Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 C C2 i Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 B B2 iii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Choose one regular tetrahedron inscribed in the dodecahedron and let be its stabilizer among rotations of the dodecahedron. The twelve rotations of that tetrahedron preserve the dodecahedron; geometrically these are its identity, eight rotations by about tetrahedral vertex axes and three half-turns about opposite tetrahedral edge axes. They act faithfully on its four vertices and give the twelve even permutations. Thus without using part (ii).
To check the core condition geometrically, the fifteen half-turns of the dodecahedron, about opposite-edge-midpoint axes, are conjugate under its rotations. A normal subgroup contained in cannot contain even one of these half-turns, because normality would then force all fifteen into a group of order twelve. On the other hand every nontrivial normal subgroup of contains a half-turn: if it contains a three-cycle, its conjugates and their inverses generate ; otherwise its nonidentity elements are among the three double transpositions, which are conjugate in . Apply this observation to any normal subgroup of the full rotation group lying inside . It must be trivial, proving exactly the required condition.
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 B B2 ii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Act by left multiplication on the five cosets of . The kernel is the core , a normal subgroup contained in , so the hypothesis makes it trivial. Thus embeds in , and its image has order and index two. An index-two subgroup is normal, so the quotient is of order two. Every three-cycle maps trivially to that quotient, since its order divides three. Three-cycles generate , so the image contains ; their equal order gives .
For completeness, prove simplicity rather than merely invoking it. The nonidentity even cycle types in are three-cycles, products of two disjoint transpositions and five-cycles. In , a three-cycle has centralizer of order three, so its conjugacy class has size . A double transposition has centralizer of order four in , giving class size . A five-cycle has centralizer its cyclic subgroup of order five, giving class size ; the such elements therefore split into two classes of size . These account for all elements with the identity.
A normal subgroup is a union of whole conjugacy classes, containing the identity, and its order must divide . No nonempty proper sum of the class sizes , plus one, is a divisor of greater than one: the possible proper nontrivial sums are . Only the full union has order . Hence , and so is .
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 B B2 i Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
A left action is a map satisfying and . The orbit of is . The action is transitive when there is exactly one orbit on the nonempty acted-on set, equivalently when any point can be moved to any other by a group element. An action is equivalently a homomorphism from to the permutation group of the set.
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 iv Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
For nonzero , Lagrange's theorem in gives ; zero satisfies too. Thus is the identity, and (iii) excludes every smaller positive order. Hence .
Any field automorphism of fixes and is determined by its value on . That value must be a root of the degree- minimal polynomial, so there are at most automorphisms. The powers of already attain this bound. Consequently .
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 iii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Take , the intended positive-exponent range. If , then fixes both and its field generator, so it fixes every element of . Every element would then be a root of . But that polynomial has degree , impossible for a nonzero polynomial over a field. Thus . The source writes only ; zero must be excluded, since .
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 ii Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Define on all of . The binomial coefficients between the endpoints are divisible by , so ; also and . Thus this is a field homomorphism. Its kernel is zero, and an injective self-map of the finite set is surjective. Hence , the Frobenius automorphism, with the required image of . It fixes by the preceding prime-subfield argument.
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 i Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Since and the extension is finite, the element is algebraic. Its minimal polynomial is irreducible, and evaluation gives an isomorphism . If its degree is , the powers form a basis. Comparing with gives .
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The finite field is a finite-dimensional vector space over its prime subfield of size . A basis has some positive length , and every element is uniquely specified by coefficients in . There are choices per coefficient, so and .
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2009 A A2 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The additive sequence must repeat because is finite, so the characteristic is positive. If its least positive value were composite, with , then while neither factor would be zero. A field has no zero divisors, giving a contradiction. Hence .
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 S 2 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
A finite irreducible aperiodic Markov chain converges to its unique stationary distribution from every initial state. Finiteness holds because nonnegative entries with fixed finite row sums are bounded. The given connecting-sequence property makes the chain irreducible: each feasible step in such a sequence has positive proposal probability and is accepted. The all-zero index table occurs with probability and gives a self-loop at every state, establishing aperiodicity. Reversibility supplied the stationary uniform law in (b). ConsequentlyThe conclusion also holds when the feasible state space is a singleton.
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 S 2 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Let be the number of index tables, including the zero table. If distinct feasible states differ by an index table, then , using the sign-reversal bijection for the reverse move. If they do not differ by an index table, both probabilities are zero. Since is uniform,For equal states detailed balance is tautological. Thus the chain is reversible and its uniform distribution is stationary.
Past exam of the Probability, statistics and options II course of the University of Oxford 2008 S 2 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Assume the fixed margins are compatible, so the finite state space is nonempty. At state , draw an index table from the stipulated uniform proposal law. If has any negative entry, reject and stay at ; otherwise accept and set the next state to . The margins stay fixed because the proposal has zero row and column sums.
The proposal set is invariant under . Hence proposals between two feasible distinct states are symmetric. The target density is constant, so the Metropolis–Hastings acceptance probability for a feasible proposal is one. The explicit rejection of infeasible proposals is essential: fixed margins by themselves do not guarantee nonnegative entries.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact





