Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Past exam of the fluids and waves course of the University of Oxford 2017 1 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Set . The hyperbolic cosine addition formula givesFor and , both factors in the imaginary part are positive. Thus the image lies in the upper half-plane. The three walls map onto the entire real axis:Also in the interior.
To verify that this is a one-to-one conformal map onto the whole upper half-plane, factor it through . This first map is one-to-one onto , , and . Given any , the roots of have product one. Neither lies on , since that would make real. Exactly one root therefore has , andforces that root into the upper half of the exterior disk. It has a unique preimage with . This proves both surjectivity and injectivity. The construction is the hyperbolic-cosine map of a half-strip.
The source location is complex, with and . Put , so . The method of images places an equal line source at below the real axis:For real , the product of the two logarithm arguments is . Hence the streamfunction is constant along the wall, on locally consistent branches of the complex logarithm, and there is no normal velocity. Pulling back gives the requested complex potential of a two-dimensional potential flow:This is the line source in a closed-end semi-infinite strip, with no extra imposed flow. Since , near the physical source . Thus a regular term, verifying that the source strength remains under the conformal map. The image source has no preimage inside the physical strip. Finally, as , a constant, so the far-field velocity is and the channel carries exactly the injected volume flux .
Past exam of the fluids and waves course of the University of Oxford 2015 3 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Let . The end-wall forcing has transverse factor , which already satisfies both fixed-wall Neumann boundary conditions. By linearity and separation of variables, seek its periodic response asSubstitution into the wave equation and the moving-wall condition givesThe acoustic waveguide cutoff is thereforeIt is the lowest nonzero transverse-mode frequency. The uniform transverse mode has no cutoff, but is not excited here because .
For , put . The axial equation has solutions . Boundedness removes the growing exponential, and fixes the coefficient. ThusThis evanescent wave oscillates in time but decays with penetration length . Its axial velocity is proportional to , while its excess pressure is proportional to . They are in phase quadrature, so their mean product, the axial acoustic energy flux, is zero.
For , put . The axial solutions are . The outgoing condition selects for the chosen time convention, andTaking the real part givesIts axial velocity is , so the moving-wall condition is satisfied with the correct sign. This is a traveling acoustic waveguide mode carrying energy toward positive . Its dispersion relation isThe larger axial phase velocity does not imply faster energy transport: the group velocity controls that transport.
At , the axial equation becomes . The imposed nonzero derivative forces a constant, which is unbounded. Thus there is no bounded periodic response at exact cutoff for this infinite, undamped, velocity-driven model. The divergent coefficients as or also show why the assumed small perturbations fail sufficiently close to cutoff at fixed forcing. Initial conditions can add free transients; the displayed formulas give the selected periodic forced response.
An oscillating end wall excites either an evanescent disturbance or an outgoing acoustic wave
. The transverse shape is . Below cutoff, the normalized axial potential decays exponentially; above cutoff it oscillates downstream with an outgoing phase. The right panel shows the common cutoff and the propagating dispersion branch. Details. Past exam of the fluids and waves course of the University of Oxford 2015 3 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The fixed upper and lower walls have zero normal velocity. Since , their no-penetration boundary conditions areFor the moving end wall, use its level-set equation . The kinematic boundary condition gives the exact impermeability relationBoth and are first order, so their product is second order. A Taylor expansion from to changes the first-order perturbation velocity only at second order as well. ThusAt infinity, select a bounded response with no waves incident from . A propagating acoustic waveguide mode must satisfy the outgoing radiation condition for a waveguide mode, while a nonpropagating mode must decay. For a time dependence , a propagating axial factor has the form , , and obeys . An evanescent factor is , .
Requiring for all frequencies would incorrectly exclude the radiated traveling waves. In this lossless channel they retain finite amplitude arbitrarily far downstream.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact






