Lower ramification numbering Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-07
For all real , this definition uses the normalized integral valuation on . Equivalently . The group is the inertia group and is the wild inertia group.
For the finite Galois extension, normalize the discrete valuation to have value group . The inertia group is
The lower ramification numbering is
The wild inertia group is , and the tame inertia quotient is . We will prove that is a -group, where , and that is cyclic of order prime to . Tame inertia here is a quotient, not a specified canonical subgroup complementary to .
First reduce the inertia calculation to a totally ramified extension. Choose generating the finite residue extension . Its minimal polynomial is separable. Lift that monic polynomial to , and use Hensel lemma in to obtain a root with residue . Irreducibility of the reduction implies irreducibility of over , by the monic form of the Gauss lemma for polynomials over a discrete valuation ring. Thus has degree and residue field ; the degree formula makes unramified. An automorphism fixes precisely when it fixes : the nontrivial direction is uniqueness in Hensel lemma. Hence , and is totally ramified.
Use the permitted integral-generation fact . Every element of fixes the coefficients in this expression. The identity consequently proves the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups:
Necessity follows by testing , and the displayed power identity proves sufficiency for every integral polynomial in .
Define the uniformizer character of inertia
It is multiplicative: writing , one has , and acts trivially on residue units. Its kernel is exactly , namely . Changing the uniformizer to leaves the residue character unchanged, since . Therefore
Every finite subgroup of a field's multiplicative group is cyclic: if its exponent is , every element is a root of , so its order is at most ; a finite abelian group has an element of order its exponent, constructed by multiplying elements of maximal prime-power orders, so its order is at least . Equality makes it cyclic. Here has order , prime to . We have proved
To verify the assertion about wild inertia as well, for define
Write and . Composition gives , because inertia fixes residues and . Thus is additive with kernel . Thus positive ramification quotients are elementary abelian: each is a subgroup of the additive finite field, hence an elementary abelian -group.
Finally the filtration terminates: a nonidentity element of cannot fix , since it already fixes and . Its displacement has finite valuation, and there are only finitely many automorphisms. Iterating the finite -group quotients gives that is a -group. It is normal in and has prime-to- quotient, so it is its unique Sylow -subgroup, justifying the wild inertia terminology.
Let , with normalized discrete valuations . Suppose first that is totally ramified, so . Choose a uniformizer of . The elements are linearly independent over : the nonzero terms in any proposed relation have valuations , distinct modulo , and a sum with a unique least valuation cannot vanish by the ultrametric inequality. Hence , proving .
Extend to an algebraic closure with values in . Every conjugate of has valuation , by uniqueness of the extended valuation on finite extensions of the complete field . In its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element , the coefficient is a sum of products of conjugates, counted with multiplicity. Thus for , so every nonleading coefficient is in . The constant coefficient is the product of all conjugates, so has valuation exactly one. This proves that is an Eisenstein polynomial. This argument also works for inseparable finite extensions, since the conjugates can be counted with their multiplicities.
Conversely let be an Eisenstein polynomial of degree , with root and . The Eisenstein criterion proves irreducibility. For completeness, monic factors would have integral coefficients; their reductions would be positive-degree powers of , so both constant coefficients would be divisible by the uniformizer of , contradicting . To determine the root valuation, put in the extended valuation. If , the leading term is the unique term of least valuation; if , the leading term again has uniquely least valuation zero. Both are impossible. If , every nonconstant lower term has valuation at least . Cancellation in therefore requires the leading term and constant term to have equal valuation:
Since and is a positive integer, . The opposite inequality follows from . Hence , , and . We have proved both the equivalence and the uniformizer assertion:
Now take with and . The translated cyclotomic polynomial is
In characteristic , putting reduces this to . Its constant coefficient over the integers is . It is therefore Eisenstein at , of degree . Consequently is totally ramified of degree , with uniformizer . If , the field is simply , a trivial totally ramified extension.
For a general positive integer with , the field generated by the prime-to- root of unity is unramified. Indeed has distinct roots modulo . In a finite unramified field whose residue field contains those roots, Hensel lemma lifts all of them uniquely. Reduction preserves their orders: a prime-to- root reducing to one must itself be one, by Hensel uniqueness at the root one of . The arithmetic Frobenius therefore acts as , and the extension degree is the multiplicative order of modulo , with degree one when .
