In the Bloch wave sum, is the number of sites, the equilibrium position of site , a localized atomic orbital there, and the crystal wavevector. The phase factor gives the translation character of the Bloch state. The factor normalizes it when the site orbitals are treated as orthonormal; appreciable intersite overlap requires an overlap-dependent normalization.
For a tight-binding model, choose localized orbitals and calculate the on-site and intersite Hamiltonian matrix elements. Form Bloch sums for each orbital type and solve at each , where is the orbital-overlap matrix. In the orthogonal tight-binding approximation, . The eigenvalues give the energy bands and the eigenvectors their orbital composition; the nonorthogonal nearest-neighbour tight-binding band illustrates how retained overlap modifies this procedure.
For one orthonormal s orbital per site, keep on-site energy and real nearest-neighbor hopping integral . The two neighbors contribute phases , giving . The band-curvature definition gives
With the usual bonding convention for these s orbitals, the center is a minimum with positive electron effective mass and the edge a maximum with negative electron effective mass. Hole masses near a filled-band maximum have the opposite sign.
For p orbitals aligned along the chain, the orbital phase and the sign of one-dimensional hopping reverse the usual center-versus-edge ordering. Choose every orbital with its positive lobe on the right. Equal neighboring Bloch coefficients then bring opposite-sign lobes together between sites, giving an antibonding state at . Alternating coefficients at make those facing lobes have the same sign, producing the lower bonding state. Thus a nearest-neighbor model has with the usual , maximum at zero and minima at the zone edges. This uses a fixed common orbital-phase convention at all sites.
Figure 1.
Opposite band curvature for bonding s orbitals and chain-aligned p orbitals
. Original nearest-neighbor dispersions with independent zero on-site energies and unit hopping magnitudes. The lower diagrams show orbital signs for equal site coefficients at the zone center: s lobes face with the same sign, while neighboring lobes face with opposite signs. Energies and orbital sizes are schematic. Details.
In a direct optical transition, a photon promotes an electron between the valence band and conduction band at essentially the same crystal wavevector: optical photon momentum is small on the scale of the Brillouin zone. An indirect optical transition also needs a phonon or another momentum source. Near an indirect gap, phonon emission requires photon energy approximately , while phonon absorption permits with a thermally occupied phonon.
Strong direct interband absorption needs both many allowed transitions and a nonzero optical matrix element. The joint density of states counts pairs with ; nearly parallel bands and critical points of this energy difference can enhance it. Dipole selection rules and polarization weight that count, so a large joint density of states alone does not guarantee a strong absorption peak.
The supplied infrared spectrum lies below the interband threshold and instead probes free-carrier response. In the Drude model, , with . At long wavelengths the mobile electrons screen the field and the reflectivity is high. As wavelength decreases through the screened plasma edge, the real dielectric function becomes positive and propagating light can enter. The reflectivity reaches its minimum near index matching, , then rises toward the bound-electron background reflectance.
For background , its refractive index is four and the normal-incidence Fresnel equations give . The short-wavelength side of the figure is approaching a reflectance of this order, consistent with that background; its shortest plotted wavelength still has a carrier correction. Here “infinity” means high frequency relative to the free-carrier scale while remaining below the remote interband resonances.
The Drude-Lorentz reflectivity minimum is near , not the plasma-edge zero . Reading the deep minimum as and neglecting damping there gives . The carrier effective mass from a reflectivity minimum is therefore
The graph supports only a rough read-off: shifting the minimum by changes this mass by about five percent. The deep narrow minimum supports the weak-loss assumption in this region, although finite scattering explains why the long-wavelength reflectivity is below unity. The estimate also assumes one dominant carrier species, a nonmagnetic bulk sample and a nearly constant background dielectric function. If the plasma-edge zero is used instead, its denominator is and its wavelength is slightly longer; the two wavelengths must not be interchanged.
Figure 1.
Drude-model reflectivity minimum and screened plasma edge
. Original calculation using , and a mass chosen to place the lossless reflectivity minimum at . The finite-scattering curve uses an illustrative relaxation time, not a fit to the exam's data. The supplied figure has not been copied or traced. Details.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact