Cloud-chamber expansion model
ID: cloud-chamber-expansion-model
Consider an illustrative water–air mixture, initially saturated at . Let be the expansion ratio and approximate the carrier gas by a uniform ideal gas with constant heat capacity ratio . Before significant condensation, assume fixed numbers of carrier and vapor molecules, negligible incoming heat, and the reversible adiabatic expansion relation. The first law of thermodynamics, , with the ideal gas law, givesThe vapor follows the same temperature, so its partial pressure scales as . A rapid real piston motion need not be reversible; the formula is an idealized bulk estimate after neglecting flow and losses.
Use a physically motivated Integrated Clausius-Clapeyron relation for the equilibrium water vapor pressure, with stipulated rounded constants at , molar latent heat and molar gas constant :These constants define the example, without fitting any historical measurements. Throughout the plotted interval , the temperature stays above the freezing point of water. InitiallyThus the decrease in vapor pressure initially beats dilution. At , the model gives , , and .
Cooling by adiabatic expansion, vapor pressure and the neutral-droplet nucleation barrier in a stipulated cloud chamber model
. Original calculations, not measured traces. The neutral-droplet model illustrates a barrier; it omits the charged clusters responsible for the detector's ion-assisted response. Details.Why does not instantly make every molecule a visible drop? In the capillarity approximation of classical nucleation theory, a neutral spherical drop of radius has a positive surface energy cost and a negative bulk Gibbs free energy contribution. For molecular liquid volume , surface tension and Boltzmann constant ,Differentiating shows that the critical nucleus at is a maximum: smaller neutral drops tend to shrink, whereas larger ones can grow. With stipulated , and , the example gives and . A substantial neutral-drop barrier can coexist with supersaturated vapor.
This is deliberately a neutral-drop comparison. An ion changes the cluster free energy through electrical interactions and molecular hydration; the formula does not calculate the ion-assisted nucleation threshold. At nanometre radii, using bulk surface tension is itself approximate. There is no predicted droplet count, growth time or detection efficiency here. Once many drops grow, latent heat release, vapor depletion and heat transfer from the chamber walls invalidate the dry adiabatic expansion trajectory. The example therefore explains the direction of the effect and the need for nucleation, without extrapolating its curves to Wilson's cloud limits.
New to topics? Read the docs here!