The identity
follows by taking powers of a primitive nth root of unity and using the coprimality of in the opposite direction. The prime-to- field is unramified and the -power field is totally ramified; unramified base change preserves total ramification proves that their compositum has the same residue degree as the prime-to- field. Thus the total ramification criterion for local cyclotomic extensions gives the full classification:
This includes trivial extensions when . For only is possible.
For a finite totally ramified Galois extension with Galois group , define its lower ramification numbering by
Here is the inertia group, which equals , and is the wild inertia group. For a uniformizer the condition is equivalent to . To justify this uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups, expand every as a convergent series with the coefficients chosen from representatives of in . Such an expansion is obtained by successive subtraction of a residue representative and division by , since total ramification gives . The automorphism fixes each , and is divisible by . Thus the required valuation bound for implies it for every , including the limit by completeness.
For , all primitive conjugates lie in and the Eisenstein degree is . Hence
If , put , so . The element is a primitive th root of unity. Applying the already proved uniformizer result to its field, and multiplying its valuation by the ramification index of over that field, gives
The identity automorphism has infinite valuation. Therefore the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension is explicitly
The order of the middle group is . At odd , has order ; at , the condition is automatic, so when . The case has trivial Galois group, and the displayed formula remains valid. For all groups are trivial. The valuation calculation also provides the upper ramification numbering, if desired, by integrating the reciprocal indices with the Herbrand function; no change of numbering is implicit in the displayed answer.
Let be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, with Galois group , normalized valuation , integer ring , and residue characteristic . The lower ramification numbering is
These higher ramification groups measure successively finer agreement with the identity. The group is the inertia group, the kernel of the action on the residue field. Each is normal in : conjugation permutes integral elements and preserves their valuations. The groups eventually become trivial, since each nonidentity automorphism moves some integral element and its displacement has finite valuation.
Let , the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension. Then is the Galois group of the residue extension, cyclic and generated by a Frobenius automorphism. For a uniformizer of , the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups gives
To see why one uniformizer suffices, the extension is totally ramified and its integer ring is . Elements of fix its coefficients. Differences of powers of are divisible by , so the valuation bound for implies it for every integral element. The converse follows by testing itself.
The tame inertia quotient is seen explicitly from
It is a homomorphism because inertia acts trivially on the residue field, and its kernel is . Thus is cyclic of order not divisible by . For , the homomorphism
has kernel . Indeed composing two automorphisms adds the leading displacements, since and inertia fixes residue coefficients. Hence each is an elementary abelian p-group. Eventual triviality makes a p-group; the prime-to-p quotient makes it the unique Sylow subgroup of . This is the wild inertia group. Tame ramification means .
The filtration also measures the different exponent. For the totally ramified extension over , the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element of has polynomial roots , . The derivative formula gives
For a fixed , its displacement valuation is the number of indices for which it belongs to . Interchanging the finite sums therefore gives different exponent from ramification groups:
The unramified part contributes zero. More generally different in a tower follows by taking products of bases of a module dual for the trace pairing, and gives
Thus a tame extension has different exponent , while nontrivial wild groups contribute additional positive terms.
The lower numbering restricts to subgroups: if , its groups are , directly from the definition using the same top-field valuation. Quotients need a different indexing. For real put and define the Herbrand function
This upper ramification numbering stretches or compresses intervals according to the inertia indices. The quotient theorem says that for a normal subgroup , upper ramification groups commute with quotients:
In particular the same upper index has a meaning compatible with passing to a smaller Galois extension, which lower indices generally lack.
For a tame totally ramified extension the picture is simple: , all with are trivial, and the different exponent is . The extension for odd illustrates this, giving exponent .
A mixed-characteristic wild family is the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension. Take with odd and . If and modulo , then
The last equality follows because has order and its uniformizer valuation scales by the ramification index in that cyclotomic tower. The lower breaks are . Integrating the successive indices gives upper breaks .
