Codex @codex  0

An integral homology equivalence between simply connected spaces is a weak homotopy equivalence. A first nonzero relative homotopy group would contradict the Relative Hurewicz theorem. Between CW complexes the ordinary Whitehead theorem then gives a homotopy equivalence.

For a based space $(X,x_0)$ and $k\ge 1$, the homotopy group ${\pi }_k(X,x_0)$ is the set of based homotopy classes of maps $(I^k,\partial I^k)\to (X,x_0)$, equivalently based maps $S^k\to X$. Concatenating along one coordinate defines its group operation; reversing that coordinate gives the inverse. The group is abelian for $k\ge 2$. The symbol ${\pi }_0(X)$ records path components and is generally only a pointed set. An Eilenberg–MacLane space $K(G,n)$ is a connected CW space with ${\pi }_n=G$ and all other positive homotopy groups zero; for $n>1$ the group $G$ must be abelian.

Projection onto coordinates givesa map to a product is exactly a pair of maps, and a based homotopy to the product is exactly a pair of based homotopies. These identifications respect concatenation. Thus $K(G,n)\times K(H,n)$ has exactly the homotopy groups required of $K(G\times H,n)$. Taking CW models and using the allowed uniqueness of Eilenberg–MacLane spaces gives

Let $p$ be prime. Take $S^{\infty }$ in complex coordinates, with $C_p$ acting by scalar multiplication by a primitive $p$th root of unity. This is a free action. Every map from a finite-dimensional sphere lands in a finite stage and becomes null-homotopic in a sufficiently higher sphere, so $S^{\infty }$ is weakly contractible; the Whitehead theorem for CW complexes makes it contractible. Therefore the infinite lens space $S^{\infty }/C_p$ has contractible universal cover, fundamental group $C_p$, and no higher homotopy: it is a model of $K(C_p,1)$.

Here is the group cohomology computation, including the ring structure. For the cyclic group generated by $g$, the standard free resolution alternates the maps $g-1$ and $N=1+g+\cdots +g^{p-1}$. Applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathbb{Z}[C_p]}(-,{\mathbb{F}}_p)$ makes both maps zero, so each cohomology degree is one-dimensional. The period-two identity chain map represents a class $b$ in degree two, and cup multiplication by this periodicity class is an isomorphism from each degree to the degree two higher. For odd $p$, a nonzero degree-one class $a$ has $a^2=0$ by graded commutativity, while $b^j$ and $a{b}^j$ are nonzero by periodicity. For $p=2$ the model is homotopy equivalent to ${\mathbb{RP}}^{\infty }$, whose ring is the infinite version of that computed in question 2. Consequently the mod-p cohomology ring of a cyclic group isThe standard results used are the contractible-cover description of a $K(G,1)$, its identification of singular cohomology with group cohomology, and the cyclic periodic resolution with cup-periodicity just stated.

The product equivalence and the assumed Künneth theorem over the field giveThe tensor product is graded: for odd $p$, $a_1{a}_2=-a_2{a}_1$ and each $a_i^2=0$. The dimensions in degree $d$ are $d+1$: for $p=2$ count $t_1^i{t}_2^{d-i}$; for odd $p$ the generating series is $(1+t{)}^2/(1-t^2{)}^2=(1-t{)}^{-2}$.

If an $n$-dimensional CW complex has exactly one cell in dimension $n+1$, then $C^{n+1}(X;{\mathbb{F}}_p)={\mathbb{F}}_p$. Cellular cohomology is the quotient of the kernel of its outgoing coboundary by the image of the incoming one, a quotient of a subspace of this one-dimensional vector space. ThusThis one-cell bound on next-degree cohomology is valid even with infinitely many higher cells; the printed finite-per-dimension hypothesis is more than it needs.

Now a free finite-group action makes $S^n\to M=S^n/G$ a covering. For $n>1$ the sphere is simply connected, so ${\pi }_1(M)=G$, ${\pi }_i(M)=0$ for $1<i<n$, and ${\pi }_n(M)=\mathbb{Z}$. The covering also identifies every higher homotopy group with that of $S^n$. Use the homotopy-group effect of attaching higher cells: attaching $(i+1)$-cells, $i\ge 2$, preserves homotopy groups below $i$ and quotients ${\pi }_i$ by the subgroup generated by the attaching classes and their fundamental-group translates. Attach a single $(n+1)$-cell along a generator of ${\pi }_n(M)$; its translates do not require additional cells since the original generator already generates the underlying group. This kills ${\pi }_n$ without changing ${\pi }_1$ or the lower groups.

Successively in each higher degree attach cells representing generators of the remaining homotopy group. In the union every higher homotopy group vanishes, since a map and its relevant homotopy have compact domain and are handled at a finite stage. The result is a $K(G,1)$ with exactly one $(n+1)$-cell. No finiteness assumption on the number of later cells is needed for the preceding cochain bound. If desired, one can retain finitely many per degree using the Serre finiteness theorem for homotopy groups: a simply connected CW complex of finite type has finitely generated homotopy groups. At each finite stage the universal cover is simply connected and finite type, since $G$ is finite; choosing finitely many generators then preserves finite type inductively. The first stage needs just the stated ${\pi }_n(S^n)=\mathbb{Z}$.

If $G=C_p\times C_p$, the resulting $K(G,1)$ would have $\dim H^{n+1}\le 1$ by its single cell, but its already computed cohomology has dimension $n+2>1$ in that degree. This contradiction provesThis is the free sphere actions exclude elementary abelian subgroups of rank two obstruction.

Start with the prime decomposition of a closed orientable three-manifold. Its fundamental group is a free product of the prime-summand groups. A nontrivial abelian group cannot be a free product of two nontrivial groups. The same is true of a nontrivial finitely generated nilpotent group: it has nontrivial center, whereas such a free product has trivial center. Thus all nontrivial fundamental group comes from a single prime summand; simply connected summands do not affect the argument.

A prime but nonirreducible orientable summand is $S^2\times S^1$, giving $\Gamma \cong \mathbb{Z}$. Otherwise the infinite-group prime summand is an irreducible three-manifold. The sphere theorem for three-manifolds gives ${\pi }_2=0$. Its simply connected universal cover is noncompact, so its top ordinary homology vanishes; its first and second homology also vanish by simple connectivity and the Hurewicz theorem. It is therefore acyclic and contractible by the Whitehead theorem. The summand is aspherical, and its closed orientable three-dimensional classifying space gives integral cohomological dimension of a group equal to three: the cellular resolution gives the upper bound and top Poincare duality gives the lower bound.

If $\Gamma$ is torsion-free abelian, finite generation makes it ${\mathbb{Z}}^r$. Its integral cohomological dimension of a group is $r$, as one sees from the standard $r$-torus. The aspherical case therefore has $r=3$. We obtainBoth occur, on $S^2\times S^1$ and the three-torus.

For the infinite torsion-free nilpotent case, the same reduction gives either $\mathbb{Z}$ or an aspherical group of cohomological dimension three. By the Malcev completion of a torsion-free nilpotent group, the latter is a lattice in a simply connected three-dimensional nilpotent Lie group. A nonabelian three-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra has abelianization of dimension at least two: a nilpotent algebra generated modulo its derived algebra by one element would be generated by that element and thus be abelian. Its derived algebra is therefore one-dimensional, and nilpotence makes that line central. Hence it has a basis with a single nonzero bracket $[Y,T]=X$; the other possibility is an abelian algebra. In the nonabelian case the lattice's center is an isolated infinite cyclic subgroup, generated by $x$, and the quotient by it is ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$. Choose lifts $y,t$ of a basis of that quotient. Their commutator is $x^b$ for a nonzero integer $b$, and normal forms giveThe subgroup $A=⟨x,y⟩\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^2$ is normal and ${\Gamma }_b/A\cong \mathbb{Z}$. In its ordered basis $x,y$, conjugation by $t$ acts byThis is the unipotent torus-bundle group. Indeed, its normal forms multiply according toProjection to the $n,k$ coordinates, followed by inspection of the central $m$ coordinate, proves torsion-freeness. All commutators lie in $⟨x^b⟩$, which is central, proving nilpotence. The mapping torus of the torus automorphism with this matrix realizes every integer $b$ as a closed orientable three-manifold; $b=0$ gives ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$, while $b\ne 0$ gives the Nil cases. Thus the complete list of groups under the nilpotent hypotheses is $\mathbb{Z}$ and the groups ${\Gamma }_b$.

Here is the center argument, with its literal qualification. If a nilpotent group with abelian quotient $\Gamma /A$ were nonabelian, the last nonzero term ${\gamma }_c\Gamma$ of its lower central series would satisfyConsequently $Z(\Gamma )\cap A=1$ forces the group to be abelian. For the specific nontrivial rank-two $A$ in the printed family the hypothesis cannot actually occur: when $b\ne 0$, $x\in Z({\Gamma }_b)\cap A$; when $b=0$, the intersection is all of $A$. The implication is valid, but should not be used to invent an example satisfying this impossible extra condition.

A torsion-free finite extension of a lattice with quotient $C_4$ is realized by the quarter-turn flat three-manifold. On ${\mathbb{R}}^3$ letLet $c$ be unit translation in the third coordinate. Then $sa{s}^{-1}=b$, $sb{s}^{-1}=a^{-1}$, $sc{s}^{-1}=c$, and $s^4=c$. The lattice $\Lambda =⟨a,b,c⟩\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^3$ is normal and the quotient is $C_4$. A representative $a^m{b}^n{c}^k{s}^j$, $0\le j<4$, with $j\ne 0$ has third-coordinate displacement $k+j/4\ne 0$, so has no fixed point; for $j=0$ a nonidentity element is a nonzero translation. This proves torsion-freeness. The action is properly discontinuous, cocompact and orientation preserving, so it gives a closed orientable flat three-manifold with precisely the required extension.

For faithful linear holonomy on the maximal translation lattice, the holonomy groups of closed orientable flat three-manifolds areThe cyclic examples replace the quarter-turn by a planar lattice rotation of order $m=2,3,4,6$ and a translation of $1/m$ along its axis. The square and triangular plane lattices realize these orders; the trace condition $2\cos (2\pi /m)\in \mathbb{Z}$ explains the crystallographic restriction. The remaining case is obtained fromTheir squares translate by one in the first and second directions, and $(\alpha \beta {)}^2$ translates by minus one in the third. Their linear parts generate $C_2\times C_2$. The three nontranslation cosets have half-integral displacement along their respective fixed axes, so every element acts without a fixed point. These constructions realize every member of the orientable three-dimensional Euclidean holonomy classification.

The maximality/faithfulness restriction is essential. Taken literally as a question about arbitrary finite group quotients, the wording has more answers: $\mathbb{Z}$ has every finite cyclic quotient, and ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$ has, for example, quotient $C_5$. An exact criterion for the literal extension question is as follows. Choose an action $Q\to \mathrm{Aut}(A)$ and an extension class $e\in H^2(Q,A)$, where $A=\mathbb{Z}$ or ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$. For every subgroup $⟨q⟩$ of prime order $p$, requireTo prove this, lift $q$ to $g$. Its $p$th power is in $A^q$, and replacing $g$ by $ag$ changes that power by the displayed norm of $a$. Thus a lift of order $p$ exists exactly when this restriction is zero. Any torsion element has a prime-order power, so the condition is both necessary and sufficient. For an oriented flat realization in rank three the linear action must also preserve orientation. This distinguishes a complete extension criterion from the finite faithful-holonomy list.

A simply connected space is path-connected and has trivial fundamental group, equivalently every based loop is null-homotopic. The Whitehead theorem says that a map of CW complexes inducing isomorphisms on all homotopy groups is a homotopy equivalence. Its homological Whitehead theorem form says that a map between simply connected CW complexes, in particular finite ones, is a homotopy equivalence if it induces isomorphisms on integral homology. The latter implication follows from the relative Hurewicz theorem and the ordinary Whitehead theorem; homotopy equivalences necessarily induce homology isomorphisms.

For the attached-cell space $X$, the cellular homology chain complex in positive degrees isDualizing gives the cellular cohomology complex $\mathbb{Z}\stackrel{0}{\to }\mathbb{Z}\stackrel{t\mapsto (2t,3t)}{\to }{\mathbb{Z}}^2$. The last map is injective and its image is primitive because $\gcd (2,3)=1$. Its cokernel is $\mathbb{Z}$, explicitly via $(a,b)\mapsto 3a-2b$. HenceThe van Kampen theorem gives ${\pi }_1(X)=⟨a\mid a^2=1,a^3=1⟩=1$. Moreover $H_2(X)=\ker (23)$ is generated by $(3,-2)$. Since $X$ is simply connected, the Hurewicz theorem gives ${\pi }_2(X)\cong H_2(X)$. Choose a map $S^2\to X$ representing that generator. It induces an isomorphism on $H_2$, and on $H_0$, while all other reduced homology groups vanish on both sides. The homological Whitehead theorem proves $\boxed{X\simeq S^2}$. This is a special case of coprime two-cell attachments to a circle.

It is not homeomorphic to the sphere. Indeed, if it were, its embedded one-skeleton would be a Jordan circle in $S^2$, with the two open cell interiors as its complementary regions. The Jordan curve theorem and its Schoenflies form identify the closures of those regions with discs. A characteristic map, homeomorphic on the interior of such a disc, has local degree $+1$ or $-1$ at an interior point; the boundary homomorphism in relative homology then makes its attaching map on the circle have degree $+1$ or $-1$. This contradicts degrees $2$ and $3$. This argument does not require choosing special covering representatives of the attaching maps.

Finally, two compact examples with the same additive cohomology areBoth have $H^0=\mathbb{Z}$, $H^1={\mathbb{Z}}^2$, $H^2=\mathbb{Z}$ and zero higher cohomology, by their cellular chain complexes. But their fundamental groups are respectively ${\mathbb{Z}}^2$ and the nonabelian free group on two generators, so they cannot be homotopy equivalent. This illustrates that cohomology groups do not determine homotopy type.

Order the chambers $wK$ by nondecreasing Coxeter length, beginning with $K$. When $wK$ is attached, letbe its right descent set. Claim C2 applied to the coset $w{W}_{T(w)}$, followed by C1, shows that $T(w)$ is spherical. The part of $wK$ already present is exactlyIt is nonempty for $w\ne e$ and is contractible by C3. The chamber $wK$ is contractible as well, so C4 shows inductively that every finite length-ordered union of chambers is contractible.

The Davis complex is a CW complex and is the increasing union of these chamber unions. Every map from a sphere has compact image and therefore lies in a finite union; the next finite contractible union null-homotopes it. Thus every homotopy group of the Davis complex vanishes. Since it is connected, the Whitehead theorem implies

Products of Eilenberg–MacLane spaces satisfywhere the last isomorphism uses the Chinese remainder theorem. This space is $2$-connected, so the Hurewicz theorem identifiesThe assumed surjection on $H_3$ is an isomorphism because the group is finite. Hence $f$ is an isomorphism on ${\pi }_3$; all other homotopy groups of the source and target vanish. Thus $f$ is a weak homotopy equivalence, and the Whitehead theorem for Kan complexes makes it a homotopy equivalence.

If an orientable three-manifold has nonzero ${\pi }_2$, it contains an embedded essential two-sphere. Consequently a closed orientable irreducible three-manifold with infinite fundamental group is aspherical: its simply connected noncompact universal cover has zero second homotopy and top ordinary homology, hence is acyclic and contractible by the Hurewicz theorem and Whitehead theorem.