 Solution

Use the intended infinite square well interpretation: the kinetic-energy operator on $(-a,a)$ with zero Dirichlet boundary conditions. The variational energy is most safely evaluated through its quadratic form,The boundary term vanishes because the trial function vanishes at both walls. Its zero extension has derivative jumps there, so the form interpretation avoids assigning an unrestricted full-line second derivative to it.

Set $u=x/a$ and $b=\lambda a^2$. Apart from an irrelevant factor $a^2$, the trial function is $q_b(u)=(1-u^2)(1+b{u}^2)$. Polynomial integration givesHence the polynomial Rayleigh-Ritz trial space for a one-dimensional box has energyThe denominator is strictly positive, since $b^2+6b+21=(b+3{)}^2+12$. Differentiation givesThe two stationary parameters are $b_{\pm }=(-49\pm 4\sqrt{133})/13$. The smaller is a local maximum; the larger is a local minimum. Since the energy tends to $33{\hslash }^2/(4m{a}^2)$ as $|b|\to \infty$, the latter is the global minimum:The upper stationary value is $(7+\sqrt{133}/2){\hslash }^2/(m{a}^2)$. Exact roots give a slightly tighter bound than substituting the rounded hints.

There are two qualifications to the printed operator and comparison energy. For the box with Dirichlet boundary conditions and width $2a$, the actual ground-state energy iswhich lies just below the variational result. The coefficient $6/5$ printed as an exact eigenvalue is inconsistent with this box problem. Also, merely declaring the differential expression to be zero outside the interval does not impose hard-wall confinement or specify a self-adjoint domain. Read literally on a space admitting exterior-supported states, it has zero-energy states outside and does not have the claimed positive ground energy. The boxed variational result is the well-defined answer for the intended confined particle; a different full-line operator would need its domain and matching conditions supplied.