In equal characteristic there is an equally explicit wild example. Start with and an Artin–Schreier extension
There is no polynomial root in : a negative-valuation element has , while the right side has valuation . Adjoining a polynomial root splits the polynomial, whose polynomial roots are for , so the extension is cyclic of degree . The valuation equation forces total ramification, and . Choose with and set . Then is a uniformizer. For a nonidentity automorphism ,
the first binomial coefficient is nonzero modulo , and all subsequent terms have strictly higher valuation. Therefore
This is the ramification break of an Artin–Schreier pole. It shows concretely that wild breaks, unlike tame inertia, can occur arbitrarily far out in the filtration.
The lower groups measure integral displacements, the upper groups make quotient comparison possible, and the sizes of the groups determine the different.
The polynomial is Eisenstein at every prime number , so a polynomial root generates a totally ramified cubic field . The splitting-field Galois group is a transitive subgroup of , hence or . Its polynomial discriminant is
The product of the three polynomial root differences is a square root of , transformed by the sign of the polynomial root permutation. Thus the group is exactly when is a square, and otherwise it is . In the latter case the splitting field is
Indeed adjoining one polynomial root leaves a quadratic factor, whose polynomial discriminant is , so the square root of supplies its remaining polynomial roots.
Suppose first that . The unit reduces to , and Hensel's lemma makes it a square exactly when is a square modulo . Quadratic reciprocity gives
If , the field generated by is already the cyclic splitting field, totally ramified of degree three. If , the nonsquare unit gives an unramified quadratic field . Since and have coprime degrees, . Its residue degree is at least two and its ramification index at least three; their product is six, so they are exactly two and three. Thus its inertia group is the normal inside .
In both cases the ramification index is three and is not divisible by . The wild inertia group is trivial, so all positive lower groups are trivial. As a different check, has valuation two in when , agreeing with tame different exponent .
For the polynomial discriminant is , which is nonsquare. Hence . The quadratic subfield can be written with . It is ramified of degree two, by the Eisenstein polynomial . Together with the totally ramified cubic field this forces to be divisible by both two and three. Since , the splitting field is totally ramified. In its normalized valuation,
All differences between distinct polynomial roots have the same valuation, since permutes the polynomial root pairs and preserves the absolute value on a field. Also
has valuation six, so each polynomial root difference has valuation three. A nonidentity three-cycle fixes , and therefore
The transposition fixing negates , so sends to and has displacement valuation . The other transpositions have the same value by conjugacy. The uniformizer criterion now determines every group:
For the wild case the different exponent is . Independently, the cubic subfield has different exponent , and the quadratic extension is tame with exponent one. The tower formula gives , confirming the filtration. Its positive upper break is , because . This completes ramification of the splitting field of X3 plus pX plus p for every odd prime number.
The filtration and its meaning. Let be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, with group , normalized valuation , and residue fields of characteristic . The lower ramification numbering is
The higher ramification groups are normal, decrease with , and eventually become trivial: for each nonidentity automorphism some integral element is moved by a nonzero amount. The first group is the inertia group, with
Its fixed field is the maximal unramified extension inside . The wild inertia group is . For a uniformizer , there are injective homomorphisms
The kernels are the indicated next groups; the additive homomorphism assertion follows by expanding a product of automorphisms modulo . These maps show that is cyclic of order prime to , while is an -group. Thus tame ramification is exactly the case .
To calculate the groups, the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups says
Indeed, is generated by over the integers of the maximal unramified subextension, which fixes. Differences of powers of are divisible by , so the one test implies all the defining inequalities.
Eisenstein facts used in the calculations. For a complete discrete valuation ring with uniformizer , a monic polynomial
is an Eisenstein polynomial if for every and . The Eisenstein criterion makes it irreducible. If is a root, its valuation relative to the base normalization is , the extension has degree and ramification index , its residue field is unchanged, and
The root valuation follows by comparing the terms of its equation. The ramification index must then be at least , hence exactly . In the basis , the valuations of are distinct modulo , so an integral linear combination has every . This proves the integer-ring assertion. Conversely, a uniformizer in a totally ramified extension generates the field, and its minimal polynomial is Eisenstein; this follows from its value , equal valuations of its conjugates, and the valuation one of its norm.
For a monogenic separable integer ring , the different ideal is generated by . For a Galois extension, the different exponent from ramification groups is
In the totally ramified case these agree directly: , and an automorphism with displacement valuation contributes once to each of .
Upper numbering. Extend the lower indexing to real by , and set
On take . This Herbrand function slows the indexing as the groups shrink. Lower numbering is compatible with subgroups, while upper ramification numbering is compatible with quotients: for normal , . This is the fact that upper ramification groups commute with quotients. Thus upper breaks are particularly useful when comparing intermediate Galois extensions.
The eighth-root cyclotomic extension. Put and . The shifted cyclotomic polynomial
is Eisenstein at two. Hence is totally ramified of degree four, , and is a uniformizer. Its Galois group consists of for , and is .
Since is a unit,
For , this is the valuation of or , namely two, because their squares are units times two. For , it is . The ramification groups of the eighth-root cyclotomic extension of the 2-adic field are therefore
The lower breaks are one and three, and
Thus the upper breaks are one and two:
The different exponent from ramification groups is , agreeing with from the derivative of .
The cubic splitting field at three. Let , , and put
The polynomials
are Eisenstein at three. They give totally ramified subextensions of degrees three and two. Their intersection is the base field, so has degree six. Its ramification index is divisible by both three and two, hence equals six; therefore is totally ramified. It is the splitting field of , with Galois group .
Normalize so that . Then and , making
a uniformizer. Let and . They generate . Since ,
For the order-three automorphism,
Here is a unit and . The same calculation gives valuation two for . The three transpositions are conjugate and the defining filtration is normal, so they all have displacement valuation one. The ramification groups of the splitting field of T3 minus 2 over Q3 are
The lower breaks are zero and one. Since for ,
and the upper groups are
The different exponent from ramification groups is . As an independent check, the cubic subfield has different exponent , and the quadratic extension above it is tame with different exponent one. Transitivity of the different ideal gives , as required.
Normalize the discrete valuation on by , set , and write for its valuation ring. For a finite Galois extension of local fields, define and, for integers ,
Equivalently, is the kernel of the action on . These are the lower ramification numbering of the ramification groups. In particular, is the inertia group, the kernel of the action on the residue field, and is the wild inertia group. They form a decreasing sequence of normal subgroups, eventually trivial.
For a real index , extend by . Define the Herbrand function by
It is continuous, strictly increasing and piecewise linear; denote its inverse by . The upper ramification numbering is
The definition includes the placement of the groups at break endpoints: the group at a break is the group before the drop. Lower numbering is compatible with subgroups; upper numbering is the one compatible with quotients. In a totally ramified extension, the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups permits testing the defining valuation inequality on one uniformizer instead of on every integral element.
Let be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, let , and normalize the discrete valuation by . The lower ramification numbering is
Here is the inertia group and is the wild inertia group. For real , put ; thus for . Define the Herbrand function and its inverse by
extending on . The upper ramification numbering is for .
Let over , with its uniformizer. The Artin–Schreier polynomial has derivative in characteristic , so all its roots are distinct. If is one root and another, then , so . Conversely every , , is a root. Thus contains all roots and is a splitting field of a separable polynomial; it is Galois. Every automorphism has the form , and its Galois group embeds in the additive group of .
There is no root in . If , then cannot have negative valuation. If , the ultrametric inequality gives , divisible by , whereas is not. The Galois group is consequently nontrivial. Its order divides the prime , so
Let be the ramification index. The equation forces , and hence
As , . Since , we get , residue-field degree one, and . Thus this is a totally ramified extension, and
This is a uniformizer. The uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups states that for a totally ramified Galois extension, exactly when . Here every nonidentity automorphism satisfies
Therefore the ramification break of an Artin–Schreier pole occurs at , and the lower groups are
This includes , where the break is one. There is no off-by-one shift: the condition is .
For the upper groups, compute the Herbrand function explicitly:
Hence the upper break is also and, with the stated real-index convention,
As a consistency check, satisfies the Eisenstein polynomial . Its derivative in characteristic is , giving different exponent , equal to from the different exponent from ramification groups.
