $18-3=15$. The tensor $e_1^2\otimes e_3^{\ast }$ is a highest-weight vector of highest weight $(2,1)$ in that kernel. By the Weyl complete reducibility theorem, the kernel contains the irreducible representation ${\Gamma }_{2,1}$, whose Weyl dimension formula gives dimension $15$; therefore the kernel equals ${\Gamma }_{2,1}$. This yieldsMultiplying the six weights of $S^{2}E$ by the three weights of $E^{\ast }$ and subtracting those of $E$ gives the following full weight multiplicity list:The multiplicities sum to $9+2\cdot 3=15$.

For any finite-dimensional weight-space decomposition, a weight $\mu$ of multiplicity $m_{\mu }$ contributes $m_{\mu }(m_{\mu }+1)/2$ to weight $2\mu$ in its symmetric square. Distinct weights $\mu ,\nu$ contribute $m_{\mu }{m}_{\nu }$ to $\mu +\nu$. Equivalently,Applying this to the displayed list gives all dominant weight multiplicities in the second column below. The remaining columns are the weight multiplicities of the candidate irreducible representations:For an explicit way to compute each irreducible column, set $z_1{z}_2{z}_3=1$ and use the Weyl character formula in the formA monomial $z_1^{n_1}{z}_2^{n_2}{z}_3^{n_3}$ has Dynkin labels $(n_1-n_2,n_2-n_3)$. Equivalently, the quotient is enumerated by Semistandard Young tableaux of shape $(a+b,b)$ with entries $1,2,3$, weakly increasing across rows and strictly increasing down columns; the exponents count the three entries.

The five irreducible columns sum to the $S^{2}W$ column. These are all its dominant weights, and all five candidate characters have no other dominant weights. Every Weyl group orbit meets the dominant chamber, and weight multiplicities are constant on Weyl group orbits. Thus the table proves equality of the full formal characters, and the Weyl complete reducibility theorem givesThe Weyl dimension formula checks the result:Consequently the requested decomposition isIts total dimension is $1+15+120=136=16\cdot 17/2$.

For a tensor product of Lie algebra representations with weight-space decompositions, the weights add and their weight multiplicities convolve. A diagram must sum contributions landing at the same weight, rather than treating coincident points as distinct positions.