If you believe unverified information, you will lose money.

We have to distinguish between two types of creations. We'll discuss how the cost of coming up with both can be recouped without intellectual property and its awfulness.

Published on the session reports of the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences at Berlin 1918 page 464.

Is about Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime, and notably introduces gauge theory.

Viewable for free at: archive.org/details/mobot31753002089727/page/464/mode/2up.

The libertarian opposition to government-funded welfare is based on of course, ideals of voluntaryism, but also on the efficiency of private entities. Simply giving the poor money is not the best way to end poverty. With private charities, the ones that can actually cause change in a neighbourhood will get donations, and inefficient ones won't. This will likely involve putting conditions on the money given, eg., that the able-bodied and able-minded must participate in education/employment. There's also the task of making such initiatives as efficient as possible.

If a pseudo-libertarian government were to forcibly collect money for welfare, it would be best to decouple the voting for the NAP-enforcing and welfare-providing branches, but there would still be a big problem.

If contributing to welfare was compulsory and the welfare provider was voted upon democratically, the votes of wealthy charity givers that want to see change would be drowned out by the votes of the poor that would prefer to receive money with no strings attached, and the votes of the upper and middle classes that want their contributions reduced. And if the voting isn't democratic, the system will be overthrown by the people. But reducing compulsary welfare via the votes of the upper and middle class is currently possible if all of them could be convinced that it is misplaced kindness.

The main concern people have regarding abolishing welfare is whether enough money will be donated to cover all poor people. The rich who can afford to donate large amounts already do, be it out of kindness or to acquire goodwill, and people would certainly donate a lot more if they didn't already have to pay half their money in income, property, value-added, excise, and numerous other taxes, for the "betterment of society". Libertarians believe that this, combined with the fact that the best performing charities will be the ones donated to, mean that poverty will be alleviated with less money needing to be spent.

We can't definitively prove this yet, so why not first test things out by slowly reducing the scope of government welfare? It must not all be cut suddenly, since time will be needed for the culture surrounding welfare to shift as people pay less in taxes, and for private charities to strengthen and become effective.

Extremely precocious, borderline child prodigy, he was reading Dirac at 13-14 from the library.

He started working at night and sleeping during the moring/early afternoon while he was at university.

He was the type of guy that was so good that he didn't really have to follow the university rules very much. He would get into trouble for not following some stupid requirement, but he was so good that they would just let him get away with it.

Besides quantum electrodynamics, Julian worked on radar at the Rad Lab during World War II, unlike most other top physicists who went to Los Alamos Laboratory to work on the atomic bomb, and he made important contributions there on calculating the best shape of the parts and so on.

He was known for being very formal mathematically and sometimes hard to understand, in stark contrast to Feynman which was much more lose and understandable, especially after Freeman Dyson translated him to the masses.

However, QED and the men who made it: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga by Silvan Schweber (1994) does emphacise that he was actually also very practical in the sense that he always aimed to obtain definite numbers out of his calculations, and that was not only the case for the Lamb shift.

Stanza is a natural language processing (NLP) library developed by the Stanford NLP Group. It provides a suite of tools and models for various NLP tasks, including part-of-speech tagging, dependency parsing, named entity recognition, and more. Stanza supports multiple languages and is designed to be easy to use, making it accessible for researchers and developers working on linguistic and text processing applications.

Chaotic maps are mathematical functions or systems that exhibit chaos, which is a complex and unpredictable behavior that arises in certain dynamical systems. These maps are often studied in the context of chaos theory, where small changes in initial conditions can lead to significantly different outcomes, a phenomenon popularly known as the "butterfly effect." Key characteristics of chaotic maps include: 1. **Nonlinearity**: Most chaotic systems are nonlinear, meaning that their relationships cannot be described with simple linear equations.

Berkeley 87, also known as B87 or Berkeley 87, refers to a version of the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) Unix operating system. Specifically, it denotes the version released in 1987, which was the first to incorporate significant changes and enhancements over previous releases, especially regarding networking capabilities, file system improvements, and new utilities.

"CG 4" could refer to different things depending on the context. Here are a few possibilities: 1. **CG 4 as Gaming Terminology**: In the context of gaming, "CG" might stand for "character grade" or a specific in-game ranking system related to characters or levels.

NGC 2359 is a notable astronomical object located in the constellation Canis Major. It is often referred to as the "Duck Nebula" due to its resemblance to a duck's head and bill when viewed in images. NGC 2359 is a bright planetary nebula, which is a type of emission nebula formed by the ejection of material from a dying star.