Original announcement dated 21 July 1820; English historical translation inspected, first experiments and requirement for a complete circuit. Check subsequent text pages before detailed above/below-wire statements.
Institutional description of the LISE optical workshop. No publication date inferred from the crawl date or the page's use of the present tense.
Official indexed text inspected: identifies David Vernet as workshop head, describes optical fabrication for C2PU and two one-metre telescopes, and captions polishing the first 1.04-metre primary mirror. The personal article attributes these statements to the institutional description rather than asserting a current job appointment.
Original paper reproduced in the appendix of this annotated document: violetzebra3.sakura.ne.jp/airyR1.pdf
Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 5, 283–291. Cited for the circular-aperture diffraction calculation; the modern introductory commentary is distinct from the reproduced original paper.
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory education activity. Materials and steps 2–7 describe two cards, pierced foil, projection onto the receiving card and the effect of changing the card separation.
Author’s research account, heading Active Optics Methods and Research section. Describes elasticity theory, stress figuring, variable-curvature mirrors and fabrication of aspheric optical surfaces.
Manufacturer glossary: low-energy secondary-electron emission, surface sensitivity and secondary signals excited away from the primary probe position.
Institutional account published by the University of Rochester: www.rochester.edu/news/printable.php?id=1288
Cited passage: Andrew Stentz's erbium-based soliton laser, test through a forty-kilometer dispersion-decreasing fiber and comparison with conventional fibers.
The illumination geometry excludes direct light from the objective while admitting light scattered by the specimen.
Figures 1 and 6 compare contrast methods and describe sheared polarized beams in differential interference contrast.
The numbered procedure distinguishes focusing and centering the field diaphragm from adjusting the condenser aperture.
Mathematics achievement is attained performance on specified mathematical learning objectives. Its meaning depends on the content and scoring of the assessment: proficiency in counting, arithmetic and geometry need not form an identical profile. A total score can summarize performance while concealing which skills changed.
An informative intervention therefore measures more than success on its practiced activity. In Geetha B. Ramani's study with Robert S. Siegler, children played either a linear numbered board game or a corresponding color board game. Assessment included counting, numeral identification, numerical magnitude comparison and number-line estimation, rather than only skill at winning the game.[ref]
Improvement on an assessment is evidence about that outcome in the studied population. Claims about broader mathematical understanding require appropriate generalization tests and a comparison design that separates the intervention from maturation, repeated testing and other experiences.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact