The ground-state energy is the energy eigenvalue attained by a ground state. For a self-adjoint operator bounded below, distinguish this attained value from the always-defined spectral bottom . When a ground state exists, . Some usage calls the ground-state energy even when it is unattained; here an unattained bottom is explicitly identified as an infimum. The quantum variational principle states
Approaching this infimum with trial wavefunctions does not ensure that a minimizing wavefunction exists. [ref].
For the whole-line free particle with mass ,
Its spectrum is continuous and contains no energy eigenvalues represented by normalizable wavefunctions. The Fourier transform makes multiplication by ; a fixed energy restricts to a set of zero length, on which a nonzero square-integrable function cannot be supported. [ref]. An explicit family of normalized Gaussian wave packets demonstrates how the bottom is approached:
The formula follows from , integration by parts, and . Every finite width gives positive kinetic energy. At zero energy, would require an affine function on the whole line, which is never a nonzero normalizable wavefunction. Spreading a Gaussian wave packet indefinitely produces an unattained infimum, rather than a zero-energy ground state.
An additive choice of energy origin changes the numerical ground-state energy without changing the ground-state subspace. For , every energy eigenvalue becomes , while all differences stay fixed. Time evolution gains only the global phase . This makes excitation costs and spectroscopic differences more intrinsic than the isolated number .
The quantum variational principle estimates the lowest energy by choosing a trial wavefunction and computing its expectation value, without solving the Schrödinger equation exactly. Minimizing over a manageable family of trial wavefunctions gives an upper bound; enlarging that family can improve the estimate.
Let be a self-adjoint operator bounded below, and put . For in its operator domain ,
Trial states may also lie in the form domain , where . Then use the quadratic form of a positive quantum Hamiltonian shifted by :
This extends the expectation value beyond without requiring to exist. Equality for a normalized state holds exactly in the energy eigenspace at , if that eigenvalue exists. [ref].
A short proof makes the direction of the bound memorable. If has a complete orthonormal basis of energy eigenstates , write
The expectation value is a weighted average of allowed energies:
Equality requires every occupied energy eigenstate to have energy . [ref]. With continuous spectrum, the spectral theorem replaces the sum by an integral against the scalar spectral measure; the same nonnegative-difference argument works.
For an unnormalized trial wavefunction, divide by its squared norm: is the form version of the Rayleigh quotient. The quantum variational principle supplies an upper bound on ; it supplies neither a lower bound on nor, by itself, a guarantee that a bound state exists.
To see the method at work, choose the real Gaussian wave packet
The Gaussian integral gives wavefunction normalization and the two useful position averages:
Thus its position probability density is a normal distribution with standard deviation : large means narrow confinement. In units , integration by parts and give the kinetic energy
These smooth, rapidly decaying trial wavefunctions belong to the operator domains of both polynomial Quantum Hamiltonians below. Narrowing the Gaussian wave packet increases its kinetic energy; widening it increases the potential energy in either confining potential.
For the quantum harmonic oscillator, take :
The trial values at are respectively . The derivative changes sign at , where kinetic energy and potential energy are both . Here the trial family contains an exact ground state:
The zero-point energy remains positive even at the best width. For comparison, removing the potential leaves as : the free Quantum Hamiltonian on the line has spectral bottom zero but no normalizable zero-energy energy eigenstate. A sequence of ever broader trial wavefunctions need not approach an actual bound state.
Figure 1.
Gaussian trial widths and the kinetic–potential energy tradeoff
. Normalized Gaussian wave packets with have different position probability densities. The bars show the competing kinetic energy and harmonic potential energy ; their sum is smallest at . Details.
For a pure quartic oscillator, keep and set the quartic coefficient to one:
The trial values at are respectively . Setting the derivative to zero gives
The sign of this derivative changes from negative to positive at the optimum, giving the smallest energy within this Gaussian wave packet family:
At this width, and , so , as expected from the power-law quantum virial theorem for a scale-optimized trial wavefunction. The number is an upper estimate of the ground-state energy, not an asserted exact energy eigenvalue. Indeed,
depends on for every , so no member of this trial family is an energy eigenstate. Nevertheless, a single width parameter already turns a difficult Schrödinger equation into a useful, explicit energy estimate.
Figure 2.
Energy landscapes for harmonic and quartic Gaussian trials
. The quantum harmonic oscillator reaches its exact ground-state energy at . The pure quartic oscillator has a Gaussian wave packet optimum at giving only the upper bound . Dashed curves separate kinetic energy and potential energy. Details.
For , the normalized exponential with scale gives . Choosing proves binding if . Failure to obtain a negative trial expectation outside this range does not prove absence of a bound state. At equality a small positive admixture of the scale- exponential has a negative cross matrix element and proves binding too.
For a bound stationary state in a homogeneous potential , scaling a normalized wavefunction gives stationarity of at . Hence .

Ancestors (5)

  1. Ground state
  2. Quantum mechanics
  3. Branches of physics
  4. Physics
  5. Home

Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.