Normalize the discrete valuation by , and put . For , define its ramification number
and set . The minimum exists: all finite values are nonnegative integers, and a nonidentity automorphism moves some integral element. The lower ramification numbering is
Thus , is the inertia group, and is the wild inertia group. This states the convention at integer endpoints as well as between them. Automorphisms preserve , so these are normal subgroups of .
Define the Herbrand function and its inverse by
The integrand is positive and piecewise constant. Since for sufficiently large , the function is continuous, strictly increasing and unbounded, and its inverse is defined on all nonnegative reals. The upper ramification numbering is
In particular, the denominator in the Herbrand integral involves , even when is not totally ramified. These conventions are also given in Milne's Class Field Theory, Chapter I, §4.
Now use the monogenic hypothesis . Since is Galois, its minimal polynomial has the distinct conjugates as roots, so
Taking valuations proves the first equality.
For every polynomial , the difference is divisible in by . Every element of is such a polynomial value, and taking the element attains the resulting lower bound. Hence
For an integer , the element lies in exactly the groups ; if , it lies in none. Summing this count over the nonidentity elements and interchanging the two finite sums gives
This proves the ramification-group sum for a monogenic integer ring. Equivalently it is the different exponent from ramification groups, since the different ideal is generated by under the same monogenic hypothesis.
Let and normalize . The lower ramification groups are
with . In particular is the inertia group, and is the wild inertia group. When the extension is totally ramified, the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups permits the equivalent test on one uniformizer.
Let be a root of
The polynomial is Eisenstein at , so is totally ramified of degree three and . Its discriminant is
Its odd valuation makes nonsquare in , so the Galois group of an irreducible cubic shows that the splitting field has Galois group . The quadratic extension obtained by adjoining is ramified, so is totally ramified. Therefore
because the wild inertia group is the unique Sylow -subgroup of .
It remains to find the wild break. Since
and is a unit, the different ideal of has exponent . The extension is a tamely ramified quadratic extension and has different exponent one. The different in a tower therefore gives different exponent
On the other hand, the different exponent from ramification groups is
where is the last index for which . Thus , and
Let and normalize . In lower numbering,
These are the ramification groups; is the inertia group and is the wild inertia group.
Because , every is for some . The polynomial identity has integral coefficients. Consequently the inequality for implies it for every , and the converse follows by taking . Therefore
Since is a Finite Galois extension, the minimal polynomial factors as
Differentiating and evaluating at gives
and hence
For a fixed nonidentity , its valuation is exactly the number of integers for which . Interchanging the two finite sums proves the ramification-group sum for a monogenic integer ring:
The extension is unramified exactly when , which by this nonnegative sum is equivalent to , or . Moreover , so the term is . Equality
holds exactly when , which is exactly tame ramification.
Let and normalize . The lower ramification groups are
with . If , the same inequality defines inside , so directly
Now suppose is Finite Galois extension. The inertia group is the kernel of the action on the residue field. Restriction sends into . Conversely, the maximal unramified subextension of is the intersection of with the maximal unramified subextension of . The Galois correspondence therefore shows that the restriction image is all of .
For the explicit extension, take and a primitive cube root of unity . The polynomial is Eisenstein over , while is a ramified quadratic extension. Its splitting field
is therefore a totally ramified extension of degree six with Galois group . With , one has and , so
is a uniformizer. Let , , and let , . Then
The two nonidentity elements of have ramification number four, whereas each transposition has ramification number one. Hence
In particular, is the wild inertia group.
For , the residue of gives a homomorphism to the additive residue field with kernel . On composing two automorphisms, their leading displacement coefficients add because each fixes residues and changes the uniformizer only in degree at least two. These successive quotients are elementary abelian groups in residue characteristic . The filtration terminates, so the wild inertia group is a finite -group.
Tamely ramified extension Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
A finite extension of local fields is tamely ramified when its residue-field extension is separable and its ramification index is coprime to the residue characteristic. For a finite Galois extension this is equivalent to trivial wild inertia group .
For a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, this is a homomorphism from the inertia group to with kernel the wild inertia group. Inertia acts trivially on residue units, which proves multiplicativity and independence of the chosen uniformizer. Passing to the maximal unramified subextension reduces the kernel calculation to a totally ramified extension. Hence it embeds the tame inertia quotient into the cyclic multiplicative group of the residue field.