Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli  40

This metric is so dumb! It only helps maintain existing closed journals closed! Why not just do a PageRank on the articles themselve instead? Like the h-index does for authors? That would make so much more sense!

 Read the full article

Physics Letters B Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

www.sciencedirect.com/journal/physics-letters-b

 Read the full article

Physics Letters A Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

www.sciencedirect.com/journal/physics-letters-a

 Read the full article

1987 Nobel Prize in Physics Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

This was so hot (no pun intended) and reproducible that the prize was awarded one year after discovery. Quite rare in those days already.

 Read the full article

No pun intended Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

On Urban Dictionary: www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=no%20pun%20intended

 Read the full article

Physical Review Letters Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

As indicated by its name, the journal contains mostly short letters sent to the editor, often 2 or 3 pages long, which allows for a faster publication cycle and dissemination of new results. This is notably useful for experimental physics.

 Read the full article

Physics Letters Updated 2025-07-16

 Read the full article

Paper by Brian Josephson Updated 2025-07-16

 Read the full article

Physics journal Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

The strongest are:

early 20th century: Annalen der Physik: God OG physics journal of the early 20th century, before the Nazis fucked German science back to the Middle Ages
20s/30s: Nature started picking up strong
40s/50s: American journals started to come in strong after all the genius Jews escaped from Germany, notably Physical Review Letters

 Read the full article

Fugging, Upper Austria Updated 2026-08-21

 View more

 Read the full article

Austria Updated 2025-07-16

 Read the full article

Mond Laboratory Updated 2026-08-21

 View more

cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/PH-CAVENDISH-P-00822/1

 Read the full article

University of Cambridge laboratory Updated 2025-07-16

 Read the full article

History of the Josephson effect Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

In 1962 Brian Josephson published his inaugural paper predicting the effect as Section "Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling".

In 1963 Philip W. Anderson and John M. Rowell published their paper that first observed the effect as Section "Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling".

Some golden notes can be found at True Genius: The Life and Science of John Bardeen page 224 and around. Philip W. Anderson commented:

We were all - Josephson, Pippard and myself, as well as various other people who also habitually sat at the Mond tea and participated in the discussions of the next few weeks - very much puzzled by the meaning of the fact that the current depends on the phase

As part of the course Anderson had introduced the concept of broken symmetry in superconductors. Josephson "was fascinated by the idea of broken symmetry, and wondered whether there could be any way of observing it experimentally."

 Read the full article

Philip W. Anderson Updated 2025-07-16

 Read the full article

How to teach / Projects must aim for novelty Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

The projects you do must always aim to achieving some novel result.

You don't have to necessarily reach it. But you must aim for it.

Novel result can be taken broadly.

E.g., a new tutorial that explains something in a way never done before is novel.

But there must be something to your project that has never been done before.

You can start by reproducing other's work.

 Read the full article

 There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.