Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli 40

Answers suggest hat you basically pick a random large odd number, and add 2 to it until your selected primality test passes.

The prime number theorem tells us that the probability that a number between 1 and $N$ is a prime number is $1/log(N)$.

Therefore, for an N-bit integer, we only have to run the test N times on average to find a prime.

Since say, A 512-bit integer is already humongous and sufficiently large, we would only need to search 512 times on average even for such sizes, and therefore the procedure scales well.

The key takeaway is that setting an explicit value function to an AGI entity is a good way to destroy the world due to poor AI alignment. We are more likely to not destroy by creating an AI whose goals is to "do want humans what it to do", but in a way that it does not know before hand what it is that humans want, and it has to learn from them. This approach appears to be known as reward modeling.

Some other cool ideas:

Lit: fish timber question answer.

On Baidu Baike: baike.baidu.com/item/渔樵问答/336905

The dialog is also known as allegory for an incredibly deep philosophical discussion between an idealized wise woodcutter and a fisherman, e.g. mentioned at: www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Writings/Fisherman%20and%20Woodcutter.pdf

This song is just too slow for Ciro Santilli to make much out of it.

Bibliography:

ECDH has smaller keys. youtu.be/gAtBM06xwaw?t=634 mentions some interesting downsides:

Perhaps the appeal of Zen is that it stepped away from Mahayana's "God and entities", and went a bit back towards the Buddhist psychology-like/self improvement grassroots?

Yet another name for a personal knowledge base, some usages:

Lists of digital gardens:

One notable application: cryptocurrency, see e.g. how Bitcoin works.

Sample implementations:

Good because unnecessary state is the source of much evil.

Even if we cannot do everything in functional, we should at least strive to clearly extract functional substes in what we do.

Why would physicists use a letter such that:Why? Why?????????